Content deleted Content added
→ITN/C: one more thing |
→ITN/C: clarified |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:I've already [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Elen_of_the_Roads&diff=prev&oldid=420393469 explained] today how I got to the ITN page, but I will repeat it one more time here at my talk page: |
:I've already [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Elen_of_the_Roads&diff=prev&oldid=420393469 explained] today how I got to the ITN page, but I will repeat it one more time here at my talk page: |
||
:I was going to nominate the discussed article for DYK. A few days ago [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Did_you_know#Itamar_attack I commented on a DYK nomination for an article of a similar subject]. One of the reasons [[:user:gatoclass]] used in his "maybe" vote was that the article was nominated for ITN. So before making DYK nomination for this new article I decided to make sure this article is not nominated for ITN, and it was how I got to ITN page. |
:I was going to nominate the discussed article for DYK. A few days ago [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Did_you_know#Itamar_attack I commented on a DYK nomination for an article of a similar subject]. One of the reasons [[:user:gatoclass]] used in his "maybe" vote was that the article was nominated for ITN. So before making DYK nomination for this new article I decided to make sure this article is not nominated for ITN, and it was how I got to ITN page. |
||
:HJ, if now after I explained to you what happened, you believe my conduct deserves a block I will accept your decision with no complains because I trust you to be a fair administrator, and honestly because I am tired of being the subject of "If in doubt, blame Mbz1" |
:HJ, if now after I explained to you what happened, you believe my conduct deserves a block I will accept your decision with no complains because I trust you to be a fair administrator, and honestly because I am tired of being the subject of "If in doubt, blame Mbz1", and of course I assure you I would not complain if you are to block [[:user:Passionless]] :-) |
||
:On the other hand , if you'd really like to help to solve the situation between [[:user:passionless]] and me, it could be solved with an interaction ban established between the two of us as it [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=418170440 was proposed] by [[user:AGK]] already. I am for this with both my hands. Thanks.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 03:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC) |
:On the other hand , if you'd really like to help to solve the situation between [[:user:passionless]] and me, it could be solved with an interaction ban established between the two of us as it [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=418170440 was proposed] by [[user:AGK]] already. I am for this with both my hands. Thanks.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 03:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC) |
||
::Forgot to say that [[:user:passionless]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Huldra&diff=prev&oldid=420413719 is going to take me to AE]. May I please ask you one more time to consider an interaction ban? I believe everybody and most of all the community would only benefit from this. I believe sooner or later it will be imposed anyway, so it is better to do it rather sooner than later.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 03:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC) |
::Forgot to say that [[:user:passionless]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Huldra&diff=prev&oldid=420413719 is going to take me to AE]. May I please ask you one more time to consider an interaction ban? I believe everybody and most of all the community would only benefit from this. I believe sooner or later it will be imposed anyway, so it is better to do it rather sooner than later.--[[User:Mbz1|Mbz1]] ([[User talk:Mbz1#top|talk]]) 03:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:59, 24 March 2011
![]() | |
archives 1 |
ITN/C
Following Passionless to ITN was really not a good idea. I consider you a friend, which makes this difficult to say, but ITN and Wikipedia are things that I care a lot about, so if you and Passionless can't behave yourselves in each others' company yet insist on inflicting it on each other, one or both of you is going to end up on the wrong side of a lengthy block. Please don't make me do that. You archived your talk page while I was writing this, so by all means feel free to archive/remove this with the rest of it. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:26, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- What a day! You are the third admin, who threatened me with a block in the last few hours :-).
- May I please ask you what gave you an idea I followed user:passionless anywhere? I assure you I am not interested in user:passionless's contributions at all, except of course when user:passionless nominates on deletion the article I just wrote, or trying to make me blocked for nothing or hounding my contributions over not just one, but a few differnt pages or... I could have continued, but just to make it short my concern about user:passionless contributions is connected only, and only and only to the user's contributions about me personally or my own contributions, and nothing else.
- I've already explained today how I got to the ITN page, but I will repeat it one more time here at my talk page:
- I was going to nominate the discussed article for DYK. A few days ago I commented on a DYK nomination for an article of a similar subject. One of the reasons user:gatoclass used in his "maybe" vote was that the article was nominated for ITN. So before making DYK nomination for this new article I decided to make sure this article is not nominated for ITN, and it was how I got to ITN page.
- HJ, if now after I explained to you what happened, you believe my conduct deserves a block I will accept your decision with no complains because I trust you to be a fair administrator, and honestly because I am tired of being the subject of "If in doubt, blame Mbz1", and of course I assure you I would not complain if you are to block user:Passionless :-)
- On the other hand , if you'd really like to help to solve the situation between user:passionless and me, it could be solved with an interaction ban established between the two of us as it was proposed by user:AGK already. I am for this with both my hands. Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 03:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Forgot to say that user:passionless is going to take me to AE. May I please ask you one more time to consider an interaction ban? I believe everybody and most of all the community would only benefit from this. I believe sooner or later it will be imposed anyway, so it is better to do it rather sooner than later.--Mbz1 (talk) 03:42, 24 March 2011 (UTC)