Content deleted Content added
→Hello: reply |
71.72.151.150 (talk) No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[User:WeXio|WeXio]] ([[User talk:WeXio|talk]]) 22:58, 8 May 2012 (UTC) |
[[User:WeXio|WeXio]] ([[User talk:WeXio|talk]]) 22:58, 8 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
:Okay. Yes, it may be possible to make a case for its inclusion if it is made clear that it comes from the advertising campaign. I would, however, be inclined to leave it out unless any particular nugget has attracted the attention of other sources. This seems like one of those cases where the stuff is interesting, but trifling. I'll let you respond how you wish; however, if you choose to include it, I'd recommend providing substantive sources and making a case for its longevity on the article's talk page. <small><font face="Tahoma">[[User:NTox|NTox]] · [[User_talk:NTox|talk]]</font></small> 23:09, 8 May 2012 (UTC) |
:Okay. Yes, it may be possible to make a case for its inclusion if it is made clear that it comes from the advertising campaign. I would, however, be inclined to leave it out unless any particular nugget has attracted the attention of other sources. This seems like one of those cases where the stuff is interesting, but trifling. I'll let you respond how you wish; however, if you choose to include it, I'd recommend providing substantive sources and making a case for its longevity on the article's talk page. <small><font face="Tahoma">[[User:NTox|NTox]] · [[User_talk:NTox|talk]]</font></small> 23:09, 8 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
What on Earth are you talking about? I made no joke.--[[Special:Contributions/71.72.151.150|71.72.151.150]] ([[User talk:71.72.151.150|talk]]) 04:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:01, 14 May 2012
I'm not for one moment disputing the matter, but, purely out of curiosity, why did you redirect this to Pithecellobium dulce? -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:01, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for asking. According to article Pithecellobium dulce (par. 2), jungle jalebi is the Hindi name for the plant that produces the fruit that u:Chinchan2000 appeared to be referring to with the "jangaljalebe" name (note the absence of that exact term in a Google search, and his mention of "fruit"). Naturally, then, it would probably fall under the usual purposes of redirects as a likely misspelling. NTox · talk 07:24, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- Well spotted!.. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 08:46, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello
It is trivia facts, so the only "documentation" is the commercials (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IxgiTeXKOOc). Maybe it should be stated more clearly that the facts are "information given about the most interesting man in the world in the campaign"? WeXio (talk) 22:58, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
- Okay. Yes, it may be possible to make a case for its inclusion if it is made clear that it comes from the advertising campaign. I would, however, be inclined to leave it out unless any particular nugget has attracted the attention of other sources. This seems like one of those cases where the stuff is interesting, but trifling. I'll let you respond how you wish; however, if you choose to include it, I'd recommend providing substantive sources and making a case for its longevity on the article's talk page. NTox · talk 23:09, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
What on Earth are you talking about? I made no joke.--71.72.151.150 (talk) 04:01, 14 May 2012 (UTC)