Content deleted Content added
→Sourced text was replaced with unsourced text: new section |
|||
Line 16:
::Yeah, they really covered that (burden, burden of proof, burden of evidence, proveit, bop, onus... ''they got onus!''). How about [[WP:WHOSEBURDEN]], [[WP:WHOSERESPONSIBILITY]], and [[WP:WHOSE]]? [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]] ([[User talk:Ocaasi|talk]]) 01:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
|
Revision as of 11:21, 10 January 2011
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Burden
You seem to have cleaned up here, so maybe these updates are better put elsewhere. But anyway, more in the annals of WP:BURDEN. Ocaasi (talk) 00:04, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- ah, no. I just have the bot archive everything after a while, and I haven't been doing much on project in the last bit (real life intervenes...). I do need to write that essay, though; maybe I'll do that this evening. Unfortnately, Burden of proof and Burden of evidence already exists as redirects - I'll need to look into co-opting one of them for my purposes. --Ludwigs2 01:18, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, they really covered that (burden, burden of proof, burden of evidence, proveit, bop, onus... they got onus!). How about WP:WHOSEBURDEN, WP:WHOSERESPONSIBILITY, and WP:WHOSE? Ocaasi (talk) 01:52, 9 January 2011 (UTC)