Adding sockpuppetry block notice per w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Speaktruth29 (using spihelper.js) |
Loveall.human (talk | contribs) Review and reconsider Tag: 2017 wikitext editor |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
== Blocked as a sockpuppet == |
== Blocked as a sockpuppet == |
||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|abusing multiple accounts]] as a sockpuppet of [[User:Speaktruth29]] per the evidence presented at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Speaktruth29]]. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but '''not for ''[[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]]'' reasons''', and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G5|may be reverted or deleted]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. <b>[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]</b> ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]] • [[Special:Log/Callanecc|logs]]) 07:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-sockblock --> |
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]]<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Indefinite_blocks|indefinitely]]''' from editing for [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|abusing multiple accounts]] as a sockpuppet of [[User:Speaktruth29]] per the evidence presented at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Speaktruth29]]. Note that multiple accounts are [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but '''not for ''[[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|illegitimate]]'' reasons''', and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G5|may be reverted or deleted]]. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. <b>[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]</b> ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]] • [[Special:Log/Callanecc|logs]]) 07:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-sockblock --> |
||
'''Bold''' |
|||
{{unblock|reason=As a part-time human rights loving wiki beginner level editor rare user, the marking of minor addition as major was mistakes as a beginner in the past which was apologized for not being aware as evident from the publicly available record and was ensuring that was not done in future (for the minimal edits that I do once in every few weeks or month in holidays). The strongly cited good faith edits being made to the Hindutva extremist profiles 'only' are bunched along together with some other strange user edits (again the edits made by them are to some other Hindutva extremist profiles) are shown as sock-puppet (the term which took a while to understand). With journalists frequently being shot and lynched in streets under extremism, the human-right voices literally are risking their lives and their generations to contribute fairly under apartheid laws. With your technical expertise and experience would request you to review carefully or at least consider the kind of selective edits being highlighted in such complaints as not many have the minimum academic opportunity to voice out. Thanks. [[User:Loveall.human|Loveall.human]] ([[User talk:Loveall.human#top|talk]]) 07:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC)}} |
Revision as of 07:12, 8 December 2020
Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to .
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 18:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
Hello! Loveall.human,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! — Newslinger talk 09:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
|
Oct 2020
Please read wp:brd and wp:ONUS, if you are undone, you are the one who is meant to make a case for why your edits should stand. There were a number of issues with your recent additions, to many to list in an edit summery.Slatersteven (talk) 12:02, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Hi @Slatersteven:, The added massacres and riots are well documented, historic incidents related to the topic. Every single riot that took in Germany during Holocaust gives a lesson to humanity to prevent such in future. I agree that if its overwhelming there can also be a new wiki page for a list for minor incidents from here on. The ones currently added are the significant ones. May I know which one is 'alleged' that justified to removed many well researched sections of massacres and lynch deaths?Loveall.human (talk) 12:16, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Make a case at the article talk page, so others can chip in.Slatersteven (talk) 12:20, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Okay bruv @Slatersteven:. Meanwhile will restore the content so far available (which are well researched). If any specific incident doesn't meet the scholarly verifiable standard feel free to highlight/modify/remove it. Thanks.Loveall.human (talk) 12:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- No, read wp:brd you do not restore, you leave until you get consensus.Slatersteven (talk) 12:30, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- If people keep reverting your additions, then restoring is edit-warring.
- No, read wp:brd you do not restore, you leave until you get consensus.Slatersteven (talk) 12:30, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Okay bruv @Slatersteven:. Meanwhile will restore the content so far available (which are well researched). If any specific incident doesn't meet the scholarly verifiable standard feel free to highlight/modify/remove it. Thanks.Loveall.human (talk) 12:29, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Make a case at the article talk page, so others can chip in.Slatersteven (talk) 12:20, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Try putting the addition on the article talk page, and then explain why you think it should be in the article, and why you think the objections (if you understand what they are) are mistaken. Try to be brief but not cryptic. So when you write something, see if there are redundant words or sentences. Also ask yourself, would someone who has just seen this issue, know what I am talking about.
- Sometimes what seems unimportant to you, seems important to others (or vice versa). They have a different perspective (or different knowledge).-- Toddy1 (talk) 13:23, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you @Toddy1:. Noted. Loveall.human (talk) 13:59, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
- Sometimes what seems unimportant to you, seems important to others (or vice versa). They have a different perspective (or different knowledge).-- Toddy1 (talk) 13:23, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)Bold
Loveall.human (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=As a part-time human rights loving wiki beginner level editor rare user, the marking of minor addition as major was mistakes as a beginner in the past which was apologized for not being aware as evident from the publicly available record and was ensuring that was not done in future (for the minimal edits that I do once in every few weeks or month in holidays). The strongly cited good faith edits being made to the Hindutva extremist profiles 'only' are bunched along together with some other strange user edits (again the edits made by them are to some other Hindutva extremist profiles) are shown as sock-puppet (the term which took a while to understand). With journalists frequently being shot and lynched in streets under extremism, the human-right voices literally are risking their lives and their generations to contribute fairly under apartheid laws. With your technical expertise and experience would request you to review carefully or at least consider the kind of selective edits being highlighted in such complaints as not many have the minimum academic opportunity to voice out. Thanks. [[User:Loveall.human|Loveall.human]] ([[User talk:Loveall.human#top|talk]]) 07:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=As a part-time human rights loving wiki beginner level editor rare user, the marking of minor addition as major was mistakes as a beginner in the past which was apologized for not being aware as evident from the publicly available record and was ensuring that was not done in future (for the minimal edits that I do once in every few weeks or month in holidays). The strongly cited good faith edits being made to the Hindutva extremist profiles 'only' are bunched along together with some other strange user edits (again the edits made by them are to some other Hindutva extremist profiles) are shown as sock-puppet (the term which took a while to understand). With journalists frequently being shot and lynched in streets under extremism, the human-right voices literally are risking their lives and their generations to contribute fairly under apartheid laws. With your technical expertise and experience would request you to review carefully or at least consider the kind of selective edits being highlighted in such complaints as not many have the minimum academic opportunity to voice out. Thanks. [[User:Loveall.human|Loveall.human]] ([[User talk:Loveall.human#top|talk]]) 07:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=As a part-time human rights loving wiki beginner level editor rare user, the marking of minor addition as major was mistakes as a beginner in the past which was apologized for not being aware as evident from the publicly available record and was ensuring that was not done in future (for the minimal edits that I do once in every few weeks or month in holidays). The strongly cited good faith edits being made to the Hindutva extremist profiles 'only' are bunched along together with some other strange user edits (again the edits made by them are to some other Hindutva extremist profiles) are shown as sock-puppet (the term which took a while to understand). With journalists frequently being shot and lynched in streets under extremism, the human-right voices literally are risking their lives and their generations to contribute fairly under apartheid laws. With your technical expertise and experience would request you to review carefully or at least consider the kind of selective edits being highlighted in such complaints as not many have the minimum academic opportunity to voice out. Thanks. [[User:Loveall.human|Loveall.human]] ([[User talk:Loveall.human#top|talk]]) 07:12, 8 December 2020 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}