Content deleted Content added
→unblock: - Decline. |
Moby Dick~enwiki (talk | contribs) archive to history |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Moby_Dick&oldid=71065369 archive] |
|||
Please leave a message at the beep... "Beep" --[[User:Moby Dick|Moby]] |
|||
== http://www.monkeyforestubud.com/ == |
|||
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did in [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_directory|Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links]] nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See [[Wikipedia:External links|the external links guideline]] and [[Wikipedia:Spam|spam policies]] for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|welcome page]] to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:Spam --> —— [[user:Eagle 101|Eagle]] ([[user_talk:Eagle 101|ask me for '''help''']]) 09:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
: I do not feel that this is an innappropriate link for the [[Ubud]] article. The Sacred Monkey Forest is a major temple complex and the site was put up by the the local banjar (village government). They probably should have used .org. As the talk page is inactive, there is no one to talk to about this there. I'm going to re-add the link and hope you will talk to me before simply removing it again. --[[User:Moby Dick|Moby]] 09:53, 12 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:: Moby Dick I am going to trust you here. But you must know that I am merely reverting suspicious links. Sorry if you got caught up with the rest of the spam. —— [[user:Eagle 101|Eagle]] ([[user_talk:Eagle 101|ask me for '''help''']]) 09:54, 12 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
::: Thanks, I understand that link spam is a problem. I was there last year and just noticed the site the other day (it is brand new). --[[User:Moby Dick|Moby]] 10:02, 12 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
==[[Conch Republic]]== |
|||
Please don't make silly statements concerning the purported currency of this micronation. There is plenty of available [http://www.usns.info/coin-conch.html evidence to the contrary]. --[[User:Gene Poole|Gene_poole]] 22:00, 7 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Cool Cat == |
|||
You've made three edits in two days that relate to Cool Cat in one way or another. This is in direct violation of your [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Moby_Dick#Moby_Dick_prohibited_from_harassing_Cool_Cat_or_Megaman_Zero Arbcom ruling]. I have blocked you for one week from editing. [[User:Bastique|Bastiq<span style="color:#EEA3D3;font-size:14pt">▼</span>e]] <sup>[[User talk:Bastique|demandez]]</sup> 20:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
:The three edits in question were: |
|||
:#Moby remarking "makes for interesting reading!" below a link to his RfAr case (but note the [[Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Moby_Dick|consensus where this was discussed]]: Moby was legitimately responding to his own name being brought up); and |
|||
:#Moby's participation in [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Elaragirl|RFC:Elaragirl]] – endorsing the summary of [[User:Elaragirl|Elaragirl]] – Moby's [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Elaragirl#Rather_Upset_Subnote_to_Response|"Well said, Elaragirl" remark, among 12 other endorsements]]... (you do '''''not''''' cite Moby's [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Elaragirl#Outside_view_by_Doug_Bell|no-comment endorsement]] of [[User:Doug Bell|Doug Bell]]'s summary, or Moby's [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Elaragirl#Outside_view_by_Swatjester|"ya, rfc wo merit" endorsement]] of [[User:Swatjester|Swatjester]]'s summary); and |
|||
:#Moby's supportive post to [[User_talk:Elaragirl/Archive_4|the user talk page of Elaragirl]], who was being accused by Cool Cat. |
|||
:I don't see where the ArbCom forbade Moby to respond where someone else brings up his name, or to endorse summaries on RfC's, or to write to other people Cool Cat has attacked. These cannot reasonably be termed "[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User:Moby_Dick harassment of Cool Cat]" – but you have done so anyway, just as Cool Cat claimed "[[Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Moby_Dick#Nov_2006|harassment]]" over the complaint that CC had repeatedly blanked and then protected Moby's user page, where clearly the harassment was in the other direction. |
|||
:No neutral admin chose to declare the above-cited posts "harassment" in open discussion, or to block Moby. ''You'' declared them such elsewhere, in a [[Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Moby_Dick#Log_of_blocks_and_bans|post you wouldn't even sign your own name to]]. And ''you'' are '''''not''''' a neutral admin. |
|||
:Bastique, you nominated Cool Cat for Commons admin [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators/Requests_and_votes/Cool_Cat_%2802%29], and have since then loyally defended him from repeated complaints of admin abuse as merely "errors of judgment" [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Archive_2#Questionable_use_of_admin_powers_by_Cool_Cat] [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Disputes#Complaint_about_abuse_of_adminship_by_Cool_Cat]... while cautioning or even threatening to block those who bring up these complaints [same cites], so complaining of Cool Cat's admin abuse is clearly a much more severe offense to you than CC's admin abuse itself. |
|||
:This shows you to be partial, not impartial. You should have recused yourself as an admin in every issue involving Cool Cat, due to your conflict of interest, not jumped in to exert your admin powers on his behalf – which constitutes admin abuse on ''your'' part. |
|||
:I urge you to withdraw your block of Moby Dick, and to apologize to him for your most improper action, and not to repeat this unseemly partiality in your official actions. |
|||
:Yours has not been the fair and impartial behavior one expects of a [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Stewards/elections_2006-2#Bastique_.28Cary_Bass.29 leading candidate for Steward]. <small>– [[User:SAJordan|''SAJordan'']] <sup>[[User talk:SAJordan|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/SAJordan|contribs]]</sub> ''09:39, 9 Dec 2006 (UTC).''</small> |
|||
::Bastique, I now see that you also [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Elaragirl&diff=93000511&oldid=92926463 altered Moby's endorsement] to delete evidentiary links Moby was offering to Elaragirl's summary list – in effect, you destroyed evidence that the RfC participants might otherwise have seen. This could unfortunately suggest another possible motive for your blocking Moby: to keep Moby from restoring the links or drawing attention to their deletion. It was not your place to alter others' endorsements, or remove their links, on that RfC. <small>– [[User:SAJordan|''SAJordan'']] <sup>[[User talk:SAJordan|talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/SAJordan|contribs]]</sub> ''10:37, 9 Dec 2006 (UTC).''</small> |
|||
== unblock == |
|||
{{unblock reviewed|1=This block is unjustified, is being discussed all over (AN/I, for example), and I am unable to participate.|decline=You can respond via this talk page, as is customary for blocked users. Someone will transfer your comments over if they feel that they're relevant. -- [[User:Ral315|Ral315]] ([[User talk:Ral315|talk]]) 14:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)}} |
|||
: and thanks, [[User:SAJordan]]. --[[User:Moby Dick|Moby]] 07:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC) |