Lembit Staan (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Human_spaceflight&diff=prev&oldid=701630345 responded]. [[User:Staszek Lem|Staszek Lem]] ([[User talk:Staszek Lem#top|talk]]) 17:36, 25 January 2016 (UTC) |
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Human_spaceflight&diff=prev&oldid=701630345 responded]. [[User:Staszek Lem|Staszek Lem]] ([[User talk:Staszek Lem#top|talk]]) 17:36, 25 January 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Please comment on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorcycling/Conventions#rfc_4440D35|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorcycling/Conventions]] == |
|||
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorcycling/Conventions#rfc_4440D35|this request for comment on '''Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Motorcycling/Conventions''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 40053 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:26, 2 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Please comment on [[Talk:Planet Nine#rfc_18375E4|Talk:Planet Nine]] == |
|||
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Planet Nine#rfc_18375E4|this request for comment on '''Talk:Planet Nine''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 40516 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for February 10== |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Donald Tusk]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Third Republic]] ([http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Donald_Tusk check to confirm] | [http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Donald_Tusk fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 12:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
==[[Google Street View in Africa]]== |
==[[Google Street View in Africa]]== |
||
Line 60: | Line 47: | ||
:::: ::{{ping|BIL}} Not not everything on internet is software output. Anyway, if you want to waste your time and make a catalog of Google Street View, I will no longer object, as long as you will provide a valid reference for each and every item. How long will it take for you? [[User:Staszek Lem|Staszek Lem]] ([[User talk:Staszek Lem#top|talk]]) 22:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC) |
:::: ::{{ping|BIL}} Not not everything on internet is software output. Anyway, if you want to waste your time and make a catalog of Google Street View, I will no longer object, as long as you will provide a valid reference for each and every item. How long will it take for you? [[User:Staszek Lem|Staszek Lem]] ([[User talk:Staszek Lem#top|talk]]) 22:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC) |
||
:::::::At least for the list of included areas in Streetview, it must be accepted that it is referenced by Streetview itself. The list of introductions by date is more doubtful as Streetview itself does not include this info directly. So for the latter list I won't really try to revert any deletions.--[[User:BIL|BIL]] ([[User talk:BIL|talk]]) 22:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC) |
:::::::At least for the list of included areas in Streetview, it must be accepted that it is referenced by Streetview itself. The list of introductions by date is more doubtful as Streetview itself does not include this info directly. So for the latter list I won't really try to revert any deletions.--[[User:BIL|BIL]] ([[User talk:BIL|talk]]) 22:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Please comment on [[Wikipedia talk:Prices#rfc_E28C1B5|Wikipedia talk:Prices]] == |
|||
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Wikipedia talk:Prices#rfc_E28C1B5|this request for comment on '''Wikipedia talk:Prices''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 40909 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Beast fable == |
== Beast fable == |
||
[[Panchatantra]] is mentioned prominently in [[Beast fable]] -- in fact, it constitutes one of this article's few referenced statements. And [[Beast fable]] occurs in {{tl|Panchatantra}}. Isn't this sufficient justification for the template to appear in the article? [[User:Phil wink|Phil wink]] ([[User talk:Phil wink|talk]]) 23:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC) |
[[Panchatantra]] is mentioned prominently in [[Beast fable]] -- in fact, it constitutes one of this article's few referenced statements. And [[Beast fable]] occurs in {{tl|Panchatantra}}. Isn't this sufficient justification for the template to appear in the article? [[User:Phil wink|Phil wink]] ([[User talk:Phil wink|talk]]) 23:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC) |
||
:{{ping|Phil wink}} Navboxes are used to navigate across articles which constitute immediate coverage of the topic in question. "beast fable" is a generic term. We don't include "panchatantra" template into [[India]] article, do we? [[Panchatantra]] is mentioned prominently in [[Beast fable]] simply because this article is severely underdeveloped. Likewise we don't include {{tl|Aesop}} and others into "[[beast fable]]", because this would be upside-down hierarchy. The "immediate coverage" criterion is |
:{{ping|Phil wink}} Navboxes are used to navigate across articles which constitute immediate coverage of the topic in question. "beast fable" is a generic term. We don't include "panchatantra" template into [[India]] article, do we? [[Panchatantra]] is mentioned prominently in [[Beast fable]] simply because this article is severely underdeveloped. Likewise we don't include {{tl|Aesop}} and others into "[[beast fable]]", because this would be upside-down hierarchy. The "immediate coverage" criterion is crucial, otherwise we will have some articles mightily littered by marginally relevant templates. 00:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Please comment on [[Talk:Star Alliance#rfc_F8492A9|Talk:Star Alliance]] == |
|||
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Star Alliance#rfc_F8492A9|this request for comment on '''Talk:Star Alliance''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 41360 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:24, 26 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== best AfD nom ever... == |
== best AfD nom ever... == |
||
for [[Sanathdeva Murutenge]]. :-) -- [[User:Mscuthbert|Michael Scott Cuthbert]] <small>[[User_talk:Mscuthbert|(talk)]]</small> 07:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC) |
for [[Sanathdeva Murutenge]]. :-) -- [[User:Mscuthbert|Michael Scott Cuthbert]] <small>[[User_talk:Mscuthbert|(talk)]]</small> 07:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Please comment on [[Talk:Avoiding dangerous climate change#rfc_611A294|Talk:Avoiding dangerous climate change]] == |
|||
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Avoiding dangerous climate change#rfc_611A294|this request for comment on '''Talk:Avoiding dangerous climate change''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 41781 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:26, 5 March 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Primary sources guidelines == |
== Primary sources guidelines == |
||
Line 90: | Line 65: | ||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Asterixf2|Asterixf2]]. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from [[:Entropic force]]. However, [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not censored|Wikipedia is not censored]] to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to [[Wikipedia:Options to not see an image|configure]] Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on [[User talk:Asterixf2|my talk page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-notcensored1 -->--[[User:Asterixf2|Asterixf2]] ([[User talk:Asterixf2|talk]]) 15:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC) |
