mNo edit summary |
Anthony Bradbury (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
Just pushing my luck. Thought that it was a fairly decent bluff on the img that is still there. Will leave Matt King article as is. Cheers mate. [[User:Londo06|Londo06]] 14:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC) |
Just pushing my luck. Thought that it was a fairly decent bluff on the img that is still there. Will leave Matt King article as is. Cheers mate. [[User:Londo06|Londo06]] 14:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC) |
||
== [[Auschwitz concentration camp]] == |
|||
Hi there; it was agreed some months ago, after extensive discussion at the village pump, that certain articles which regularly attracted high levels of offensive vandalism should be permanently semi-protected. This article was one such. I have accordingly re-applies a semi-protection to it.--[[User:Anthony.bradbury|Anthony.bradbury]] 22:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:15, 29 May 2007
Archives
- User_talk:MarkGallagher/Archive1 — July–September 2005
- User_talk:MarkGallagher/Archive2 — October–December 2005
- User_talk:MarkGallagher/Archive3 — January 2006
- User_talk:MarkGallagher/Archive4 — February 2006
- User_talk:MarkGallagher/Archive5 — March 2006
- User_talk:MarkGallagher/Archive6 — April 2006
- User_talk:MarkGallagher/Archive7 — May 2006
- User_talk:MarkGallagher/Archive8 — June 2006
- User_talk:MarkGallagher/Archive9 — July 2006
- User_talk:MarkGallagher/Archive10 — August 2006
- User_talk:MarkGallagher/Archive11 — September 2006–March 2007 (wikibreak edition!)
- User_talk:MarkGallagher/Archive12 — April 2007
Guess I've got more of a taste for tastelessness in satire than you. :-) --Stormie 03:57, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with my article!
Hi, how are you? I just wanted to say thanks for your help with my article about wheelchair soccer. It's the first article I've contributed! It's all written from my own experience as a player. Is that okay? I mean apart from linking to the Victorian Soccer Federation, there's no real way to verify what I have written. I know it's true, because I was there, but that's about it. What should I do?
Also, is there a way of saying that the rules and gameplay I discuss in the article are specific only to Victoria and the league in which I play. I have no knowledge of whether wheelchair soccer is played elsewhere. Does that make sense?
Thanks.MJ Digs 02:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Hello. I added a speedy delete tag to the article. I did this before I noticed you had removed a previous tag. I really do think this article does not comply with CSD criterion A7, and since Jsc83 apparently agrees, I didn't remove the tag myself. I won't mind at all if you do remove the tag (please do so if you disagree at all), but I will take nominate at AFD. Thanks, nadav (talk) 10:03, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:CLavin.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:CLavin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 21:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:JailBait-DVDCover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:JailBait-DVDCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:49, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Just pushing my luck. Thought that it was a fairly decent bluff on the img that is still there. Will leave Matt King article as is. Cheers mate. Londo06 14:34, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi there; it was agreed some months ago, after extensive discussion at the village pump, that certain articles which regularly attracted high levels of offensive vandalism should be permanently semi-protected. This article was one such. I have accordingly re-applies a semi-protection to it.--Anthony.bradbury 22:15, 29 May 2007 (UTC)