Content deleted Content added
blocked |
No edit summary |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
==Blocked== |
==Blocked== |
||
You have been blocked for 24 hours for edit warring, per discussion at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=905484796&oldid=905481980]. Stopping at three reverts, then doing three more after 24 hours have elapsed is not acceptable, and is no substitute for dialogue. Please be more careful in the future. — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 12:04, 9 July 2019 (UTC) |
You have been blocked for 24 hours for edit warring, per discussion at [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&diff=905484796&oldid=905481980]. Stopping at three reverts, then doing three more after 24 hours have elapsed is not acceptable, and is no substitute for dialogue. Please be more careful in the future. — [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]] ([[User talk:Amakuru|talk]]) 12:04, 9 July 2019 (UTC) |
||
: [[User:Amakuru|Amakuru]]: I have a lengthy dialog with the original "closer" at [[User_talk:MJL#Council_proposals]], where he had stopped trying to "close" this proposal. This new editor Bilorv (likewise, INVOLVED) took it upon himself to continue to [[WP:GAMING|GAME]] the situation by reopening the wound, as it were. Both these editors are performing an "closure" action which is unsupported by any policy or procedure related to [[WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals]], and you've just played into that hand. -- [[User:Netoholic|Netoholic]] [[User talk:Netoholic|@]] 12:08, 9 July 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:09, 9 July 2019
Some thoughts: | |
---|---|
"To avoid unkind criticism: say nothing, be nothing, do nothing."
|
"There are people who have good sense. There are idiots. A consensus of idiots does not override good sense. Wikipedia is not a democracy." |
Blocked
You have been blocked for 24 hours for edit warring, per discussion at [1]. Stopping at three reverts, then doing three more after 24 hours have elapsed is not acceptable, and is no substitute for dialogue. Please be more careful in the future. — Amakuru (talk) 12:04, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
- Amakuru: I have a lengthy dialog with the original "closer" at User_talk:MJL#Council_proposals, where he had stopped trying to "close" this proposal. This new editor Bilorv (likewise, INVOLVED) took it upon himself to continue to GAME the situation by reopening the wound, as it were. Both these editors are performing an "closure" action which is unsupported by any policy or procedure related to WP:WikiProject Council/Proposals, and you've just played into that hand. -- Netoholic @ 12:08, 9 July 2019 (UTC)