m Dating comment by Satanoid - "→Re: Operation Blue Star: " |
Legaleagle86 (talk | contribs) →Sikh Extremism: reply to satanoid |
||
Line 233: | Line 233: | ||
The two above individuals Zafarnamah and Beetle CT have had '''edit warnings''' not to mention, where did these Ghost users come from all of a sudden ? [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/68.163.246.246]] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/117.96.173.151]] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/117.96.144.140]] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/117.96.148.119]] ! Its worth pointing now that Singh6 and others want the [[Behzti]] article to be deleted as well now !! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Behzti&diff=prev&oldid=250889802 I think most fair minded people will go along with Flewis, DJ Clayworth, KnowledgeHegemony and LegalEagle. Thanks. [[User:Satanoid|Satanoid]] ([[User talk:Satanoid|talk]]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment was added at 18:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
The two above individuals Zafarnamah and Beetle CT have had '''edit warnings''' not to mention, where did these Ghost users come from all of a sudden ? [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/68.163.246.246]] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/117.96.173.151]] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/117.96.144.140]] [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/117.96.148.119]] ! Its worth pointing now that Singh6 and others want the [[Behzti]] article to be deleted as well now !! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Behzti&diff=prev&oldid=250889802 I think most fair minded people will go along with Flewis, DJ Clayworth, KnowledgeHegemony and LegalEagle. Thanks. [[User:Satanoid|Satanoid]] ([[User talk:Satanoid|talk]]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment was added at 18:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
: Hi first i am not an admin and some canvassing is allowed under wiki guidelines. I will look into the matter of deletion of behzati. [[User:Legaleagle86|LegalEagle]] ([[User talk:Legaleagle86#top|talk]]) 02:31, 15 November 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:31, 15 November 2008
Archives |
---|
1 | 2 | 3 |
Speedy deletion of Kesavananda Bharati v. The State of Kerala/sandbox
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. VivioFateFan (Talk, Sandbox) 13:58, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Mistake, I agree LegalEagle (talk) 14:02, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
?
sir, can u kindly explain WHICH PERSONAL Attacks I made on the page of Moujiya Encounter??? Because i rechecked the page, and there is no perosonal attack by me. Sunnybondsinghjalwehra (talk) 15:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
hi, bolowali encounter
i don't know why bolowali encounter was deleted
can i repost it?? i have got a punjabi newspaper cover showing the 5 sikhs in the field... Isn't that enough.. I think this article is quite notable since its in the same league as the SARAGARHI battle. And u may not believe but ITS THE TRUTH that 5 'terrorists' fought against 10,000+. Its hard to believe, but even Saragarhi battle is hard to believe where 21 fought against 10,000, and killed more than 4,000. But why can't you believe a battle from 5 against 12,000, and all terrorist killed and from army side casualties in hundreds. Do you think i would lie for the sake of an article?? Sunnybondsinghjalwehra (talk) 16:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, in wikipedia the central theme on which the data are presented is that there should be no original research and the refernce should be independantly verified, you can refer to WP:OR for more details. The article on bolowali encounter seems so unreal that a casual reader would be astonished at the high casualty rate of the army (though i dont think that it is impossible), however it does not have any value on what i think, but it is of value what neutral sources states on the incident, i failed to get any refernce of the bolowali encounter by googling except for a certain extremist blog. So try to substantiate by giving credible sources. LegalEagle (talk) 12:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello sir
Sir,
Since last some days, a person with the ip adress 90.192.59.135, is constantly making edits to Khalistan. I have no problems that someone edits a page and makes it better. But he keeps distorting it, and making the page anti-Khalistan, which is against the POV. So i request you to ban him or contact him.
