Nomoskedasticity (talk | contribs) |
OK, I got it; Not interested in the subject anymore. Don't won't to have anything on my talk page about some idiot who writes an article about himself |
||
Line 76: | Line 76: | ||
Congrats on getting this to GA status on uz.wiki! -- [[User:Khazar2|Khazar2]] ([[User talk:Khazar2|talk]]) 13:35, 26 February 2013 (UTC) |
Congrats on getting this to GA status on uz.wiki! -- [[User:Khazar2|Khazar2]] ([[User talk:Khazar2|talk]]) 13:35, 26 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
: Thank you! It's basically a result of your work. [[User:Nataev|Nataev]] ([[User talk:Nataev#top|talk]]) |
: Thank you! It's basically a result of your work. [[User:Nataev|Nataev]] ([[User talk:Nataev#top|talk]]) |
||
== Steven Plaut article == |
|||
Thank you for your comment. I was not edit warring, just requesting initially to produce some citations for the claims. |
|||
The deletion followed as citation were not provided. |
|||
Universities keep records of those who have been teaching, probably at a university/college archive. |
|||
In view of that, wouldn't you recommend to request such citations again, |
|||
and delete if no citations can be provided ? [[User:רסטיניאק|רסטיניאק]] ([[User talk:רסטיניאק|talk]]) 11:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC)rastiniak |
|||
: I'll look into it later when I get free. [[User:Nataev|Nataev]] ([[User talk:Nataev#top|talk]]) 11:27, 8 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Proposed deletion of [[Amiram Goldblum]] == |
|||
Hello, I have removed the proposed deletion tag you placed on [[Amiram Goldblum]]. '''Please do not re-add it'''. I did this purely for process reasons and have no comment on the merits of the deletion of the article. First and foremost, the proposed deletion process is only for use where deletion is believed to be uncontroversial, i.e., where the nominator believes '''no one''' will object. It is very apparent that deletion of this article is controversial, so proposed deletion is not appropriate. Secondly, per policy once a proposed deletion tag is removed, it cannot be re-added, even if the tag was removed in bad faith. |
|||
I have no prejudice against you nominating the article for deletion at [[WP:AFD|Articles for deletion]] and will likely not opine in such a discussion. Cheers, —<span style="color:#808080">[[User:Kuyabribri|'''KuyaBriBri''']]</span><sup><span style="color:#008080">[[User_Talk:Kuyabribri|''Talk'']]</span></sup> 16:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
: OK, thank you for letting me know. [[User:Nataev|Nataev]] ([[User talk:Nataev#top|talk]]) 16:26, 10 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::Funny how that worked out. [[User:Nomoskedasticity|Nomoskedasticity]] ([[User talk:Nomoskedasticity|talk]]) 16:37, 10 May 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:39, 10 May 2013
|
|||||||||||||
Re: 2010 South Kyrgyzstan riots
Hi. I see the merger proposal is from 2010, and there seems to have been very little discussion about it. In these circumstances, I think it's ok to remove it, as long as you explain why. Aridd (talk) 07:38, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you! Will do. Nataev (talk) 07:39, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Chiming in a little late here, but the work you've done on that article looks good. Dawnseeker2000 02:16, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, Dawnseeker2000! Nataev (talk) 05:09, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
Keep going: http://uz.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elektrogitara Akmalzhon 16:33, 16 June 2012 (UTC) |
Hi
Hi, nice to meet you too :D Here's a link to translatewiki if you're interested in translating to Uzbek: info page and main message group - thanks! Regards, SPQRobin (talk) 03:38, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Re: I woke up late, I'm currently still at the hostel downstairs. Where are you? SPQRobin (talk) 16:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
Geotags
Answer on my talk page. Thanks for making contact. --ClemRutter (talk) 09:20, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Re: Coordinates
Hi. Sorry; I really don't know. For lack of anything more specific, I would assume you can use the coordinates of the town, yes. Aridd (talk) 10:26, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- ClemRutter (talk) helped me out. Thanks for replying! Nataev (talk) 10:41, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello, the school article's existing coordinates show a building about 400 meters to the southeast of the town's coordinates. Is that the high school building? Dawnseeker2000 13:50, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- I double-checked. The coordinates are correct. I saw satellite images and identified the building. Nataev (talk) 13:55, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
That part about the Bakhshis was actually there before my edit. After your message, I tried to look for a source for that statement, but failed, so I removed it. Regards, Shrigley (talk) 21:33, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
re: Riots vs Ethnic Violence
Hello Nataev,
Looks like you have moved the article and it seems OK. Good work there! Dawnseeker2000 03:55, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks! Yes, I have moved the article. Everybody said it was OK. Nataev (talk) 06:37, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
userpage
I got most of it. I don't really know coding. Maybe shrink the ball. Let me think about it.....Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
- WOW! Thank you very much! It looks great! And you responded really fast! Thank you again! Nataev (talk) 08:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Uzbek ʻokina
Hi, thanks for your interesting RM on those films. Excuse my ignorance, but what is the correct Uzbek name for this Okina-like symbol? It should be noted on 'Okina and Uzbek alphabet. Thanks In ictu oculi (talk) 06:42, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
- ʻOkina or the single opening quotation mark?
