I'm outta here
I have had many frustrations with Wikipedia but what finally told me it was time to leave was the "discussion" over including mentions of the homeopathic usage of plants in various articles, e.g.,here, here, and here. I have further summarized my thoughts here.
When editors with botanical expertise are not permitted to add neutral and factually correct botanical information from the botanical literature to Wikipedia's botanical articles, and editors whose sole interest in those same botanical articles appears to be censorship prevail, then something is seriously wrong. There are far, far too many editors whose interest in Wikipedia is not presenting factual information, but rather managing that information to validate their own POV. MrDarwin (talk) 17:11, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes. And the botanical editors are really the targets these days.
- Mr. Darwin, I've missed you. How can you leave, when I just got back? But, of course, I understand your frustration at having to contend with the utterly ridiculous in order to edit articles. --KP Botany (talk) 04:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC)