Content deleted Content added
→My ban appeal: not a good idea |
TheShadowCrow (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
::The consensus was 3-2 and the discussion hadn't been up for even a day. --[[User:TheShadowCrow|TheShadowCrow]] ([[User talk:TheShadowCrow|talk]]) 01:07, 22 April 2013 (UTC) |
::The consensus was 3-2 and the discussion hadn't been up for even a day. --[[User:TheShadowCrow|TheShadowCrow]] ([[User talk:TheShadowCrow|talk]]) 01:07, 22 April 2013 (UTC) |
||
:::No, you've got BWilkins, Boing! Said Zebedee, Dennis Brown, BearMan, Drmies and Giantsnowman trending against, plus you're attacking editors with comments like "fictional" accounts. The most likely outcome if you pursue engaging the way you have is for sanctions to be ''expanded,'' not reduced. <small>[[User talk:NE Ent|NE Ent]]</small> 01:18, 22 April 2013 (UTC) |
:::No, you've got BWilkins, Boing! Said Zebedee, Dennis Brown, BearMan, Drmies and Giantsnowman trending against, plus you're attacking editors with comments like "fictional" accounts. The most likely outcome if you pursue engaging the way you have is for sanctions to be ''expanded,'' not reduced. <small>[[User talk:NE Ent|NE Ent]]</small> 01:18, 22 April 2013 (UTC) |
||
::::Who did I call fictional? I said claims against me are fictional (or lies), such as Snowman's claim I have made POINTy editing, something I have never done, just his biased opinion. Like many others, you don't seem to know anything. Renew the discussion. --[[User:TheShadowCrow|TheShadowCrow]] ([[User talk:TheShadowCrow|talk]]) 17:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== A barnstar for you! == |
== A barnstar for you! == |
Revision as of 17:21, 22 April 2013
BUSY BUSY in REAL LIFE
Last word: TheShadowCrow (talk).
Archives
|
---|
My ban appeal
I had something to add. Will you unclose it? --TheShadowCrow (talk) 14:21, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- Probably ... but it's a really bad idea. Wikipedia is a political place and you don't have any support at all right now. Best bet is to just contribute in other areas without getting into conflict with other editors for awhile -- at least three months or so, but six would be better. NE Ent 23:40, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
- The consensus was 3-2 and the discussion hadn't been up for even a day. --TheShadowCrow (talk) 01:07, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- No, you've got BWilkins, Boing! Said Zebedee, Dennis Brown, BearMan, Drmies and Giantsnowman trending against, plus you're attacking editors with comments like "fictional" accounts. The most likely outcome if you pursue engaging the way you have is for sanctions to be expanded, not reduced. NE Ent 01:18, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- Who did I call fictional? I said claims against me are fictional (or lies), such as Snowman's claim I have made POINTy editing, something I have never done, just his biased opinion. Like many others, you don't seem to know anything. Renew the discussion. --TheShadowCrow (talk) 17:21, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- No, you've got BWilkins, Boing! Said Zebedee, Dennis Brown, BearMan, Drmies and Giantsnowman trending against, plus you're attacking editors with comments like "fictional" accounts. The most likely outcome if you pursue engaging the way you have is for sanctions to be expanded, not reduced. NE Ent 01:18, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
- The consensus was 3-2 and the discussion hadn't been up for even a day. --TheShadowCrow (talk) 01:07, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
I appreciate you standing up for me. Thanks for that. I dare say some admins could learn much about integrity from you. Take care! ~ DanielTom (talk) 00:47, 21 April 2013 (UTC) |
CheckUser
My comment was a joke... but thanks for the welcome anyways. --FrigidNinja 03:29, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
More bullying by the ultra-nationalists
here. LittleBen (talk) 08:29, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Qualification
Hi, Treebeard. In case it needs saying: I obviously don't think myself entitled to "topic ban" you from anywhere, or tell you what to do altogether. I just wanted to ask you to think about that figure you gave. Just availing myself of the time-honoured Wikipedia culture of interferingness. Bishonen | talk 13:19, 21 April 2013 (UTC).
- Perhaps you might want to add the sarcasm tag to your ANI post, as the edit summary also might perk some ears. little green rosetta(talk)
central scrutinizer 13:24, 21 April 2013 (UTC)- I try to avoid the "now laugh, please" tags. Plus it wasn't sarcasm exactly; it was bona fide advice that I think it would do our friend good to consider. Plus also, the semi-quotes there from the regulation unblock template should be a bit of a giveaway (
"If you would like to be unbanned, you may appeal this ban by adding the text.."
). Plus thirdly, I don't care that much if some other person misunderstands my tone. No, seriously. I don't want any risk of NE misunderstanding it, and so I post here. If anybody else is outraged, I expect they'll protest and then they can gently be put right. Pedantic answer, sorry, but no tags. Bishonen | talk 13:42, 21 April 2013 (UTC).
- I try to avoid the "now laugh, please" tags. Plus it wasn't sarcasm exactly; it was bona fide advice that I think it would do our friend good to consider. Plus also, the semi-quotes there from the regulation unblock template should be a bit of a giveaway (