Little Professor (talk | contribs) Undid revision 627535969 by Narutolovehinata5 (talk) |
SandyGeorgia (talk | contribs) Here's how it's done |
||
Line 167: | Line 167: | ||
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:Stefan2|Stefan2]] ([[User talk:Stefan2|talk]]) 20:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC) |
Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the [[wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#F5|criteria for speedy deletion]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> [[User:Stefan2|Stefan2]] ([[User talk:Stefan2|talk]]) 20:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
== [[Súmate]] == |
|||
You have [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=S%C3%BAmate&diff=636677269&oldid=636448877 twice installed a POV tag] on the Súmate article without any justification on talk. There is no "relevant discussion" on the talk page, and unless you supply reliable sources with a viewpoint you claim is missing, it's not possible to know what it is that you believe to be POV. Please supply reliable sources on talk for what viewpoint you believe is missing from the article, or alternately, remove the tag. [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<font color="green">Georgia</font>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 06:11, 5 December 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:11, 5 December 2014
Hi
Hi. :) Thanks for saying hi! RainbowOfLight Talk 02:49, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Picture Added 2009 US Open
- Hello, I went and verified your image to be correct CC-BY, which is legal to use on wikipedia, and good job about getting the best resolution! I will and would appreciate it in the future if you would use the flickr upload bot at Wikimedia Commons, which can be done in Firefox browser. I think you might like this url Creative Commons, and go click on search! I think you would be good to find us some more pictures if you are up to it or not, I appreciate what you have already contributed! GOOD JOB LITTLE PROF!TW-RF (talk) 02:11, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Unblock request
{{unblock|My work IP (194.176.105.40) seems to be blocked even for logged in users. I work at a large organization so its inevitable that there will have been a lot of abuse from this ip. Could I get an exemption for my particular login? I've been a Wikipedian for many years, and not caused trouble (well, not that much anyway)}}
Little Professor (talk) 13:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi
Thanks for your kind words. I guess I expected wikipedia rules to be equal which is what they state when reading through and I have been reading, but reality is clearly different. Neutrality and civility are not appreciated traits clearly. That was a really unpleasent thing to realize, but now I know. Fragma08 (talk) 17:24, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks again. You said something I should have known long time ago and there appears to be clearcut favourism both among editor friends (just look at Mathsci) who completely sidetracked the subject citing "alleged" inappropriateness (?). The favourism has also spilled over into certain administrators. I was very surprised by some of the "explanation" given as for the not applying the rules equally, and the original admin had full knowledge of the violation happening by both parties. But consciously decided to let it slide, to put it mildly, despite it being an experience editor, who should know better. Furthermore a general warning was claimed off to be a warning of ANI when clearly the two are different, and administrator knows that. But at the end of the day there is nothing I can do about. I played by the rules and lost. And the holes in the "defense" are the size of craters. I have learned from this that rules do not apply for all, and it pays to have friends, because then you can break any rule and sabotage any article. This was not my impression of wikipedia. So it all comes back to what you said. You are right and I just should not have relied on honesty, fairness or principles, as none of that is relevant on wikipedia, clearly. Very discouraging and demoralizing indeed. Thanks for your kind words and for well making me realizing the that some battles are lost in advance. Corruption, coverups and deliberate lies, surprisingly enough, do that. I hope you have a nice day/weekend and you are welcome on my talkpage anyday now. You are right, life outside is more important. Regret to have rambled on on your page now! Again thanks. Fragma08 (talk) 09:54, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Nexus One
Hi, the Nexus One was officially announced and the article needed to be update why you rv my edit? zayani (talk) 18:42, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- since the mobile was officially announced, all the previous sources became Obsolete, and only one source (the official announcement) is needed which was included in the edit, my English is not that good, this why i only edit Tech related articles as this the area of my expertise zayani (talk) 18:54, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Beetlebum.ogg
Thank you for uploading File:Beetlebum.ogg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 05:37, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your improvements
Hey, Little Professor, this is ProfessorPaul, and I just wanted to say thank you for your improvements to the article I started List of largest U.S. bank failures. Re-organizing the list onto a Table was an excellent idea; thank you and take care. ProfessorPaul (talk) 17:17, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
Deletion of OttoMatic
