Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Nableezy/Archive 55) (bot |
|||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
Hi Nableezy. I'm looking for people to interview [[User:Clovermoss/Editor reflections|here]]. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. [[User:Clovermoss|<span style="color:darkorchid">Clovermoss</span><span style="color:green">🍀</span>]] [[User talk:Clovermoss|(talk)]] 07:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC) |
Hi Nableezy. I'm looking for people to interview [[User:Clovermoss/Editor reflections|here]]. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. [[User:Clovermoss|<span style="color:darkorchid">Clovermoss</span><span style="color:green">🍀</span>]] [[User talk:Clovermoss|(talk)]] 07:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC) |
||
== Intercept == |
|||
Hi Nableezy. I speak Hebrew and listened to Anat's interview. I can honestly say that the claim of the intercept ''The Channel 12 podcast interview with Schwartz, which The Intercept translated from Hebrew, opens a window into the reporting process on the controversial story and suggests that The New York Times’s mission was to bolster a predetermined narrative.'' is false. |
|||
We both know that the Intercept is not such a reliable source and since this is a BLP - it should be removed. [[User:GidiD|GidiD]] ([[User talk:GidiD|talk]]) 20:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:39, 19 March 2024
Accusation of US complicity in Israel's alleged war crimes in Gaza
Hello Nableezy. Do you have time to take a look at this draft and see if it's in good shape? Feel free to add or remove any content you like.Ghazaalch (talk) 07:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thats a lot of reading tbh, but I see it moved to article space so guess thats that anyway. nableezy - 23:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Editor experience invitation
Hi Nableezy. I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 07:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Intercept
Hi Nableezy. I speak Hebrew and listened to Anat's interview. I can honestly say that the claim of the intercept The Channel 12 podcast interview with Schwartz, which The Intercept translated from Hebrew, opens a window into the reporting process on the controversial story and suggests that The New York Times’s mission was to bolster a predetermined narrative. is false.
We both know that the Intercept is not such a reliable source and since this is a BLP - it should be removed. GidiD (talk) 20:38, 19 March 2024 (UTC)