→Talk:Denali: new section |
Warning: Edit warring on Talk:Denali. (TW) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Point taken about [[WP:TPO]]. Since you're uninvolved in that talk section, do you mind closing it? There's nothing constructive coming from it. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 01:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC) |
Point taken about [[WP:TPO]]. Since you're uninvolved in that talk section, do you mind closing it? There's nothing constructive coming from it. – [[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]] ([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 01:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC) |
||
== September 2015 == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px|left|alt=|link=]] You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Talk:Denali]]. Users are expected to [[Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages|collaborate]] with others, to avoid editing [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptively]], and to [[Wikipedia:Consensus|try to reach a consensus]] rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.<br> |
|||
Please be particularly aware that [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|Wikipedia's policy on edit warring]] states: |
|||
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made'''. |
|||
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.''' |
|||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> '''[[User:Calidum|<span style="font-family: symbol;"><span style="color:#0d254c">Calidum</span></span>]]''' 02:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:22, 1 September 2015
Welcome
Welcome to my talk page. Lootbrewed (talk) 05:13, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
barnstar
![]() |
The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | |
Supporting good sourcing in the face of cynicism by problem editors. BlueSalix (talk) 18:14, 21 August 2015 (UTC) |
Haha, thank you! I don't know you, but based on the reason for the barnstar I can only assume that you are familiar with the difficulty I've had with one particular editor who likes to remind me about my "newbie" status. Well, nice meeting you and thanks again. Lootbrewed (talk) 21:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
- No prob. I tend to give out barnstars like candy, but I do empathize with your specific situation. BlueSalix (talk) 18:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Canvassing
In my opinion you are dead on there. I looked into it, and it's very odd to say the least. Winkelvi even went to the wrong talk page to ask for backup a second time. Beach drifter (talk) 05:46, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks so much. Actually, when I saw what he had done, I wasn't even sure if there was a rule against doing it. All I knew was that it sure seemed inappropriate and unethical. So I did some searching on Google and, voilà, I found WP:CANVASS. Thanks again for validating my thoughts on the matter. And thanks, also, for finding your way to the Fogle discussion... without anyone canvassing you to go there. Haha. Lootbrewed (talk) 05:55, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
Talk:Denali
Point taken about WP:TPO. Since you're uninvolved in that talk section, do you mind closing it? There's nothing constructive coming from it. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
September 2015
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/30px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Talk:Denali. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Calidum 02:22, 1 September 2015 (UTC)