Line 80: | Line 80: | ||
Remember this guy[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NJA&oldid=344796746#Block-evading_IP_.28Part_2.29], he is back under a new range [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/193.255.177.76], could you please range-block 193.255.***.** as well, as this new IP range is probably his place of work. --[[User:Kurdo777|Kurdo777]] ([[User talk:Kurdo777|talk]]) 09:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC) |
Remember this guy[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NJA&oldid=344796746#Block-evading_IP_.28Part_2.29], he is back under a new range [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/193.255.177.76], could you please range-block 193.255.***.** as well, as this new IP range is probably his place of work. --[[User:Kurdo777|Kurdo777]] ([[User talk:Kurdo777|talk]]) 09:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC) |
||
:This is an silly ethnicity dispute and Kurdo is a part of the problem. The IP user is adding Turkestan to the regions and kurdo is removing it although non of the regions is referenced. I [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Al-Farabi&diff=344799594&oldid=344796330 tried] to de-emphasize ethnicity in the article but was met with resistance. [[User:Sole Soul|Sole Soul]] ([[User talk:Sole Soul|talk]]) 10:19, 24 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:19, 24 February 2010
Welcome to NJA's talk page! Please click to leave me a new message. |
---|
Ulterior (Band)
Hi NJA,
RE: 10:26, 22 February 2010 NJA (talk | contribs) deleted "Ulterior (band)" (Speedy deleted per CSD A7, was an article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble that didn't assert the importance or significance of the subject.)
My friend and I compiled the article, both of us newbies to Wikipedia. Could you please highlight what you deem unimportant or of no significance please?
Any help or guidance would be very appreciated
Ulteriorlondon (talk) 21:29, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- I've replied on your talk page. Aside from those concerns, your name may violate WP:GROUPNAME and it raises conflict of icnterest concerns. Anyhow, the deleted article can be found here to be improved in line with the guidance at WP:MUSIC. NJA (t/c) 21:35, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick reply. I think the new edit may suffice... is there a way to send it to you before publishing?
Ulteriorlondon (talk) 00:33, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Whaling in Japan
Hi. I don't think Whaling in Japan needs to be locked. I actually had too many reverts (over a few different lines) than I like but talk is going on fine. PrBeacon half reverted but it was more of editing to find consensus since I reverted his large edit but he wanted to adjust the lead. I also might have been hasty in reverting his other edit but there seemed like enough opposition. We seem pretty reasonable from my understanding of everyone on the page. Would you mind unlocking it and I for one will chill out the reverts until it is all setlled?Cptnono (talk) 08:11, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- No issue really, just come to a consensus on the article's talk page and it will be unprotected. I have your agreement here, but it'd be best to seek agreement on the article talk page so the other parties can see it and agree to also stop reverting. Once all are agreed to stop reverting then we can unprotect. Cheers, NJA (t/c) 08:14, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the message on the related talk page. The take/catch/kill/smash thing is up at a noticeboard now. I didn't realize the "research whaling" thing was also going to be a sticking point. I guess I won't be bugging you like I thought.Cptnono (talk) 09:02, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
The Inevitable Flight
I am updating the article and please look through the sites . MAybe im missing something but its not a hoax. thoughts ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by EssRiz (talk • contribs) 16:07, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
RIM IP Block
I think it depends on how you sign up for the Blackberry. I just verified that my own Blackberry edits WHOIS to RIM directly as well, and not to my phone ISP ... (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:49, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- That's good to know and it's quite interesting actually. Regardless, the IP should be handled carefully as they knew a lot of terminology for being a new user who was affected by a check user block. Cheers for the info. NJA (t/c) 17:52, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, I concur. The unblock request came from some random IP at Humber College, and not from the RIM range. Interesting to note that only some of the RIM range is actually blocked - they may assign them to various ISP's, although, the guy from Humber is either on Bell, Telus or Rogers ... one of those three is the same one that I am on, and I'm not blocked (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the revert!
Never been called a Nazi before. Favonian (talk) 17:51, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Hamid Sadr
Hi NJA, You speedily deleted a contribution abut the writer Hamid Sadr because the article did not assert the significance. I give you several links now and ask you to check the importance of this writer once more. http://www.hanser-literaturverlage.de/autoren/autor.html?id=25369http://www.goethe.de/INS/ie/dub/acv/lit/2007/de2710543v.htm http://foreignrights.hanser.de/detail.asp?ISBN=3-552-06006-5&verlag=Zsolnay%20/%20Deuticke&zuordnung=Fiction&sortierung=Name; further on I quote some German magazines who have written a review about one of his books: ZUKUNFT, 2006;LITERATUR und KRITIK September 2005; DIE FURCHE September 2005,NEUE ZÜRICHER ZEITUNG Juli 2005; Hamid Sadr is no unknown in the German and Persian literature and so I ask you to revice your decision. Thank you, kind regards, Akinom 1953 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Akinom1953 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Final discussion for Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:
- Proposal to Close This RfC
- Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy
Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip 03:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Indonesian vandal alert.
Sorry to bother you, but the Indonesian anime/movie studio vandal had returned today, this time using 125.161.141.51 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) and did only one edit. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 07:58, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Block-evading IP (Part 3)
Remember this guy[1], he is back under a new range [2], could you please range-block 193.255.***.** as well, as this new IP range is probably his place of work. --Kurdo777 (talk) 09:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- This is an silly ethnicity dispute and Kurdo is a part of the problem. The IP user is adding Turkestan to the regions and kurdo is removing it although non of the regions is referenced. I tried to de-emphasize ethnicity in the article but was met with resistance. Sole Soul (talk) 10:19, 24 February 2010 (UTC)