- Is the symbol used in the Uzbek language really 'Okina? From what I've seen, most Uzbek government websites use a single opening quotation mark instead. In fact, I've never come upon one that uses okina. The Uzbek Wikipedia seems to be the only place it is used. – amateur (talk) 22:21, 5 December 2012 (UTC)
- Many people don't know how to find the ʻokina on their computers. Take a look at this spelling dictionary. Uzbek government sites are just as crappy as many other Uzbek sites. What do you mean you have never come upon a site that uses the ʻokina? As if you have seen all the Uzbek websites. One of the most popular Uzbek websites is Ozodlik and it's clear to a fool that they use the ʻokina. Nataev (talk) 08:00, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- Ozodlik uses the single opening quotation mark, not the ʻokina. The spelling dictionary does not specify which Unicode character to use on computers. – amateur (talk) 14:46, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- Nobody knows for sure whether the ʻokina or the single opening quotation mark should be used in Uzbek. They look exactly similar: ʻ (U+02BB) and ‘ (U+2018). As long as one of them is used instead of the English apostrophe, it is fine. Of course the dictionary does not specify which Unicode character to use on computers. What spelling dictionary on earth species what Unicode characters to use? I can't find a single Uzbek website that properly explains all the rules of the new Latin script. Nataev (talk) 15:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- Then I think we should look at what the governmental websites use, and as I previously said, they use the quotation mark.
- So, I think the recent edits on pages 'Okina and Uzbek alphabet that identify the symbol as okina should be reversed, as the proper symbol is most probably a quotation mark. – amateur (talk) 16:23, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- As I said before, we can't solely rely on governmental websites. If it was a governmental website about the Uzbek language, we could say we should use the quotation mark. Maybe governmental websites use the quotation mark because they couldn't find the okina. We can't be sure. Nataev (talk) 16:26, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- When I looked up Oʻzbekiston (U+02BB), Google gave me 5,340,000 results. When I looked up O‘zbekiston (U+2018), I got 4,870,000 results. So it's really not clear which character should be used. I've updated the articles on the ʻokina and Uzbek alphabet. That's all we can do for now I think. Please take a look. Nataev (talk) 19:15, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- As I said before, we can't solely rely on governmental websites. If it was a governmental website about the Uzbek language, we could say we should use the quotation mark. Maybe governmental websites use the quotation mark because they couldn't find the okina. We can't be sure. Nataev (talk) 16:26, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- Nobody knows for sure whether the ʻokina or the single opening quotation mark should be used in Uzbek. They look exactly similar: ʻ (U+02BB) and ‘ (U+2018). As long as one of them is used instead of the English apostrophe, it is fine. Of course the dictionary does not specify which Unicode character to use on computers. What spelling dictionary on earth species what Unicode characters to use? I can't find a single Uzbek website that properly explains all the rules of the new Latin script. Nataev (talk) 15:27, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- Ozodlik uses the single opening quotation mark, not the ʻokina. The spelling dictionary does not specify which Unicode character to use on computers. – amateur (talk) 14:46, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- Many people don't know how to find the ʻokina on their computers. Take a look at this spelling dictionary. Uzbek government sites are just as crappy as many other Uzbek sites. What do you mean you have never come upon a site that uses the ʻokina? As if you have seen all the Uzbek websites. One of the most popular Uzbek websites is Ozodlik and it's clear to a fool that they use the ʻokina. Nataev (talk) 08:00, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Azimjon Asqarov
Congrats on getting this to GA status on uz.wiki! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:35, 26 February 2013 (UTC)