Adding sockpuppetry block notice per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ Moseron |
m Unblock Request |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{unblock|1=I have been using other account User:Linear7 along with my main account. I'm new at Wiki community, not aware of Wikipedia guidelines. Also, I'll disclose my COI according to Wikipedia guidelines. I never reverted edits from 2nd account or involved in a Edit war. From now, i'll not use my 2nd account. I'm requesting to unblock me, would like to defend the pages I created earlier. Thanks. }} |
|||
{{Talk header}} |
{{Talk header}} |
||
Revision as of 10:41, 6 December 2017
Moseron (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have been using other account User:Linear7 along with my main account. I'm new at Wiki community, not aware of Wikipedia guidelines. Also, I'll disclose my COI according to Wikipedia guidelines. I never reverted edits from 2nd account or involved in a Edit war. From now, i'll not use my 2nd account. I'm requesting to unblock me, would like to defend the pages I created earlier. Thanks. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been using other account User:Linear7 along with my main account. I'm new at Wiki community, not aware of Wikipedia guidelines. Also, I'll disclose my COI according to Wikipedia guidelines. I never reverted edits from 2nd account or involved in a Edit war. From now, i'll not use my 2nd account. I'm requesting to unblock me, would like to defend the pages I created earlier. Thanks. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been using other account User:Linear7 along with my main account. I'm new at Wiki community, not aware of Wikipedia guidelines. Also, I'll disclose my COI according to Wikipedia guidelines. I never reverted edits from 2nd account or involved in a Edit war. From now, i'll not use my 2nd account. I'm requesting to unblock me, would like to defend the pages I created earlier. Thanks. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 12)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Moseron/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! Moseron,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispering 21:52, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
|
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Moseron/sandbox
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:Moseron/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Whispering 21:52, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 13)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Moseron/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 13)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Moseron/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Moseron. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. KH-1 (talk) 23:59, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 25)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Moseron/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the .
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Moseron. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Lightricks, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Icewhiz (talk) 10:27, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Moseron. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Enlight Videoleap, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Icewhiz (talk) 12:01, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Moseron. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Enlight Photofox, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Icewhiz (talk) 12:02, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Lightricks for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lightricks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lightricks until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Icewhiz (talk) 08:50, 3 December 2017 (UTC)