BilledMammal (talk | contribs) |
→RFC extended confirmed: new section |
||
Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
Please self-revert the most recent. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 04:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC) |
Please self-revert the most recent. [[User:BilledMammal|BilledMammal]] ([[User talk:BilledMammal|talk]]) 04:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC) |
||
== RFC extended confirmed == |
|||
Please stop adding {{tlx|RFC extended confirmed}} to discussions, it causes breakage of the RfC listings. I have found three instances so far: |
|||
*On 17 October 2023, {{diff|Talk:List of military occupations|prev|1180522559|this addition}} triggered {{diff|Talk:List of military occupations|prev|1180523512|this edit}} with consequent damage at {{diff|Wikipedia:Requests for comment/History and geography|prev|1180523523|WP:RFC/HIST}} and {{diff|Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Unsorted|prev|1180523527|Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Unsorted}} |
|||
*On 24 October 2023, {{diff|Talk:List of Islamist terrorist attacks|prev|1181673394|this addition}} and {{diff|Talk:List of major terrorist incidents|prev|1181673466|this addition}} triggered {{diff|Talk:List of Islamist terrorist attacks|prev|1181675807|this edit}} and {{diff|Talk:List of major terrorist incidents|prev|1181675820|this edit}}, with consequent damage at {{diff|Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Politics, government, and law|prev|1181675841|WP:RFC/POL}} and {{diff|Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Unsorted|prev|1181675843|Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Unsorted}} |
|||
Thankyou for your co-operation. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] 🌹 ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 18:37, 24 October 2023 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:37, 24 October 2023
Suggested edit
Nableezy, hi. I wish to add the following edit to the article Temple Mount, in the section entitled, "Opinions of contemporary rabbis concerning entry to the site." The proper place for insertion of the edit, in my opinion, is after the sentence which reads: "Rabbinical consensus in the post-1967 period, held that it is forbidden for Jews to enter any part of the Temple Mount, and in January 2005 a declaration was signed confirming the 1967 decision."
(suggested edit) The late Chief Rabbi of Israel, Ovadia Yosef, prohibited any Jew from ascending the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, because of its extreme sanctity. [1] (End Quote)
References
- ^ Yalqut Yosef (Mo’adim – Hil. Chol ha-Mo’ed §4), edited by Rabbi Ovadia’s son, Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef; Responsa Yabia’ Omer (vol. 5, responsum no. 15, letter bet, and in responsum no. 26); Yechaveh Da’at, part 1, responsum no. 25
Davidbena (talk) 19:57, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- Think you have to stay away from this one David, I think it may be technically ok but so many parts of that are on the edge. Ovadia Yosef itself is in ARBPIA, the prohibition on entering has been a repeated hot point in discussions on the future of the Temple Mount and how committed to upholding the status quo the Israeli government is which again would be in the topic area, the very year 1967 is part of the topic area because of the 67 war and Israel's subsequent occupation, both in the topic area. Sorry, nableezy - 20:52, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- That said it may technically be ok, but I think youd be on shaky ground at AE if somebody raised it and I think you are better off staying a bit further from the edge here. But ultimately its up to you. nableezy - 20:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
are you ok?
I realize I don't actually know where you live, but I guess I thought maybe you were from Nablus, due to your name, and possibly your family? If so (or even if not!), I just wanted to drop you a line and hope you and yours are well. IronDuke 19:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Nah no Nablus association, just an Egyptian boy from the Midwest. But I hope the same for you and yours, and hope everybody you care about is staying safe wherever they are. Have friends who have family in harms way, as I imagine you might too. Take care ID, good to see your name more than once a decade now too. nableezy - 20:28, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Indeed! I hope you don't mind, I went ahead and kind of spot-reverted your last five edits. Not even sure what the substance of your edits even was, just felt like it for old time's sake. IronDuke 20:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Your method of signing posts
I'm sorry to bother you with something so minor, but your unique method of signing posts often causes mild formatting issues on mobile. I'm not sure if there's a particular reason you sign the way you do but just so you're aware in case you're not married to doing it that way. XeCyranium (talk) 23:09, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Can you explain further? nableezy - 23:56, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
- Essentially normally text strings are placed within the limits of the page and get broken up into different lines, so the page remains the same width and text stays "zoomed in" as it were. But on talk pages and the like your bordered signature doesn't get split up if it's too long to be displayed in one line so the whole page gets widened and all the text is subsequently "zoomed out". It's especially noticeable after a few indentations, where your signature can extend very far outside the normal page ranges. XeCyranium (talk) 01:57, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, sorry, but if I dont do non-breaking spaces then the box gets split between lines. If there is some way of maintaining the single line for the signature Id be happy to adjust it. nableezy - 02:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I'm not proficient enough to know if there is a way. That's fair though if you'd like to keep it as is! XeCyranium (talk) 02:56, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Ah, sorry, but if I dont do non-breaking spaces then the box gets split between lines. If there is some way of maintaining the single line for the signature Id be happy to adjust it. nableezy - 02:15, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- Essentially normally text strings are placed within the limits of the page and get broken up into different lines, so the page remains the same width and text stays "zoomed in" as it were. But on talk pages and the like your bordered signature doesn't get split up if it's too long to be displayed in one line so the whole page gets widened and all the text is subsequently "zoomed out". It's especially noticeable after a few indentations, where your signature can extend very far outside the normal page ranges. XeCyranium (talk) 01:57, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Scientelensia
Hi,
Just to let you know that I have updated my statement on the arbitration board. Thanks for your support in a difficult and stressful situation. Scientelensia (talk) 13:37, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Edit
@Nableezy:, with your permission, I would like to add a sentence to the article al-Ahli Arab Hospital, in the section "History," immediately following the words, "Southern Baptist Church." The additional edit, with your permission, will read as follows: "known then as the Baptist Hospital (Arabic: المستشفى المعمداني)." (End Quote).
BTW, there is currently no ARBPIA tag on this article.Davidbena (talk) 22:05, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
- that’s fine David hope you’re well. nableezy - 23:17, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
Thank you
Thank you for letting me know, so I had a chance to self-revert [1], just in case, even though I disagree than my edits were reverts. My very best wishes (talk) 18:58, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Israeli occupation of the West Bank
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Israeli occupation of the West Bank you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SurferSquall -- SurferSquall (talk) 01:23, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi Nableezy,
You seem to have made two reverts within 24 hours at this article:
Please self-revert the most recent. BilledMammal (talk) 04:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
RFC extended confirmed
Please stop adding {{RFC extended confirmed}}
to discussions, it causes breakage of the RfC listings. I have found three instances so far:
- On 17 October 2023, this addition triggered this edit with consequent damage at WP:RFC/HIST and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Unsorted
- On 24 October 2023, this addition and this addition triggered this edit and this edit, with consequent damage at WP:RFC/POL and Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Unsorted
Thankyou for your co-operation. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 18:37, 24 October 2023 (UTC)