February with Women in Red
Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Violations of WP:DRAFTIFY
According to WP:DRAFTOBJECT, A page may only be moved unilaterally to the draftspace a single time. You moved Gerceida E. Adams-Jones to draft space twice, on December 26 and again on January 14. Both moves were bad: Adams-Jones very obviously passes WP:PROF#C3, as a fellow of a major academic society, and the article has already been cleaned up by established editors. Please stop your disruptive edits and violation of established procedures. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:58, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hello David Eppstein. Thank you for the explanation, I was not aware of that part of the guideline. MrsSnoozyTurtle 00:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- It is difficult to tell what you might be aware of because of your habit of removing past warnings to pay more attention to the draftification guidelines such as the one at [1]. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Deb. Many thanks for your kind message and for understanding that mistakes sometimes happen. All the best, MrsSnoozyTurtle 21:33, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hello- I saw you recently voted Keep for Mario Cerrito. It was quickly closed after your Keep vote- and what I’m guessing is out of spite. The closer describes himself as a deletionist and I think he saw that it was leaning towards a Keep consensus. We laid out the facts and they ignored it. It was relisted to get a better consensus which was supposed to expire this Wednesday. I’m not a very experienced editor but I see you are. I don’t think it was handled right. WexfordUK (talk) 02:35, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hello WexfordUK, please see my reply at Seraphimblade's Talk Page. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 05:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Response to Proposed deletion for FoodBeeper article
Hello, I’ve seen that you proposed the deletion of my article FoodBeeper, and stated that it’s promotional and that I’m a SPA. I negate all your assumptions. My article is not promotional, it adheres to all of Wikipedia policies, notability, POV, and especially verifiability. As for the statement of me being a SPA, I’ve declared in my user page that I’ll be covering topics related to Algeria (my mother country)’s economy and digital growth because they are relevant to my interest and are also rarely dealt with on Wikipedia. I should also mention that I’m active on the French Wikipedia where I contribute to everything related to Algeria’s e-commerce and technological development. Please reconsider your deletion proposal. Regards, Rymknows23 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 12:19, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
March editathons
Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The Signpost: 27 February 2022
- From the team: Selection of a new Signpost Editor-in-Chief
- News and notes: Impacts of Russian invasion of Ukraine
- Special report: A presidential candidate's team takes on Wikipedia
- In the media: Wiki-drama in the UK House of Commons
- Technology report: Community Wishlist Survey results
- WikiProject report: 10 years of tea
- Featured content: Featured Content returns
- Deletion report: The 10 most SHOCKING deletion discussions of February
- Recent research: How editors and readers may be emotionally affected by disasters and terrorist attacks
- Arbitration report: Parties remonstrate, arbs contemplate, skeptics coordinate
- Gallery: The vintage exhibit
- Traffic report: Euphoria, Pamela Anderson, lies and Netflix
- News from Diff: The Wikimania 2022 Core Organizing Team
- Crossword: A Crossword, featuring Featured Articles
- Humour: Notability of mailboxes