SarekOfVulcan (talk | contribs) →Edit war on Catalan people: agreed. Watch it. |
→Edit war on Catalan people: correction: <s>WP:3RR</s>WP:EW |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
== Edit war on [[Catalan people]] == |
== Edit war on [[Catalan people]] == |
||
You appear to be in violation of [[WP:3RR]] there as what you've reverted does not fit the definition of [[WP:Vandalism]]. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 20:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC) |
You appear to be in violation of <s>[[WP:3RR]]</s> [[WP:EW]] there as what you've reverted does not fit the definition of [[WP:Vandalism]]. [[User:Toddst1|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1|talk]])</small> 20:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC) |
||
I would like you to explain here and now where did I use the words "vandal" or "vandalism" in the Revision history since you blocked me (last time I did was '''21:08, 6 May 2009''' more than a month ago)... Where did I Toddst1? '''You are now lying when accusing me''' here above. I haven't use "''the definition of [[WP:Vandalism]]''" when reverting lately. So, are you making use of your privileges as an administrator to harass me? |
I would like you to explain here and now where did I use the words "vandal" or "vandalism" in the Revision history since you blocked me (last time I did was '''21:08, 6 May 2009''' more than a month ago)... Where did I Toddst1? '''You are now lying when accusing me''' here above. I haven't use "''the definition of [[WP:Vandalism]]''" when reverting lately. So, are you making use of your privileges as an administrator to harass me? |
Revision as of 20:35, 16 June 2009
DOCE, DISCE, AUT DISCEDE... | |
---|---|
Maurice27 | Sandbox | Articles | Wikipedians Quotes | Movie Quotes | Talk | #27 |
---|
“Inflamed by greed, incensed by hate, confused by delusion, overcome by them, obsessed by mind, a man chooses for his own affliction, for others' affliction, for the affliction of both and experiences pain and grief” --Buddha-- | |
---|---|
Archives |
---|
Edit war on Catalan people
You appear to be in violation of WP:3RR WP:EW there as what you've reverted does not fit the definition of WP:Vandalism. Toddst1 (talk) 20:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
I would like you to explain here and now where did I use the words "vandal" or "vandalism" in the Revision history since you blocked me (last time I did was 21:08, 6 May 2009 more than a month ago)... Where did I Toddst1? You are now lying when accusing me here above. I haven't use "the definition of WP:Vandalism" when reverting lately. So, are you making use of your privileges as an administrator to harass me?
Due to past blocks on you part to me and your lack of iniciative at protecting not only me, but all other users participating at that article, I will consider your above message ad hominem threats and harassment personally directed against me.
If you accuse me again of violatiing WP:3RR you are pushing too hard! You know the anon keeps vandalising the article even if a consensus was reached. On your part you are not doing anything to prevent it. The anon has edited many more times than me and another bunch of users is also reverting the vandal anon. Why am I the only warned by you? Is this a personal fixation against me? Watch yourself Toddst1... I'm thinking about opening at Wikipedia:RFC/ADMIN an Appeal to the Arbitration Committee against you. Are you going to block me again for asking them for help? Or will you prevent the article to be vandalize? Probably your only interested in getting another banstar to your collection instead than making your job as admin? You are so conceited. If you protected the article we would not need to revert the anon. I do not salute you. --MauritiusXXVII (Aut Disce, Aut Doce, Aut Discede!). 06:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- I have to say that the edits by the IP, like this one, are naked POV pushing. And that, at first sight, they appear to go against the consensus reached at Talk:Catalan_people#Let.27s_find_the_final_version. And that it's a reincident POV pusher that the IP is called "vandal" by three different established users in the talk page (counting Maurice himself). I would suggest semi-protecting the article and the IP, and not taking Maurice's reverts as vandalism fighting.
- And, Maurice, chill out, please. You are just going to get yourself blocked for incivility. --Enric Naval (talk) 06:48, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- Enric, I thank you for your support. But this administrator is personally attacking and threatening me for who knows which reasons. I will not tolerate it! BTW, He has also ignored Coentor when he asked him to protect the article. So don't lose your time suggesting him "semi-protecting the article and the IP". He won't! --MauritiusXXVII (Aut Disce, Aut Doce, Aut Discede!). 07:08, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, you've been using the abbreviation "RV" many times - as recent as yesterday - to undo revisions to the aforementioned article. See here. This abbreviation is standard here for "revert vandalism". Also, your reaction here is a bit of a strawman argument; it really doesn't matter if you call it vandalism or not - 3RR is 3RR. Stop edit warring and be a bit more civil, or you will be blocked. Tan | 39 15:36, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed with Tan - I was very close to blocking you for a month for that "collecting barnstars" comment, but since you were given a 3RR warning when you hadn't come close to violating it, I'm holding off. Civility, please. (Oh, and Tan -- I use "rv" for revert, and "rvv" for revert vandalism. It's possible Maurice uses the same covention.)--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:40, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
ANI
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Ani. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 15:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC)