Content deleted Content added
Milliongoldcoinpoint (talk | contribs) |
Milliongoldcoinpoint (talk | contribs) →Replacing sourced text with original research: aware of the edit,not OR when you quote directly from the source. |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
In this edit you made the claim that a primary source was a systematic review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Acupuncture&diff=next&oldid=614698375]. Please be more careful. [[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 11:01, 28 June 2014 (UTC) |
In this edit you made the claim that a primary source was a systematic review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Acupuncture&diff=next&oldid=614698375]. Please be more careful. [[User:Jmh649|<span style="color:#0000f1">'''Doc James'''</span>]] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 11:01, 28 June 2014 (UTC) |
||
:Yes, yes I did. I think we can agree I've made plenty of great edits since starting on the page, but this was clearly not one of them. Thanks for pointing it out![[User:Milliongoldcoinpoint|Milliongoldcoinpoint]] ([[User talk:Milliongoldcoinpoint#top|talk]]) 14:12, 28 June 2014 (UTC) |
:Yes, yes I did. I think we can agree I've made plenty of great edits since starting on the page, but this was clearly not one of them. Thanks for pointing it out![[User:Milliongoldcoinpoint|Milliongoldcoinpoint]] ([[User talk:Milliongoldcoinpoint#top|talk]]) 14:12, 28 June 2014 (UTC) |
||
== Replacing sourced text with original research == |
|||
This edit you claim "rewording to better reflect on conclusions in citation"[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Acupuncture&diff=614647071&oldid=614610926] but you replaced sourced text with original research and thus [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Acupuncture&diff=next&oldid=614647384 were reverted]. Please edit more carefully. [[User:QuackGuru|<font color="Red">QuackGuru</font>]] ([[User talk:QuackGuru|<span style="color:red">talk</span>]]) 11:16, 28 June 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:14, 28 June 2014
Poor quality edit
In this edit you made the claim that a primary source was a systematic review [1]. Please be more careful. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 11:01, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, yes I did. I think we can agree I've made plenty of great edits since starting on the page, but this was clearly not one of them. Thanks for pointing it out!Milliongoldcoinpoint (talk) 14:12, 28 June 2014 (UTC)