Lexi Marie (talk | contribs) →Images: nevermind |
Intimidated (talk | contribs) Communism |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
I cannot open the zip file you sent me last night. Please contact me on IRC asap. :D --[[User:Phroziac|Phroziac]] <sub>.</sub> <small>o</small> º<sup> O ([[User talk:Phroziac|mmmmm chocolate!]])</sup> 01:09, 6 December 2005 (UTC) |
I cannot open the zip file you sent me last night. Please contact me on IRC asap. :D --[[User:Phroziac|Phroziac]] <sub>.</sub> <small>o</small> º<sup> O ([[User talk:Phroziac|mmmmm chocolate!]])</sup> 01:09, 6 December 2005 (UTC) |
||
:...nevermind. i sent that at the same time you contacted me. haha. --[[User:Phroziac|Phroziac]] <sub>.</sub> <small>o</small> º<sup> O ([[User talk:Phroziac|mmmmm chocolate!]])</sup> 01:10, 6 December 2005 (UTC) |
:...nevermind. i sent that at the same time you contacted me. haha. --[[User:Phroziac|Phroziac]] <sub>.</sub> <small>o</small> º<sup> O ([[User talk:Phroziac|mmmmm chocolate!]])</sup> 01:10, 6 December 2005 (UTC) |
||
== Communism == |
|||
Hi there. Please observe the Wikipedia [[WP:3RR|Three-Revert Rule]] on [[Communism|this article]]. You have already reverted the same change four times, please stop and discuss the changes with the user in question before reverting again. |
|||
Many Thanks. --[[User:Intimidated|Intimidated]]<sup>[[User talk:Intimidated|talk]]</sup> 16:55, 10 December 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:55, 10 December 2005
Aetherometry
Hi Natalina. Sorry to see that you've gone over to the Dark Side :-) More seriously, I'd like to see the PS tag in; and I'm not sure why you've become so insistent on keeping it out. There is now a pretty fair consensus for having it in: if you ignore the anons, and the people that edit only Aeth, you're the only one who doesn't like it. William M. Connolley 09:35, 30 November 2005 (UTC).
- I removed the tag under the impression that if we removed the tag, the aetherometrists would be appeased, peace would exist and they wouldn't be incited to add additional POV. To me, this peace has lasted considerably, until the tag was added again. I mean, the last time peace wasn't achieved they added huge lists of links to irrelevant articles and categories such as "Natural Science". -- Natalinasmpf 16:38, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
- Yeeeessss... but now you're part of the revert war. And I can't say I'm happy doing deals with these folks, even implicitly. Still it seems to be quiet now. I won't revert you over this. William M. Connolley 16:41, 30 November 2005 (UTC) (ps: moved here: easier in one place).
- I just hope you won't think I am an ignorant supporter of questionable theories and conspiracy theorists after this. ;-) -- Natalinasmpf 16:52, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
- I thought you were supposed to be my sock puppet, anyway :-) William M. Connolley 18:17, 30 November 2005 (UTC).
Hi
I noticed this edit [1]. Please abide by our policies against attacks. I know it has been a long time since it happened, but I thought I should give you some advice. Thanks : ). εγκυκλοπαίδεια* (talk) 22:32, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Australian Anger
Hi Natalinasmpf,
Unless you do believe much in national pride, don't take the current arugements during this Van Tuong Nguyen saga too seriously - Note the fact now that there is Australian anger and you won't see too many rational additions for now, and they'll eventually go away when interest on the incident dies down (like Michael P. Fay). In case where you find your WikiStress boiling, try working on other articles in other topics of your interest. :)
- Greetings!, Mailer Diablo 15:38, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
Images
I cannot open the zip file you sent me last night. Please contact me on IRC asap. :D --Phroziac . o º O (mmmmm chocolate!) 01:09, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
- ...nevermind. i sent that at the same time you contacted me. haha. --Phroziac . o º O (mmmmm chocolate!) 01:10, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
Communism
Hi there. Please observe the Wikipedia Three-Revert Rule on this article. You have already reverted the same change four times, please stop and discuss the changes with the user in question before reverting again.
Many Thanks. --Intimidatedtalk 16:55, 10 December 2005 (UTC)