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I'm [[User:Asterixf2|Asterixf2]]. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from [[:Entropic force]]. However, [[Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not censored|Wikipedia is not censored]] to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to [[Wikipedia:Options to not see an image|configure]] Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on [[User talk:Asterixf2|my talk page]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-notcensored1 -->--[[User:Asterixf2|Asterixf2]] ([[User talk:Asterixf2|talk]]) 15:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
::{{ping|Asterixf2}} I did not "censor" anything. Please don't use warning templates the purpose of which you probably don't understand. Please write in ''your own'' words what you have in mind. [[User:Staszek Lem|Staszek Lem]] ([[User talk:Staszek Lem#top|talk]]) 19:33, 10 March 2016 (UTC) |
::{{ping|Asterixf2}} I did not "censor" anything. Please don't use warning templates the purpose of which you probably don't understand. Please write in ''your own'' words what you have in mind. [[User:Staszek Lem|Staszek Lem]] ([[User talk:Staszek Lem#top|talk]]) 19:33, 10 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Please comment on [[Template talk:PBB#rfc_5BCAA81|Template talk:PBB]] == |
|||
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Template talk:PBB#rfc_5BCAA81|this request for comment on '''Template talk:PBB''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 42189 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:26, 13 March 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Please comment on [[Talk:Stack Overflow#rfc_D983A9F|Talk:Stack Overflow]] == |
|||
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Stack Overflow#rfc_D983A9F|this request for comment on '''Talk:Stack Overflow''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 42598 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:25, 21 March 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Please comment on [[Talk:Schulze method#rfc_F3C32F5|Talk:Schulze method]] == |
|||
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Schulze method#rfc_F3C32F5|this request for comment on '''Talk:Schulze method''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 43069 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:26, 29 March 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution == |
|||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Staszek Lem|your contributions]] to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into [[:Tardiness (vice)]]. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, [[WP:Copyrights|Wikipedia's licensing]] does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at [[Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia]]. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying--> — [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 23:43, 31 March 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Please comment on [[Talk:Gödel's incompleteness theorems#rfc_859162F|Talk:Gödel's incompleteness theorems]] == |
|||
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Gödel's incompleteness theorems#rfc_859162F|this request for comment on '''Talk:Gödel's incompleteness theorems''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 43522 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:26, 6 April 2016 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for April 9== |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Stitch method]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Suture]] ([http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Stitch_method check to confirm] | [http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Stitch_method fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 09:56, 9 April 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Please comment on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy#rfc_C216D21|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy]] == |
|||
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy#rfc_C216D21|this request for comment on '''Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astronomy''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 43999 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:26, 14 April 2016 (UTC) |
|||
==Disambiguation link notification for April 16== |
|||
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited [[Cobham's thesis]], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page [[Computational complexity]] ([http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Cobham%27s_thesis check to confirm] | [http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Cobham%27s_thesis fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the [[User:DPL bot/Dablink notification FAQ|FAQ]]{{*}} Join us at the [[Wikipedia:Disambiguation pages with links|DPL WikiProject]].</small> |
|||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these [[User:DPL bot|opt-out instructions]]. Thanks, [[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 10:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== Please comment on [[Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity#rfc_E03906A|Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity]] == |
|||
The [[WP:Feedback request service|feedback request service]] is asking for participation in [[Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity#rfc_E03906A|this request for comment on '''Talk:Electromagnetic hypersensitivity''']]. <!-- Template:FRS message --> <!-- FRS id 44420 --> [[User:Legobot|Legobot]] ([[User talk:Legobot|talk]]) 04:25, 22 April 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:00, 22 April 2016
1BC-2013 2014 2015 |
- "Everything you read in newspapers is absolutely true, except for that rare story of which you happen to have first-hand knowledge"
Polish Constitutional crisis
Per WP:RM#CM obviously controversial moves should be discussed first and not moved until a WP:CONSENSUS is reached, please respect this policy. HerkusMonte (talk) 08:20, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diplomacy
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | ||
Staszek Lem, with much pleasure, you are awarded this Barnstar for your even-handedness and fairness in trying to resolve peacefully, conflicts on Wikipedia! -- Poeticbent talk 05:10, 10 January 2016 (UTC) |
DYK for Pilot Pirx
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Human spaceflight
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Human spaceflight. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
- responded. Staszek Lem (talk) 17:36, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
I'm unsure what your objectives are regarding the removal of the information indicating what coverage certain countries and territories have. Clearing unreferenced information is good, but I think you have gone a little overboard. Maybe doing some research and adding references before doing something hasty would have been better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hesky10 (talk • contribs) 23:40, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
I have also noticed you have removed large chunks from the google street view in Asia and Europe pages. I must protest at these changes and say they are not beneficial to users, you now have to navigate so much text to find the information you want, which you didn't need to do before as the page was split by country who had coverage of varying amounts and you could skip to a certain country/territory.
I hope I'm not the only person who preferred the previous layout which was here, and in the Asia and Europe pages respectively, and hopefully I have given enough reason for you to change them back to how they were previously. Hesky10 (talk) 23:49, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Hesky10: I am disinclined to acquiesce your request (means "No!"). Wikipedia has certain policies which were militantly ignored by "Google Earth" sockpuppets. They were given quite some time to clean their act. Staszek Lem (talk) 03:31, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the answer, I'm sure I will get used to the layout changes in time! Hesky10 (talk) 18:46, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- You have removed the entire list of places covered by Google Street View in Europe and Google Street View in Asia. But the list of covered places had references. On https://www.google.com/maps you can see that listed places are covered or not. This reference was maybe not properly formatted, but that should have been fixed.--BIL (talk) 19:11, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- @BIL: A software output is not a valid reference. It is called original research Staszek Lem (talk) 18:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- The output of Google Streetview is not original research. The output of Google Streetview counts as source for what the content of Google Streetview is. Please describe where in WP:NOR this is described. All of the internet is software output.--BIL (talk) 21:01, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- ::@BIL: Not not everything on internet is software output. Anyway, if you want to waste your time and make a catalog of Google Street View, I will no longer object, as long as you will provide a valid reference for each and every item. How long will it take for you? Staszek Lem (talk) 22:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- At least for the list of included areas in Streetview, it must be accepted that it is referenced by Streetview itself. The list of introductions by date is more doubtful as Streetview itself does not include this info directly. So for the latter list I won't really try to revert any deletions.--BIL (talk) 22:29, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- ::@BIL: Not not everything on internet is software output. Anyway, if you want to waste your time and make a catalog of Google Street View, I will no longer object, as long as you will provide a valid reference for each and every item. How long will it take for you? Staszek Lem (talk) 22:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- The output of Google Streetview is not original research. The output of Google Streetview counts as source for what the content of Google Streetview is. Please describe where in WP:NOR this is described. All of the internet is software output.--BIL (talk) 21:01, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- @BIL: A software output is not a valid reference. It is called original research Staszek Lem (talk) 18:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Beast fable
Panchatantra is mentioned prominently in Beast fable -- in fact, it constitutes one of this article's few referenced statements. And Beast fable occurs in {{Panchatantra}}. Isn't this sufficient justification for the template to appear in the article? Phil wink (talk) 23:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Phil wink: Navboxes are used to navigate across articles which constitute immediate coverage of the topic in question. "beast fable" is a generic term. We don't include "panchatantra" template into India article, do we? Panchatantra is mentioned prominently in Beast fable simply because this article is severely underdeveloped. Likewise we don't include {{Aesop}} and others into "beast fable", because this would be upside-down hierarchy. The "immediate coverage" criterion is crucial, otherwise we will have some articles mightily littered by marginally relevant templates. 00:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
best AfD nom ever...
for Sanathdeva Murutenge. :-) -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 07:36, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
Primary sources guidelines
Here is the direct link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and_using_primary_and_secondary_sources#.22Secondary.22_is_not_another_way_to_spell_.22good.22 Articles in journals are often not free to read full text. Don't delete such self-published sources. thx. I have purposefully found primary sources that are free with full text. --Asterixf2 (talk) 08:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- This looks like a direct link to wp:FRINGE, if not nonsense. See more at your User talk:Asterixf2 - DVdm (talk) 09:20, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Asterixf2. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Entropic force. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.--Asterixf2 (talk) 15:56, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Asterixf2: I did not "censor" anything. Please don't use warning templates the purpose of which you probably don't understand. Please write in your own words what you have in mind. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:33, 10 March 2016 (UTC)