Line 174: | Line 174: | ||
: This is a lie, a big lie, nothing is my personal POV man, do you see the sources????Man what is your problem?--[[User:Nado158|Nado158]] ([[User talk:Nado158#top|talk]]) 14:33, 13 June 2014 (UTC) |
: This is a lie, a big lie, nothing is my personal POV man, do you see the sources????Man what is your problem?--[[User:Nado158|Nado158]] ([[User talk:Nado158#top|talk]]) 14:33, 13 June 2014 (UTC) |
||
::Your behavior in regards to the stadium article, as well as your past behavior on articles regarding the Kosovo region, has brought your actions on these two football club articles into question.—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="Gold">琉竜</font>]]) 14:39, 13 June 2014 (UTC) |
::Your behavior in regards to the stadium article, as well as your past behavior on articles regarding the Kosovo region, has brought your actions on these two football club articles into question.—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="Gold">琉竜</font>]]) 14:39, 13 June 2014 (UTC) |
||
:::Ahhh come one, this have nothing to do with this. You sitting in Miami and think yopu have knowledge about the spors history in this part? Never. So what? I never vandalized or put my POV, always i worked with soruces, so dont tell me this. Because I removed wrong things wuth yssaources it into question? Your version have no one source. In to question is your behavior without sources and arguments. I tell you, this club dont exist since 2010 and you put it in a version whic is not true and have no one source. This are two differnet clubs. You can not take the history of another club and put it in the version of a another club. So, you dont have knowledge about this.--[[User:Nado158|Nado158]] ([[User talk:Nado158#top|talk]]) 14:45, 13 June 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:45, 13 June 2014
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Nado158, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! -- Joaquin008 (talk) 10:53, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
WikiThanks
In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.7.141 (talk) 23:19, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank you!--Nado158 (talk) 13:11, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
The Modest Barnstar | ||
You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this past month! 67.80.64.128 (talk) 22:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC) |
An award for you
Golden Wiki Award
Thanks for your recent contributions! 67.80.64.128 (talk) 01:38, 30 April 2012 (UTC) |
Republika Srpska
I see you fellas have been having trouble on Republika Srpska. I've requested semi-protection for the article [1], and, just for being so dilligent in your efforts - have a Barnstar :). -- Director (talk) 13:09, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Awarded for persistent efforts against IP vandalism -- Director (talk) 13:09, 19 May 2012 (UTC) |
- The IP user has been blocked. In the future I recommend you bring such obvious vandalism to the attentions of the admins immediately. Regards -- Director (talk) 14:11, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Thank you very much :). Ok, i will do. Regards --Nado158 (talk) 18:34, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Barnstar to Nado158
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar | |
For your continuos contributions to Serbian football related articles, I award you this barnstar, FkpCascais (talk) 03:31, 11 June 2012 (UTC) |
Competition icons
Hi, I suggest you read MOS:ICON, which says that icons should not be used simply for decoration, especially when the point is made perfectly well with text on its own. People know what the European Cup is without needing a crappy little icon of its trophy (which is copyrighted, by the way!). Therefore, please stop reverting me and leave the page as it was. – PeeJay 17:43, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Ok bro--Nado158 (talk) 18:54, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Your reverting of my removal of unsourced Serbian rivalries and the comments you made in the edit summaries was unhelpful. However, I see you have since added a couple of references, so presumably you're well aware of WP:V and WP:N as key foundations of Wikipedia, and have in some way acknowledged the point I was making. Can I ask that you cite the remaining Serbian references please, and they should really be independent sources. I have no agenda against Serbian teams, and deleted a number of other unsourced rivalries as well. Please tone down your edit summaries and if you have things to say use the article or user talk page instead. Thanks. Eldumpo (talk) 20:31, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, I am not Arab. What made you think that? OK, happy for you to find appropriate sources for those Serbian rivalries in due course, but don't make it too open-ended. By the way, what is 'achi'? Eldumpo (talk) 21:01, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Ako si
Ako si Srbin molim te pokušaj da poništiš ustašku propgandu koja svepristuna na osetljivim temama vezanim za srbiju i hrvatsku,primer za to je zemun gde se ističe njegovo hrvatstvo kroz nepouzdane izvore kao što je povijest hrvatske.jer ja ću biti blokiran vrlo brzo.
