ScottyBerg (talk | contribs) |
Marine 69-71 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 195: | Line 195: | ||
==Please revert== |
==Please revert== |
||
Re [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cerejota&diff=prev&oldid=438139665] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Charleenmerced&diff=prev&oldid=438139927][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:XLR8TION&diff=prev&oldid=438140327][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pr4ever&diff=prev&oldid=438140449][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Quazgaa&diff=prev&oldid=438140976][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eljohnson15&diff=prev&oldid=438141047][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mercy11&diff=prev&oldid=438141225] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Puerto_Rico&diff=438138734&oldid=438135804], you appear to be [[WP:CANVASS|canvassing]]. Please revert. [[User:ScottyBerg|ScottyBerg]] ([[User talk:ScottyBerg|talk]]) 01:02, 7 July 2011 (UTC) |
Re [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cerejota&diff=prev&oldid=438139665] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Charleenmerced&diff=prev&oldid=438139927][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:XLR8TION&diff=prev&oldid=438140327][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pr4ever&diff=prev&oldid=438140449][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Quazgaa&diff=prev&oldid=438140976][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eljohnson15&diff=prev&oldid=438141047][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mercy11&diff=prev&oldid=438141225] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Puerto_Rico&diff=438138734&oldid=438135804], you appear to be [[WP:CANVASS|canvassing]]. Please revert. [[User:ScottyBerg|ScottyBerg]] ([[User talk:ScottyBerg|talk]]) 01:02, 7 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
*I will not revert and I am not canvassing. I am not asking anyone to be in favor or against. I am not asking for votes, but for opinions be it in favor to my opinion or not. [[User:Marine 69-71|Tony the Marine]] ([[User talk:Marine 69-71#top|talk]]) 02:04, 7 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:04, 7 July 2011
External audio | |
---|---|
You may listen to Marc Anthony's interpretation of "Preciosa" here | |
and "Lamento Borincano" here |
|
Please use the box below, or manually enter new messages at the end of my page so I can find them easily. I will answer you in your "talk" page. Thanks
The Marine's archived talk |
---|
May 24, 2024.
|
-Virgilio Dávila-
Spanish (original version) |
translation |
---|---|
por más que te pague bien. |
even though he pays you well.. |
|
Notice
|
My opinion
|
Manuel Rivera, Jr.
Hi. Are the first and second references in this article the same? I don't have access to the offline one, but they are boot written by the same author and published on the same newspaper at the same date. Or have you made some confusion? Thanks, --damiens.rf 01:21, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Fixed, The NYT article changed the name of the article from "Chronicle" to "Style". It was of no wonder that the "Chronicle" link could not be found. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:09, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Tony. Given the problems with the OTRS ticket, I've listed this file at PuF. You'll find it here: Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 July 3#File:SS Euripides Rubio jpg.jpg. I'm afraid that regardless of the outcome of the template up for TfD, the image has issues that need to be addressed if it is to be retained. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:24, 3 July 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, Tony. Thanks for your note. I know it was approved based on the letter. You went out of your way to get that permission, and it was done and accepted in all good faith, but I'm afraid that once our attorney reviewed the letter, he said we could not accept it because he did not believe that the letter would be legally sufficient for the Wikimedia Foundation. This all came up around the time of your surgery. I tried to inform you without bugging you, but I can see now that I didn't explain well enough at the time. We won't be able to use that letter from McClintock to retain any images, but have to look at each image to see where it originated. I am sorry; you did everything right. The problem is in the letter itself, not in your approach. (That said, it can be very helpful if you ask for permission in the future to just point people to Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries and ask them to copy & paste it, with the necessary changes. If they'll do that, it'll save a lot of trouble in the long run because it covers every point we need.) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:49, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for the advice. It is well taken. Tony the Marine (talk) 05:08, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
Please revert
Re [1] [2][3][4][5][6][7] and [8], you appear to be canvassing. Please revert. ScottyBerg (talk) 01:02, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
- I will not revert and I am not canvassing. I am not asking anyone to be in favor or against. I am not asking for votes, but for opinions be it in favor to my opinion or not. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:04, 7 July 2011 (UTC)