discussing changes to Our Lady of Guadalupe article |
m →Our Lady of Guadalupe: introduced answer to vadalization by katsam |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Good luck with your future edits, [[User:Katsam|Katsam]] 07:02, 22 August 2007 (UTC) |
Good luck with your future edits, [[User:Katsam|Katsam]] 07:02, 22 August 2007 (UTC) |
||
The problem Katsam is that you erased everything, and what you added in no way retained useful info! I agree with eliminating certain phrases, but fundamental information which is well grounded by the main authorities in the field like Cuevas and de la Torre is something you should have respected! |
|||
Please realize I'm an expert in this particular field which you are not! That as a Mexican I have access to sources beyond your reach including full mastery of the basic language which happens to be Spanish and my own! |
|||
I'm repositioning my text with some of your suggested corrections. Please, before using your scissors to cut away large amounts of text, think, and discern wheather you may be destroying material worthy of an ecyclopaedia. You may contact me at luisgosio@msn.com |
Revision as of 16:11, 22 August 2007
A tag has been placed on Luisosio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}}
to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please note that while this information may be appropriate for your userpage, it may not be proper for article space. --Moonriddengirl 20:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
Our Lady of Guadalupe
I've just erased a lot of what you wrote, but I tried to retain the content (the mention of scientific tests to the Codex, the scarcity of paper in colonial Mexico, and the letter Mario Cuevas printed in his history).
The reason I edited your version is because Wikipedia isn't supposed to contain exclamation points or phrases like "you can bet your life it's true!" It's not supposed to read like a persuasive article.
Try reading these tutorials: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Content
It's also not appropriate to put links to your own blogs in Wikipedia articles, or to sign your work.
Good luck with your future edits, Katsam 07:02, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
The problem Katsam is that you erased everything, and what you added in no way retained useful info! I agree with eliminating certain phrases, but fundamental information which is well grounded by the main authorities in the field like Cuevas and de la Torre is something you should have respected!
Please realize I'm an expert in this particular field which you are not! That as a Mexican I have access to sources beyond your reach including full mastery of the basic language which happens to be Spanish and my own!
I'm repositioning my text with some of your suggested corrections. Please, before using your scissors to cut away large amounts of text, think, and discern wheather you may be destroying material worthy of an ecyclopaedia. You may contact me at luisgosio@msn.com