24.135.72.236 (talk) 10:45, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
- Ja sam vec blokiran i zabranjeno mi je t radi na tim temema--Nado158 (talk) 11:06, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Da li je korisnik Peacemaker Hrvat?Ne mogu da smislim neko drugo objašnjenje zašto je brisao rezultate popisa i dobronamerne komentare? Znam da korisnici poput šokac prvi drugi .ivanos, joy i ostali jesu. 24.135.72.236 (talk) 14:55, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Vidim,a kad pogledam teme koje ih interesuju i koje uređuju mogu da pretpostavim zašto su napravili korisnički nalog. 24.135.72.236 (talk) 07:34, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
- Tacno! Brate dajem ti jeda predlog, prikljuci se nama i napravi i ti nalog, bilo bi lepo ;).--Nado158 (talk) 11:30, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Ubrzo će se pojaviti dotični peacemaker koji će me optužiti po milioniti put da sam sockupuppet od korisnika sa kojim nemam baš nikakve veze,već sam pravio naloge.da li je se može verovati izvoru kao pto je povijest hrvatske da li je ona uloga navodnog marka skoblića istinita ili je možda preuveličana ili skroz izmišljena kako bi pretpostavljam dokazali njegovo hrvtastvo,možda preterujem što brišem jer s enajbolje ne razumem,ali je jako sumnjiv izvor,neki drugi itvori za zemun kao što je rhvatska reč i ostalo u kojima se između ostalog sugeriše da hrvati bili većina do polovine dvadeset veka a da su ih možeš verovati srbi proterali i tada i u devedesetim.takođe još jedno uznemirajuću činjenica dodali su među znamenite fudbalske klubove iz zemuna neke hrvatske koji su navodno zabranjeni posle drugog svetskog rata ,jadni ni krivi ni dužna i samo zbog činjenice da su hrvatski i eto slučajno su učestvovali u fudbalskom "natjecanju" NDH(koja je okupirala srem i zemun).te stranice još uvek postoje ali se srećom ne pominju na stranici zemun jer sam to obrisao a oni su odustali od toga.ja živim u zemunu i bio sam ružno iznenađen onim što sam mogao da pročitam na hrvatskoj vikipediji o zemunu,ali sam onda shvatio da su oni prešli i na englesku.
Isto mi je bilo čudno to šta sam mogao da pročitam na stranici Kosovo polje jer na primer u članku piše da su neki srbi ubijeni iako su bili umereni(pretpostavljam da to znači lojalni albanskim vlastima),a onda na stranici za razgovor neki albanac/albanka pišu kako engleska vikipedija laže i optužuje je za srpsku propgandu a kako sam/sama kaže oni nisu nikog ubijali i činili zločine a zatim piše "nije zločin ubiti srbe jer oni ovde ne pripadaju"!
Opet ne razumem se najbolje ali muslimani u sandžaku/raškoj nisu ljudi poreklkom iz bosne i hercegovine radi se o srbima koji su primili islam,kakve veze imaju sa bosnom?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HŠK_Zemun mislim na stranice poput ovih koje ne navode nikakve izvore ,samo navodne rezultate. Mislim to razmišljanje mi je donekle razumljivo od kada je zemun izdvojen od vojvodine i pripojen beogradu on se "srozao",znači to treba razumeti ovako da bi u zemunu ponovo cvetalo cveće treba ga vratiti sremu srem vojvodini a vojvodinu hrvtaskoj,onda ć će mu biti bolje. :)
što se tiče popisa takođe razumem da im smeta,jer popisi pokazuju da je broj hrvata u srbiji i vojvodini sve manji,a broj srba malo veći.na primer hrvata nema 80 već 48 hiljada,očigledno da žele da prikažu kako ih je mnogo više nego što ih zaista ima. Bunjevci su prikazani kao Hrvati uključujući i zvonka bogdana,primer kako su aktivni.na žalost ja to ne mogu da promenim jer ću biti blokiran bilo kao registrovan korisnik ili ne jer neko od njih stalno motri te članke.
24.135.72.236 (talk) 14:43, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Brate, sve ja tebe razumem ali ja sam pod zabranom upravo to sto sam se borio za istinu a ne za neku propagandu kao drugi protiv nas. Moras da znas da nam ovde pisu drugi istroiju i da vladaju velike bitke izmedju mnogih grupa ovde. Ovde je velika propaganda na nama i nekim drugim nacijama....nisi ni svestan. Velika je propaganda nad nama. Tim izvorima netrebas verovati, i bez tih izvora naprimer ja znam istinu i istroiju o Zemunu itd. I znaj da je sve to laz i da se sve to radi portiv nas. Misli da je normalno da Albanci i Hrvati vise cesto na nasim stranama i pisu o nasoj istoriji itd. SVe to bez interesa itd? Neznam, ja mislim da nije? Mogu samo da ti preporucujem da se vratis pod nalogom i da naucios upravo kako se ovde zaista radi itd i tako da budes koristan i to mnogo. Slozi sa nasima ovde itd, iako je smo malo nas ovde opstalo jel ovde vlada velika nepravda nad nama.--Nado158 (talk) 19:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Uopšte ne mogu da razumem tu količinu prosto neobjašnjive mržnje,primer danas mi je jedna čovek hrvat na stranici na facebooku o kojoj se poziva na nasilj i linč nad srbima zbog uvođenja ćirilice u vukovaru da sam "cigan" "da se nabijem na kurac" "da sam se usro od straha" "kukavička pička" "otpad čovečanstva" "treba vas istrebiti" "dobićeš kurac u oko",potpuno sam zgrožen bio jer mi niko tako nikad nije rekao ili napisao.čovek me zapravo i ne zna.ali ne znam da li je ovaj marko skoblić stvarna ličnost ili je možda njegova uloga preuveličana zaista ne znam takod a neću da diram ali se vrlo često koriste sumnjivi izvori,to je tačno 24.135.72.236 (talk) 20:01, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Nijedna vikipedija nema članak o dotičnom marku skobliću čak ni rhvatska a ne znam koliko su drugi hrvatski izvori poverljivi.tako da može biti da je istina,ali ne mora da znači. 24.135.72.236 (talk) 20:56, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
1.) Nije istina. 2.) Koliko god da si dobar, to se nece nazalost promenuti (to je tako i nema tu sta da razumes) i ovde se radi protiv nas za mnogo propagande. To je tako, nazalost. Sta ostaje, gledaj svoju stranu i bori se za svoje i za pravud, ako ne? bice samo jos gore. Ostalo sam ti objasnio. Ako oces da pomognes oko pravde, istine itd. rekao sam sta da radis. Podzrav--Nado158 (talk) 23:19, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of FK Partizan strip for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FK Partizan strip is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FK Partizan strip until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 13:02, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Uspeli smo
Uspeli smo! Partizanov clanak je dobio GA status. Glavni cilj je ispunjen. Sada ostaju da se urede i popune podclanci. Inace, hvala ti puno na pomoci i nadam se da cemo i u buduce saradjivati :) Pozdrav druze! (Nightwolf87 (talk) 10:40, 4 June 2013 (UTC))
- Pa to je savrseno :)! Bilo mi je cast da pomognem, da saradjujemo i da sam deo toga. Hvala i tebi. Zao mi je sto nisam mogao da pomognem ovi zadnjih trenutaka. Sa moje strane cemo i u buducnosti sigurno saradjivati ;) Veliki pozdrav druze!--Nado158 (talk) 18:11, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hehe na zdravlje! Hoce da uklone GA status jer clanak ima puno gramatickih gresaka i mnoge stvari nemaju izvore. Mora da se popravlja :( Nismo rodjeni Englezi pa da znamo sve do detalja. Nijedan od nas nije native speaker. Mozda FKPCascais zna bolje gramatiku. (Nightwolf87 (talk) 09:29, 5 June 2013 (UTC))
FK Partizan Good Article Reassessment
FK Partizan, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. C679 08:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
re Srbobran edits
What does "the minority is not even Hungarian" mean? The article itself states in the demographics section that Hungarians are about 20% of the municipal population and about 25% of the population in the town. So, what's the big deal with giving the Hungarian name for the town? Brianyoumans (talk) 21:44, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- You are right. I didnt knew that hungarian names can stay if they are 20%. So i ask you why can stay Serbian name not in Croatia, for example Vukovar?--Nado158 (talk) 16:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- I agree. I have posted a comment to WP:Croatia to that effect. I posted a comment to the Vukovar talk page a while back with the same idea. I will try to push harder this time. It is the right thing to do. Brianyoumans (talk) 02:29, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- The Serbian Cyrillic is now in the lede of the Vukovar article, with the agreement of the WP:Croatia group.Brianyoumans (talk) 13:40, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you very much.