If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.
Thank you!
|
|||||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Tire recycling
At Tire_recycling you removed an addition made by me stating as the reason "backlink farming". The information added was obviously relevant to the topic and the page did not have that particular piece of information. Can you please explain how exactly specifying the substantial released when tires are burnt can possibly be a link farming? You also keep removing my reference at Tire_rotation for the same reason? Is owning the reference reason for removal even though it includes relevant information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjamin Murr (talk • contribs)
- I didn't revert you at Tire recycling, that was someone else. But you can expect that you will be reverted by multiple people as long as you're spamming blog links. - MrOllie (talk) 17:32, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
RfC on racial hereditarianism at the R&I talk-page
An RfC at Talk:Race and intelligence revisits the question, considered last year at WP:FTN, of whether or not the theory that a genetic link exists between race and intelligence is a fringe theory. This RfC supercedes the recent RfC on this topic at WP:RSN that was closed as improperly formulated.
Your participation is welcome. Thank you. NightHeron (talk) 21:09, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
- )
Saffysprocket (talk) 09:49, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Z1 Storage
Recently you complained about me adding Z1 Storage on Amazon S3 wiki, under the S3 API compatible suppliers section.
Reply:
Hello there, Z1 Storage is an S3 compatible data cloud provider in Africa, as the page has numerous other providers listed, it's only logical Z1 Storage's link can remain there as well? . Nofollow for URLs is perfectly fine, I'd still like to have that edit on the page. Thanks, Z1 Storage — Preceding unsigned comment added by Z1 Storage (talk • contribs) 13:48, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Z1 Storage, Wikipedia is not a venue for your to promote your business, and it is not an external link directory. MrOllie (talk) 13:50, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Reply:
I know it's not an external link directory :) Z1 Storage is a S3 Compatible cloud storage provider in Africa. Why can't we have it under the S3 compatible section? We are S3 API compatible, in fact, the majority of our service runs this way. --Z1 Storage (talk) 13:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Z1 Storage, I just removed the whole list. Since Wikipedia is not a directory, we should not be maintaining lists of competitors. MrOllie (talk) 13:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Reply: Alright at least it fair now. Have a good one further. --Z1 Storage (talk) 14:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Iovate
Hi there MrOllie
We are correcting outdated information from several years ago, all of which has been cited and take a neutral slant. Certain brand ambassadors have not been with our company for several years (since Obama was President and Harper PM), while others are new. Our company was sold several years ago and yet the "community's" Hydroxycut page does not note this until we made said edits. Also of note, we did not stand to correct or edit any of the negative information out there on the platform, which has been sourced. Iovatehealth (talk) 23:19, 5 May 2021 (UTC) JD at Iovate
- Please read all the guidelines that were linked for you, you should avoid editing the article directly and use talk page suggestions from now on. Wikipedia is not a social media site, and it is not a place to do promotional writing about your company. - MrOllie (talk) 23:35, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
J. Hutton Pulitizer
Hello,
You reverted the recent creation of a page for the public figure J. Hutton Pulitizer, claiming the article was "blatantly promotional." Can you please cite your concerns so that this change can be reverted? Wikipedia itself mentions on the now non-existent page that, "It is a topic more specific than currently provided on the target page or section of that page, and so a subject that may be suitable for expansion in accordance with Wikipedia's policy on biographies of notable people."
Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Loltardo (talk • contribs) 16:43, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
- Loltardo, It was full of promotional language (' highly active technology start-up founder'), ('prolific inventor'), ('11 billion devices utilizing his vast patent portfolio') are just a few examples. More importantly it had zero independent biographical sources. IMDB is not a usable source at all (its bios are written by the subjects), and the rest of the sourcing was either similarly unreliable or trivial coverage. It did not meet Wikipedia's minimum notability requirements. MrOllie (talk) 17:17, 6 May 2021 (UTC)