Malik Shabazz (talk | contribs) →just a note: be my guest |
174.94.43.164 (talk) No edit summary |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
|editbox=no |
|editbox=no |
||
}}__FORCETOC__ |
}}__FORCETOC__ |
||
Trying to figure out why you reversed the change concerning the Irgun being a Jewish terrorist organization. That is exactly what they were, and using weasel words to dance around it is disingenuous, at best. Thanks for making Wikipedia a useless source of biased, nonsense information and whitewashing.[[Special:Contributions/174.94.43.164|174.94.43.164]] ([[User talk:174.94.43.164|talk]]) 17:28, 2 February 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== Hey, i'm new to wikipedia and the function. I hope this message gets to you. == |
== Hey, i'm new to wikipedia and the function. I hope this message gets to you. == |
Revision as of 17:28, 2 February 2012
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Trying to figure out why you reversed the change concerning the Irgun being a Jewish terrorist organization. That is exactly what they were, and using weasel words to dance around it is disingenuous, at best. Thanks for making Wikipedia a useless source of biased, nonsense information and whitewashing.174.94.43.164 (talk) 17:28, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Hey, i'm new to wikipedia and the function. I hope this message gets to you.
I have received a message from you saying "Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ethnic pornography, you may be blocked from editing".
Tell me where i'm vandalizing Wikipedia? I provided the information that i know is 100% accurate. If you have any further evidence i can provide them. Kaesis (talk) 06:30, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
Re: I'll post the links here:
Your question: "What part of the world do you live in?"
Answer: I live in the same world as you.
Your question: To the best of my knowledge, in the English-speaking world the first sentence is true, not the second. Can you show me a video here with an Asian man and a white woman?
Answer: Of course i can. Whatever i said there was true. I only changed it because it said "Asian women are frequently portrayed with white men compare to vice versa" Here are the links, if you do not want to click on them, it's fine. These are not individual videos, these are whole searcg bars containing many videos. I won't have time posting each every one since there is a lot.
http://video.xnxx.com/?k=white+guy+asian+girl http://www.spankwire.com/Profile.aspx?pc=Videos&SexPref=Straight&UserId=908340 http://www.spankwire.com/Profile.aspx?pc=Videos&SexPref=Straight&UserId=1449411 http://pornamwf.com/videos-all.html http://shelovesasiancock.com/home.html http://asian-man.com/asianmannew/main.htm http://www.justwhitegirls.com/ http://www.butteroncream.com/ http://www.pinkcrave.com/ http://bordello4am.com/
Now can you find as many Asian women/White men porn? I think even one of the links I've mentioned above probably have more than all Asian women/White men porn videos. You should know that Asian women in western society considered porn as a taboo industry. That is why there aren't many Asian female porn actress in the West. I think you've learn something new today.
Kaesis (talk) 10:26, 29 January 2012 (UTC) Kaesis
Re Kaesis
Of course i've heard of Asa Akira, and Annie Cruz. But two or maybe five Asian actress isn't anywhere compare to Western actress. That is why I've changed it from "Asian women are frequently pairing with white men" to "Asian women are hardly portrayed in pairing with white men".
I don't know why you still revert it to "Asian women are frequently portrayed in pairing with white men and much more common compared to white women with asian men porn" when clearly it isn't. If you click on one of my link [I wasn't able to post the x video link because it was filter] then you would know it's the opposite. The comparison is like every 100 video of an Asian male with White female video, there is only 1 White male with Asian female. These are real videos and not something written up. Would you rather believe a video than seeing some written up text?
So, how should the text be change if "Asian women are frequently portrayed in pairing with white men and much more common compared to white women with asian men porn" line is considered vandalism or that it is providing the wrong information. Kaesis (talk) 21:26, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 January 2012
- In the news: Zambian wiki-assassins, Foundation über alles, editor engagement and the innovation plateau
- Recent research: Language analyses examine power structure and political slant; Wikipedia compared to commercial databases
- WikiProject report: Digging Up WikiProject Palaeontology
- Featured content: Featured content soaring this week
- Arbitration report: Five open cases, voting on proposed decisions in two cases
- Technology report: Why "Lua" is on everybody's lips, and when to expect MediaWiki 1.19
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- EdwardsBot (talk) 03:38, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Mate, they are not amateur videos. These actress have names
The fact that I "see" 100x time more Asian men with white women pornography than vice versa doesn't make it your statement correct. They maybe be couples just posting their videos online but it's still pornography and it's still about ethnicity. If you are still denying it, i'll continue to revert back to what is correct. I'll even post the pornography links to it at the bottom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaesis (talk • contribs) 07:42, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
deletion proposal for article Jacky Joy
Hello,
I wanted to write you in regards to your deletion proposal for the article Jacky Joy. You cited, as your reasons, that awards for "blue screw review" are not well known awards and also that she does not meet the guidelines for Pornographic Actors on Wikipedia.
1) I agree that Blue Screw Review may not meet criteria for a "well known award", and could delete these in order to rectify that situation.
2) Although she was just nominated for her first AVN award, which still falls short of the Wikipedia criteria of Awards over multiple years, she has received acclaim from smaller awards (such as blue screw and equivalent reviewers/awards). It can be expected that in the next year she will be nominated and win other awards from larger, more well known awards. For the sake of not having to remake another page at that time, due to this one being deleted, could deletion be postponed for ~1 year in order to see if this criteria is satisfied?
3) Another criteria under the WP:PornBio is that they appeared numerous times in notable mainstream media. Although "notable" is subjective, Jacky Joy has been on numerous mainstream radio channels and reality shows (including playboy channel and the reality tv show Jerseylicious). If by supplying this information, her page would meet the WP:PornBio criteria, please let me know and I will do so.
Thank you very much for your time and I look forward to your response. Gxg2446 (talk) 00:21, 1 February 2012 (UTC)Garrett (username gxg2446)
- Hi,
- Please note that it was User:Morbidthoughts, not me, who nominated the article for deletion—although I agree with her/his rationale.
- I recommend you add information about Joy's appearances in mainstream media to the article (with sources) and add a comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jacky Joy when you've done so. That might help save the article.
- Good luck, — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:13, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Malik Zulu Shabazz
Is that you? Hearfourmewesique (talk) 17:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- No. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:34, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Then please accept my apologies for the wrongful assumption. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 17:38, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- No problem. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 17:42, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
just a note
Excellent user page! I'm stealing your disclaimer for my own page ("Note: Everything on this page is for information purposes only. It isn't intended to establish any particular credentials or expertise. The philosophy of Wikipedia is that it is an encyclopedia that anybody can edit"), if that's cool. It's a good formulation of a vague sentiment I share. Sindinero (talk) 11:00, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the kind note. I can honestly say I "borrowed" practically everything on the page from one editor or another, so please be my guest. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 15:44, 2 February 2012 (UTC)