--Nado158 (talk) 14:21, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- I restored the Cyrillic to the Vukovar lede. I think you were trying to put in too much Cyrillic; considering how sensitive the article is, translating every single place name into Cyrrilic might be considered a little hostile by some. Brianyoumans (talk) 00:59, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Why too much Brianyoumans? Who decide this is too much and this is the limit - too much or not too much? This is I think a capitulation form WP in front of NPOV User there, because only this users see this as hostile, but what is with the thousands of Serbs who life there with their neighbours, not only in Vukovar? Is this not hostile when they have no vocie because of NPOV users on WP? You think Vukovar is the end? No. So if you think this is too much brother, than we must remove also the Hungarina and other langauges from the Infobox in Subotica, Srbobran ect., in every single Serbian place, like in Croatia the Croatian names. I think thats fair. Dont forget the other countrys ect. Is this the solution Brian? Because of this NPOV Users there i Vukovar who nobody charged? In Serbia not one day during the war and after the war and also now atack buildings with croatian or hungarian translation or names, till today. To capitulate and to forget the croatian EU-law who gave the premission to use the latin and the serbian-cyrillic eaquel on administartiv niveau ect. where life a significant Serbian minority or majority? Me and you know thats can be the right way to capitulate and to forgat the law and the WP-Rules.--Nado158 (talk) 12:24, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think trying to keep the Serbian Cyrrilic in the lede is giving up. I think Timbouktou and I are trying to do the right thing, at the right time. A year after there were riots in Vukovar over language issues might be the wrong time to insist on putting Cyrrilic everywhere in the article. No one complained about the Cyrillic in the lede until you came along and put it all over the infobox, at which point an edit war started - which doesn't benefit anyone. I think the important thing now is to include the Cyrillic; once people get used to it, we can talk about where it makes sense to have it. Sadly, from the point of view of a native English speaker, including the Cyrrilic really doesn't add much to the article - I don't read Cyrrilic, and I think that is true of maybe 98% of English language users. So this is more about establishing a principle than anything. Brianyoumans (talk) 13:40, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Why too much Brianyoumans? Who decide this is too much and this is the limit - too much or not too much? This is I think a capitulation form WP in front of NPOV User there, because only this users see this as hostile, but what is with the thousands of Serbs who life there with their neighbours, not only in Vukovar? Is this not hostile when they have no vocie because of NPOV users on WP? You think Vukovar is the end? No. So if you think this is too much brother, than we must remove also the Hungarina and other langauges from the Infobox in Subotica, Srbobran ect., in every single Serbian place, like in Croatia the Croatian names. I think thats fair. Dont forget the other countrys ect. Is this the solution Brian? Because of this NPOV Users there i Vukovar who nobody charged? In Serbia not one day during the war and after the war and also now atack buildings with croatian or hungarian translation or names, till today. To capitulate and to forget the croatian EU-law who gave the premission to use the latin and the serbian-cyrillic eaquel on administartiv niveau ect. where life a significant Serbian minority or majority? Me and you know thats can be the right way to capitulate and to forgat the law and the WP-Rules.--Nado158 (talk) 12:24, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- I restored the Cyrillic to the Vukovar lede. I think you were trying to put in too much Cyrillic; considering how sensitive the article is, translating every single place name into Cyrrilic might be considered a little hostile by some. Brianyoumans (talk) 00:59, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you very much.--Nado158 (talk) 14:21, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
- You are right. I didnt knew that hungarian names can stay if they are 20%. So i ask you why can stay Serbian name not in Croatia, for example Vukovar?--Nado158 (talk) 16:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Sorry, but also, look at the diff
I'm sorry, I didn't see I'd removed your comment. You removed a big chunk of text from the previous request in that edit. Now I see Sean Hoyland has fixed everything. Sorry for not reading the diff all the way down.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 16:33, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
June 2014
