Undid revision 1215744662 by The Kip (talk) Tag: Undo |
IgnatiusofLondon (talk | contribs) →Nomination of Where is Kate? for deletion: new section Tag: New topic |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
We both know that the Intercept is not such a reliable source and since this is a BLP - it should be removed. [[User:GidiD|GidiD]] ([[User talk:GidiD|talk]]) 20:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC) |
We both know that the Intercept is not such a reliable source and since this is a BLP - it should be removed. [[User:GidiD|GidiD]] ([[User talk:GidiD|talk]]) 20:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
:The Intercept is a perfectly reliable source, and your say so does not trump what a reliable source says, sorry. '''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17;font-size:90%">nableezy</span>]]''' - 22:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC) |
:The Intercept is a perfectly reliable source, and your say so does not trump what a reliable source says, sorry. '''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17;font-size:90%">nableezy</span>]]''' - 22:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Nomination of [[:Where is Kate?]] for deletion == |
|||
<div class="afd-notice"> |
|||
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article [[:Where is Kate?]] is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]]. |
|||
The article will be discussed at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination)]]''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. |
|||
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> [[User:IgnatiusofLondon|IgnatiusofLondon]] (<span style="font-size:85%;">he/him</span> • [[User talk:IgnatiusofLondon#top|☎️]]) 11:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:50, 1 April 2024
Editor experience invitation
Hi Nableezy. I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 07:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Intercept
Hi Nableezy. I speak Hebrew and listened to Anat's interview. I can honestly say that the claim of the intercept The Channel 12 podcast interview with Schwartz, which The Intercept translated from Hebrew, opens a window into the reporting process on the controversial story and suggests that The New York Times’s mission was to bolster a predetermined narrative is false.
We both know that the Intercept is not such a reliable source and since this is a BLP - it should be removed. GidiD (talk) 20:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- The Intercept is a perfectly reliable source, and your say so does not trump what a reliable source says, sorry. nableezy - 22:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of Where is Kate? for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Where is Kate? (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.IgnatiusofLondon (he/him • ☎️) 11:50, 1 April 2024 (UTC)