EdwardsBot (talk | contribs) →The Signpost: 11 July 2011: new section |
→Comment: new section |
||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' · [[Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]] · [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] · [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 01:04, 12 July 2011 (UTC)</div> |
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">'''[[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost|Read this Signpost in full]]''' · [[Wikipedia:Signpost/Single|Single-page]] · [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Subscribe|Unsubscribe]] · [[User:EdwardsBot|EdwardsBot]] ([[User talk:EdwardsBot|talk]]) 01:04, 12 July 2011 (UTC)</div> |
||
<!-- EdwardsBot 0156 --> |
<!-- EdwardsBot 0156 --> |
||
== Comment == |
|||
{{User|Malik Shabazz}},<br /> |
|||
Seeing as you are active in a sensitive topic area, and<br /> |
|||
Seeing as you have been a Wikipedia Admin for one year and eighteen months,<br /> |
|||
Please note that I find the following diffs to be unbecoming of any editor on Wikipedia but particularly one in your position: |
|||
#'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=437988309&oldid=437987708 6 July]''', in which you accused your fellow Wikipedia Admins of lacking testicles and/or of being cowards. |
|||
#'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jiujitsuguy&diff=prev&oldid=437170768 1 July]''', in which you used provocative sarcasm in order to taunt another Wikipedia editor. |
|||
#'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Soosim&diff=436009844&oldid=433928880 24 June]''', in which you accused another Wikipedia editor of having been warned countless times about [[WP:CV]] when in fact your warning was the first he ever received. |
|||
#'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_of_Palestine&diff=435156433&oldid=435150971 19 June]''', in which you described a new Wikipedia editor's first and arguably good-faithed edit as vandalism. |
|||
#'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=prev&oldid=434709038 19 June]''', in which you referred to another Wikipedia editor as a jerk. |
|||
#'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Biosketch&diff=prev&oldid=434362298 15 June]''', in which you accused me on my Talk page of writing "mealy-mouthed double-talk," despite being asked to engage in an article's Discussion page and despite my edit being a good-faithed representation of a cited source. |
|||
#'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=B%27Tselem&diff=prev&oldid=434358911 15 June]''', in which you reinserted a source that was shown not to support a claim being made in an article and summarized your reinsertion as "undo whitewash." |
|||
I note also that an article with which you were recently involved was [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=438974635&oldid=438973765 protected] yesterday for a period of one week on account of pointy editing on your part there. |
|||
I earnestly hope that you will reflect on your behavior in these incidents, tone down your rhetoric, be collaborative and not combative, and make more of an attempt to assume good faith toward other Wikipedia contributors.—[[User:Biosketch|Biosketch]] ([[User talk:Biosketch|talk]]) 06:11, 12 July 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:11, 12 July 2011
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Hello
To Mister Shabaz
Stick to the point I'm Fidel Azazi from Lebanon I tried to write a page about a Very promising singer a 14 year old Camelia Crisan i tried to write about her twice but both pages are deleted so please her two singles hits 70,000 views I provided references but please help me write one thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fidelove (talk • contribs) 20:31, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
Affirmative action
Good edit of yours. Sorry, I must have been very sleepy, not even to have noticed what the title of the article was. -- Hoary (talk) 04:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
You just made a malicious edit. That is usually considered vandalism. I assume you were trying to make a point. Although I find it cute, continuing to do so without actually looking at the talk page discussion on it will result in all sorts of boo hooing. You have almost single handedly kicked off an edit war over something stupid (note the edit summaries reverting you) I will continue to revert malicious edits. I can only assume that this is all in good fun and you will refrain from continuing. Go ahead and mention it on talk after you look into it more. Cptnono (talk) 05:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- Explain it at the new ANI thread then. Cptnono (talk) 06:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- Whatever is the argument of someone who knows they are wrong. I am kind of shocked that you would edit war over something so dumb and intentionally disrupt an article. We have not always had the best rapport but then it got better. And now it is poor again. Sucks, dude. Hopefully it is just an off night for you since and admin who has edited in a contentious topic are pretty straightly shouldn't be looking to form vendettas. Talk to you in a couple days on more positive notes I hope. Cptnono (talk) 06:12, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- You will walk. Just like every other game player here does. Shame we cannot discuss in a civil manner anymore (well you might but I won't). You were right: Whatever is the key. I am off to be as disruptive as you now.Cptnono (talk) 06:50, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I did assume that was what it was. Looks like I was wrong to a certain extent. Would you have edit warred with another editor if you did not have spite for them? And if you have not responded to the archive discussion by now then you never will. There was good reason for that one stupid word. You know it even if you won't admit it.Cptnono (talk) 07:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- The things you people find to argue about. FWIW I do think that the presence or absence of a smile is more relevant in the discussion of feminist analyses than is hair colour. However, as it is a drawing, the presence or absence of a smile says a lot more about the artist's intentions than what women participant's view may be.--Peter cohen (talk) 09:53, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 July 2011
- From the editor: Stepping down
- Higher education summit: Wikipedia in Higher Education Summit recap
- In the news: Britannica and Wikipedia compared; Putin award criticized; possible journalistic sockpuppeting
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Albums
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tree shaping case comes to a close
- Technology report: WMF works on its release strategy; secure server problems
Comment
Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs),
Seeing as you are active in a sensitive topic area, and
Seeing as you have been a Wikipedia Admin for one year and eighteen months,
Please note that I find the following diffs to be unbecoming of any editor on Wikipedia but particularly one in your position:
- 6 July, in which you accused your fellow Wikipedia Admins of lacking testicles and/or of being cowards.
- 1 July, in which you used provocative sarcasm in order to taunt another Wikipedia editor.
- 24 June, in which you accused another Wikipedia editor of having been warned countless times about WP:CV when in fact your warning was the first he ever received.
- 19 June, in which you described a new Wikipedia editor's first and arguably good-faithed edit as vandalism.
- 19 June, in which you referred to another Wikipedia editor as a jerk.
- 15 June, in which you accused me on my Talk page of writing "mealy-mouthed double-talk," despite being asked to engage in an article's Discussion page and despite my edit being a good-faithed representation of a cited source.
- 15 June, in which you reinserted a source that was shown not to support a claim being made in an article and summarized your reinsertion as "undo whitewash."
I note also that an article with which you were recently involved was protected yesterday for a period of one week on account of pointy editing on your part there.
I earnestly hope that you will reflect on your behavior in these incidents, tone down your rhetoric, be collaborative and not combative, and make more of an attempt to assume good faith toward other Wikipedia contributors.—Biosketch (talk) 06:11, 12 July 2011 (UTC)