LoveforMary (talk | contribs) →Request of lift blockage: new section |
Warning: Copyright violation on Kateri Tekakwitha. (TW) |
||
Line 142: | Line 142: | ||
{{unblock-ip|1=98.148.213.201|2=<nowiki>[[WP:Block#Evasion of blocks|Block evasion]]: see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lloydbaltazar]] - another 6 months</nowiki>|3=Joao}} |
{{unblock-ip|1=98.148.213.201|2=<nowiki>[[WP:Block#Evasion of blocks|Block evasion]]: see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lloydbaltazar]] - another 6 months</nowiki>|3=Joao}} |
||
[[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=|link=]] Your addition to [[:Kateri Tekakwitha]] has been removed, as it appears to have added [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|copyrighted]] material to Wikipedia without [[Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission|permission]] from the copyright holder. For [[Wikipedia:Copyrights|legal reasons]], we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''article content'' such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''. <!-- Template:uw-copyright --> ''The painting of Kateri Tekakwitha which you uploaded and represented as your own work was not yours. The author has removed it from the article. Wikipedia takes copyright issues very seriously. Do not misrepresent copyrighted works again. Thank you.'' [[User:Elizium23|Elizium23]] ([[User talk:Elizium23|talk]]) 05:56, 25 January 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:56, 25 January 2012
|
January 2012
Hello LoveforMary and welcome to Wikipedia. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Elizium23 (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- No, I am with a different group. We recently created Our Lady of Guidance, Our Lady of Rosary La Naval de Manila today and reworded the clumsy wording on Santo Nino de Cebu. We appreciate you correcting the dead link on the Immaculate Conception for Lutheran readers. LoveforMary (talk) 00:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)LoveforMary
- You may want to explain that at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lloydbaltazar. Please read Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Meatpuppetry for an explanation of why we discourage groups of people from operating single-purpose accounts. Elizium23 (talk) 03:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
I am now reading the link to Puppetry which you attached in the last message. I do understand that several people cannot use a single account due to sockpuppet issues mentioned above. LoveforMary (talk) 03:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)LoveforMary
- Ok, Elizium thinks we should provide the benefit of the doubt here & your tone is different now. But if you are to edit pages, please refrain from the LloydBaltazar approach of adding personally touched up images as art, repeated reverts, etc. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 06:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambig pages
Well, you just turned Immaculate Conception (disambiguation) into a mini-article! What can I say.... The problem with Lloydbaltazar type edits was 170% zeal, and a somewhat singular viewpoint. That problem still seems to persist... Please let that be a disambig page like all others, and somehow find a balance in your edits. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 19:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
- Anyway, someone else reverted that. History2007 (talk) 22:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
WP:OR and Afd
Nomination of Immaculate Conception of Saint John the Baptist for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Immaculate Conception of Saint John the Baptist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immaculate Conception of Saint John the Baptist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. History2007 (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Santo Niño de Cebú (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Spanish, Filipino and King Charles III
- Immaculate Conception of Saint John the Baptist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Orthodox and Saint Elizabeth
- Basilica of the National Shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Portuguese
- Immaculate Conception (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Filipino
- Our Lady of Guadalupe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Roses
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Coronation of the Virgin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gothic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Request of lift blockage
Hello, I am kindly requesting an administrator to lift the blockage currently placed on this IP address. There has recent been an abuse from another individual who has caused the wide block due to numerous edits, but that has been change into the group which now uses a separate account under LoveForMary. It is not handled by Baltazar but by Mauricio. Thank you, Mauricio.
LoveforMary (block log • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))
IP address: 98.148.213.201 (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • unblock • checkuser (log))
Blocking admin: Joao (talk • blocks)
Block message:
WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
instead.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=LoveforMary}}
on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:
{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=Joao | 2=<nowiki>[[WP:Block#Evasion of blocks|Block evasion]]: see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lloydbaltazar]] - another 6 months</nowiki> | 3=98.148.213.201 | 4= | 5=~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here
with any specific rationale. If the decline=
parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.
{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=98.148.213.201 | 2=<nowiki>[[WP:Block#Evasion of blocks|Block evasion]]: see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lloydbaltazar]] - another 6 months</nowiki> | 3=Joao | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=98.148.213.201 | 2=<nowiki>[[WP:Block#Evasion of blocks|Block evasion]]: see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lloydbaltazar]] - another 6 months</nowiki> | 3=Joao | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}
Your addition to Kateri Tekakwitha has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. The painting of Kateri Tekakwitha which you uploaded and represented as your own work was not yours. The author has removed it from the article. Wikipedia takes copyright issues very seriously. Do not misrepresent copyrighted works again. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 05:56, 25 January 2012 (UTC)