Content deleted Content added
→Intercept: reply Tag: CD |
Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Nableezy/Archive 55) (bot |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
{{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=yes}} |
{{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=yes}} |
||
__TOC__ |
__TOC__ |
||
== Accusation of US complicity in Israel's alleged war crimes in Gaza == |
|||
Hello Nableezy. Do you have time to take a look at [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ghazaalch/sandbox this draft] and see if it's in good shape? Feel free to add or remove any content you like.[[User:Ghazaalch|Ghazaalch]] ([[User talk:Ghazaalch|talk]]) 07:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
:Thats a lot of reading tbh, but I see it moved to article space so guess thats that anyway. '''[[User talk:Nableezy|<span style="color:#C11B17;font-size:90%">nableezy</span>]]''' - 23:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC) |
|||
== Editor experience invitation == |
== Editor experience invitation == |
Revision as of 17:56, 26 March 2024
Editor experience invitation
Hi Nableezy. I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 07:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Intercept
Hi Nableezy. I speak Hebrew and listened to Anat's interview. I can honestly say that the claim of the intercept The Channel 12 podcast interview with Schwartz, which The Intercept translated from Hebrew, opens a window into the reporting process on the controversial story and suggests that The New York Times’s mission was to bolster a predetermined narrative is false.
We both know that the Intercept is not such a reliable source and since this is a BLP - it should be removed. GidiD (talk) 20:40, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
- The Intercept is a perfectly reliable source, and your say so does not trump what a reliable source says, sorry. nableezy - 22:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC)