Content deleted Content added
Reply |
Reply |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Are you really just going to ignore any sort of fiction related guideline by using "it's notable"? First it was with the episodes and now it is with this. This is a one movie character that asserts no notability outside of the film. You should prove it before asserting it. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 02:05, 4 June 2007 (UTC) |
Are you really just going to ignore any sort of fiction related guideline by using "it's notable"? First it was with the episodes and now it is with this. This is a one movie character that asserts no notability outside of the film. You should prove it before asserting it. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 02:05, 4 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
:Characters require sources to assert notability (actually all things require them per [[WP:V]]), and to give them out of universe information. How exactly do you dispute this? You are the one out to prove a point by reverting anything and everything just because you don't agree with the guidelines. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 02:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC) |
:Characters require sources to assert notability (actually all things require them per [[WP:V]]), and to give them out of universe information. How exactly do you dispute this? You are the one out to prove a point by reverting anything and everything just because you don't agree with the guidelines. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 02:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC) |
||
::Who really cares if people don't agree with what I do? Anyone that does disagree is a major inclusionist like yourself or a fan. Frankly, their opinions do not matter. If you're speaking from a consensus point of view, again, consensus is built by discussion, not numbers. And that point of view certainly doesn't reflect certain [[WP:V|policies]] or [[WP:RS|guidelines]]. [[User:TTN|TTN]] 02:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:19, 4 June 2007
Please leave a message after the beep: BEEP
- User talk:Matthew/Archive/Archive 1 - My archive from December 2005 - June 2007.
Pardon me,
Matthew but for me you're a master of non-consensus edits. I agree with opinion of Q Original. Really sorry.LexingtonDark 03:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm just enforcing our non-free content policy and trying to improve the encyclopaedia. I'm sorry you think I'm making non-consensual edits. Matthew 09:51, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
How long are you going to keep this up?
Are you really just going to ignore any sort of fiction related guideline by using "it's notable"? First it was with the episodes and now it is with this. This is a one movie character that asserts no notability outside of the film. You should prove it before asserting it. TTN 02:05, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Characters require sources to assert notability (actually all things require them per WP:V), and to give them out of universe information. How exactly do you dispute this? You are the one out to prove a point by reverting anything and everything just because you don't agree with the guidelines. TTN 02:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Who really cares if people don't agree with what I do? Anyone that does disagree is a major inclusionist like yourself or a fan. Frankly, their opinions do not matter. If you're speaking from a consensus point of view, again, consensus is built by discussion, not numbers. And that point of view certainly doesn't reflect certain policies or guidelines. TTN 02:19, 4 June 2007 (UTC)