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Your repetitive violations of the edit warring policy, esp. in hot-button issues, are what caused this. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 20:00, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Nado158 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am blocked for repetitive violations of the edit warring policy, esp. in hot-button issues, are what caused this. So, you mean for sure Vukovar, but we had an conclusion with Brianyoumans and other users on WikiProjekt Croatia, that we should add the Serbian cyrillic name of Vukovar. After this, User Sokac every time delated the Serbian Cyrillic Name of Vukovar. I told him about the conclusion, but he said only: I had my own conclusion (see the Edit history of Vukovar, there you can read it). So, I revert him. Thats all, and for this I am blocked? Also, i revert with comments, not without. He deserve the block, not me, i revert because of his known vandalism. And afte my block you Joy revert also an IP and put the Serbian Cyrillic name back. So, why I am blocked for this, alltough you done also the right thing like me? Before i edit football clubs articles. I am not here for Vandalism or NPOV or POV. If you mean the namechange of football club FK Cukaricki to Cukaricki Belgrade? Ok, than i can say, that is no problem. I am good with User:FkpCascais, who revert me, because of foodball edits that we made togehtehr, and we will finde 200 % a solution. Dont forget, the English people calles Cukaricki Belgrade, like Red Star Belgrade, not Crvena Zvezda (Red Star), and on Englisch WP stood Red Star Belgrade. I can speak abut this with other User, i wanted do this, but than you blocked me? Before i edit FK Jagodina article without any problem, i am not a POV user.Thanks.Nado158 (talk) 21:46, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It is difficult to understand all of your unblock request, because of problems of English. However, essentially you seem to be saying that you should not be blocked for edit warring because your edits were justified. However, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring is, basically, "don't edit war", not "don't edit war unless you are convinced that you are right". Indeed, it would be completely meaningless to have a policy which exempted any editor who was convinced that he or she was right, as in most edit wars everybody involved thinks they are right.. It is perhaps also worth mentioning that if a group of editors choose to get together and call themselves a "Wikiproject", that does not somehow give their views more authority than the views of other editors, or give them ownership of articles on the topic that they choose to designate as their project. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I didn't notice Nado158's questions above earlier. I concur with James' explanation. I didn't try to pick and choose which revision was left in place, I merely enforced the policy on stopping the edit war. The relevant talk page has discussion that explains what an actual sensible consensus might look like; the edit-warring was largely orthogonal to that. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:06, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
I reverted Nado at FK Čukarički only because his move means to change many more clubs into English language names, so we have to agree if we will keep them like the way they are now, or we change them all. But by no means Nado´s page-move was bad or desruptive or anything. Nado, your block seems to be related to Vukovar article only. You seem to be unaware why exactly you were blocked. Joy, why exactly was Nado blocked? FkpCascais (talk) 20:48, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
I have looked at this again, and the first think that struck me was that the block was for a month, which seemed remarkably long under the circumstances, so I decided to consult the blocking administrator about the possibility of substantially shortening the block. However, before doing so, I looked back at the discussions related to this issue, so that I would be in a better position to make a reasonable suggestion to that administrator. Previously, my focus had been on looking at your editing, since I was assessing your unblock request, but for the reasons I have just described, I was now conscious of who the blocking administrator was, and I was astonished to see that that administrator had been taking part in discussion relating to the issue which led to your block, and has also been editing the article in connection with that issue. Looking further, I see that he or she has a very extensive history of editing the article. There is no circumstance at all in which an administrator should block an editor over edit warring in a disputed issue in which that administrator is involved as an editor, and so I have removed the block. Also, blocking for a month over such a minor infraction is grossly unreasonable. You were actually blocked for almost exactly two and a half days, which I regard as a much more appropriate block length than a month. I shall carefully consider whether this warrants a block on Joy for abuse of administrative powers, or merely a warning. I apologise for not checking the block length when I assessed your unblock request in the first place: I normally do so, and failing to do so this time was a mistake. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 07:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- First of all thank you for your efforts, your explanation and your good intentions, and of course for your unblocking. I am glad that you have recognized and have understood all this. That's what I want to say what you have said with your last text. Unfortunately, my English is not good enough, but I will do my best to get better. You dont must apologize for anything, you're not the first administrator who has fallen into this dead end, luckily you take the time the look closer behind this problem, thus you could see the backgrund of this problem.
- About the abuse of administrative powers. I suppose I could write a lot about it, including in relation to Joy, but I dont think that one to me as a user who works predominantly Serbian article will believe, when I would criticize a controversial Croatian Administartor who better speaks English and is better versed with WP, even if I am not alone in this.
- So, WP have a lot of administrators, and I trust in WP and its administrators with good intentions. I think you're are also as administrator who are more appropriate as me and more than inteligent enough to recognize this self. What I can say for 100%, I will try to follow in the future the rules of WP much better. Thank you, much success and all the best.Nado158 (talk) 11:20, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- I read a few unblock requests yesterday, because a bot had been blocked days ago(unblocked now). I had also read this unblock request, I tell you, I was pretty upset about the 1 month block, because this editor has been contributing for years and they don't even have a bad block history. But I was totally uninvolved, I had no opinion. @JamesBWatson: Once again I am very much impressed by you. OccultZone (Talk) 15:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Nado158, I suggest you to read WP:EW once again, you can definitely avoid such blocks. Take care, happy editing. OccultZone (Talk) 15:27, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much, i will do it, but belive me, i was also upset, but not 1% suprised about the 1 month block. Why??? I think you know it bro ;).--Nado158 (talk) 18:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
Your message on my talk page.
I have replied to your message on my talk page. Please answer my question there, so that I can judge how to deal with the situation. At present it is not entirely clear to me. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:23, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Serbian/Kosovan football topics
Please refrain from unilaterally changing articles to versions that you think are correct, as in the Trepka Stadium issue. Discuss the issues on the talk page rather than taking things into your own hands because as far as anyone reading the pages' histories are aware, you are trying to drastically change things to fit your personal view rather than one held by reliable sources.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 14:31, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- This is a lie, a big lie, nothing is my personal POV man, do you see the sources????Man what is your problem?--Nado158 (talk) 14:33, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- Your behavior in regards to the stadium article, as well as your past behavior on articles regarding the Kosovo region, has brought your actions on these two football club articles into question.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 14:39, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- Ahhh come one, this have nothing to do with this. You sitting in Miami and think yopu have knowledge about the spors history in this part? Never. So what? I never vandalized or put my POV, always i worked with soruces, so dont tell me this. Because I removed wrong things wuth yssaources it into question? Your version have no one source. In to question is your behavior without sources and arguments. I tell you, this club dont exist since 2010 and you put it in a version whic is not true and have no one source. This are two differnet clubs. You can not take the history of another club and put it in the version of a another club. So, you dont have knowledge about this.--Nado158 (talk) 14:45, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
- Your behavior in regards to the stadium article, as well as your past behavior on articles regarding the Kosovo region, has brought your actions on these two football club articles into question.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 14:39, 13 June 2014 (UTC)