ImperialAficionado (talk | contribs) |
ImperialAficionado (talk | contribs) 3rr |
||
Line 4:
{{uw-vandalism2|Ghurid campaigns in India}}[[User:ImperialAficionado|<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; color:Purple;">Imperial</span>]][[User talk:ImperialAficionado|<span style="font-family: 'Garamond'; color:Darkblue;"><sup><nowiki>[AFCND]</nowiki></sup></span>]] 13:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Ghurid campaigns in India]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about [[WP:EPTALK|how this is done]]. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->--[[User:ImperialAficionado|<span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; color:Purple;">Imperial</span>]][[User talk:ImperialAficionado|<span style="font-family: 'Garamond'; color:Darkblue;"><sup><nowiki>[AFCND]</nowiki></sup></span>]] 13:41, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
|
Revision as of 13:41, 4 March 2024
March 2024
Hello, I'm ImperialAficionado. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ghaznavid campaigns in India have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Imperial[AFCND] 13:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ghurid campaigns in India. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.Imperial[AFCND] 13:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Ghurid campaigns in India shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--Imperial[AFCND] 13:41, 4 March 2024 (UTC)