Hi Little Professor, if you were trying to send OttoMatic to AfD, something must have gone wrong; it was added to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2010 January 29, but the article was never tagged with the AfD template and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OttoMatic was never created. I removed the malformed entry from the daily log. Glenfarclas (talk) 09:02, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Little Professor. Remy Mumby just had an article written about him in Minneapolis, an interview on CBS TV, mention on Oprah, and just achieved rare status on YouTube. For some reason you arbitrarily chose to cull YouTube "personalities" of his mention. Very well. No complaints. It's a little frustrating to think that one person cares so much and yet knows so little about the impact of the people he's "policing" that he'd leave Ray William Johnson on the list and remove a boy who finally achieved his dream after years of work and a massive body of work. http://blogs.citypages.com/food/2010/05/gross_boy_eats.php —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.61.150.17 (talk) 23:15, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your response. I didn't add Remy to this article - this was someone else who apparently felt more than me AND you that he should be included. Since this was not intended as advertisement for this person as far as I can tell, and was a complete surprise to me, and since others included in this list have "fewer than 10,000 views" it seems as though the requirements to be included in this list are fluid at best. His mention on the news is shown on his own site - foododdities.com, the Oprah mention (not appearance) is on her "kids with talent" site, and numerous other mentions are on blogs around the world, including Andrew Zimmern's, whose importance in the world of food should not be underestimated. Thank you for your cordial response, and I assure you that it's not a huge issue for me that he be included. I also appreciate that someone does moderate these lists, despite my complaint. I won't continue to press the issue. I leave you to your work, and not that hard feelings would cause issue, certainly no hard feelings exist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.61.150.17 (talk) 23:22, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
RE: Your "(→Legal difficulties: replace with actual quote)" edit
The quote I used in the article was from SFGate quoting directly from the Prosecutor's website (which looks like a temporary post, so quoting from the article was better). Here's the quote from the prosecutor's site (misspellings in original): "Assange no longer wanted
Chief prosector Eva Finné has come to the desicion that Julian Assange is not suspected of rape. Considering that, Assange is no longer arrested in his absence.
Eva Finné will make no other comments during Saturday night."
Orphaned non-free image File:Volleyballcanada.png
Thanks for uploading File:Volleyballcanada.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:50, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
ANI
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 06:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, I have given my input at AN/I if you are interested. You may also wish to review the editor's "contributions" in question, as well as their multiple statements indicating they fully intend to blatantly disregard the consensus and opinions of other far more experienced editors and admins (in addition to Wikipedia Policies and Guidelines). It was at that point (and well over a dozen explanations and polite reminders and warnings) that I thought it warranted to no longer assume good faith. Best, ROBERTMFROMLI TALK/CNTRB 13:39, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of List of catgirls
I removed the prod tag you placed on List of catgirls as the article was discussed at AfD in 2009 and is therefore permanently ineligible for prod. I have no opinion one way or the other on deletion; I am just trying to ensure proper process is followed. You are, of course, welcome to open another AfD. —KuyaBriBriTalk 14:45, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks
It was my mistake, thank you for reminding me Professor, Best. Sean (Ask Me?) 17:31, 25 September 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:VisaDebitUK.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:VisaDebitUK.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 03:34, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Luka Magnotta AFD4
Hi, your input is requested at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luka Magnotta (4th nomination), per your previous comments at the third AFD. Regards, -Stevertigo (t | c) 03:48, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
"Advertising" on No Love Deep Web's page
Oh!!! Nevermind then :)! It's nice to see someone like you on wikipedia, then. My prior experience with power-hungry editors led me to the worst conclusion first. Thanks for clearing that up, hope you have a good day! 142.151.129.100 (talk) 19:13, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Article Feedback deployment
Hey Little Professor; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:55, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
File:NewCBBlogo.png missing description details
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:21, 14 April 2013 (UTC)May 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Padmanabhaswamy Temple may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:33, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Your note on my edit war at Beyonce
If you look more carefully at the history, I *was* using the Talk page very consciously for some time. But Jennie wasn't and hadn't been, so out of frustration and just followed what she was doing. Now I know I can just report her if she does it again. And thank you very much for catching on to her ownership issues with the article;)--Aichik (talk) 18:26, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of landslide victories may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Photographer (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Lunchbox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epistolary (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Serhiy Taruta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oligarch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Trapped.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Trapped.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:44, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:AMD Vision.png
Thanks for uploading File:AMD Vision.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
You have twice installed a POV tag on the Súmate article without any justification on talk. There is no "relevant discussion" on the talk page, and unless you supply reliable sources with a viewpoint you claim is missing, it's not possible to know what it is that you believe to be POV. Please supply reliable sources on talk for what viewpoint you believe is missing from the article, or alternately, remove the tag. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 06:11, 5 December 2014 (UTC)