Thanks in advance, Sunny Singh Doad —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunnybondsinghjalwehra (talk • contribs) 17:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- Dear Sunny, I am not an administrator and as a result i dont have power to block an user. So it is best if you can contact some administrator. LegalEagle (talk) 12:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Espionage in Ancient India
Hi, I'm a new to editing Wikipedia and have stumbled across your page. I've noticed that you started "Espionage in Ancient India". I understand that it's deleted now, you don't happen to have another copy of the page at its prime.--Vishnuchakra 23:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
THANKS
THANK YOU EAGLE FOR GIVING ALL THIS INFORMATION ON RESEARCH AND ANALYSIS WING. I ALWAYS WANT TO BE A PART OF THIS ORGNAISATION . I TRIED MY LEVEL BEST TO GET TO KNOW WETHER ANY EXAMS ARE THERE FOR ENTERING INTO THIS COVERT SERVICES ,BUT I WAS'NT ABLE TO FIND IT,BUT YOUR ARTICLES ALWAYS INSPIRED ME AND AFTER MUCH TRIES I WAS ABLE TO MEET A R&AW OFFICIAL .HE/SHE TOLD ME THE WAY TO ENTER INTO THIS ORGNAISATION,BUT NEVER TOLD ME THAT ON WHAT POST ARE THEY,IF WE CAN CONTACT I MIGHT BE BENEFITTED TO KNOW MUCH MORE ABOUT THIS SERVICE. MY EMAIL IS deathboyof2001@yahoo.com
waiting for your reply thanks and regards your wellwisher —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 59.95.169.35 (talk) 10:57, 12 March 2007 (UTC).
Just to let you know why I have reverted your 'Spelling correction' made to what I wrote in the article. I understand your meaning, however in the context of the story 'reputedly' - by repute; according to general belief - is the correct word to use. Note there is some indication the boy was tortured, with hanging only part of the process, as opposed to hanged in the general sense of the word. Had I wished to infer otherwise I would have simply omitted the word from the sentence. Note what I wrote with the referenced article on the 10th December, in the timeline of the battle. Richard Harvey (talk) 16:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hi Richard, thank you for letting me know the reason for revert. LegalEagle (talk) 11:05, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
bolowali encounter
Sir, could u please explain me why u put an notice on the article Bolowali Encounter? COuld u tell me what I can do, to improve it. Sunnybondsinghjalwehra (talk) 14:36, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, the article on Bolowali Encounter does not have any verifiable reference and on googling it one gets only 3 hits out of which two are from wikipedia and the other is an extremist pov blog, thus it seems that the article is based on original research WP:NOR. I would like to suggest that in order to keep the article you have to get verifiable npov sources to substantiate the claims made in the article. LegalEagle (talk) 14:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Kesavananda Bharati v. The State of Kerala/sandbox
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. VivioFateFan (Talk, Sandbox) 13:58, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
- Mistake, I agree LegalEagle (talk) 14:02, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
?
sir, can u kindly explain WHICH PERSONAL Attacks I made on the page of Moujiya Encounter??? Because i rechecked the page, and there is no perosonal attack by me. Sunnybondsinghjalwehra (talk) 15:28, 30 December 2007 (UTC)
hi, bolowali encounter
i don't know why bolowali encounter was deleted
can i repost it?? i have got a punjabi newspaper cover showing the 5 sikhs in the field... Isn't that enough.. I think this article is quite notable since its in the same league as the SARAGARHI battle. And u may not believe but ITS THE TRUTH that 5 'terrorists' fought against 10,000+. Its hard to believe, but even Saragarhi battle is hard to believe where 21 fought against 10,000, and killed more than 4,000. But why can't you believe a battle from 5 against 12,000, and all terrorist killed and from army side casualties in hundreds. Do you think i would lie for the sake of an article?? Sunnybondsinghjalwehra (talk) 16:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, in wikipedia the central theme on which the data are presented is that there should be no original research and the refernce should be independantly verified, you can refer to WP:OR for more details. The article on bolowali encounter seems so unreal that a casual reader would be astonished at the high casualty rate of the army (though i dont think that it is impossible), however it does not have any value on what i think, but it is of value what neutral sources states on the incident, i failed to get any refernce of the bolowali encounter by googling except for a certain extremist blog. So try to substantiate by giving credible sources. LegalEagle (talk) 12:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello sir
Sir,
Since last some days, a person with the ip adress 90.192.59.135, is constantly making edits to Khalistan. I have no problems that someone edits a page and makes it better. But he keeps distorting it, and making the page anti-Khalistan, which is against the POV. So i request you to ban him or contact him.
Thanks in advance, Sunny Singh Doad —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sunnybondsinghjalwehra (talk • contribs) 17:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
- Dear Sunny, I am not an administrator and as a result i dont have power to block an user. So it is best if you can contact some administrator. LegalEagle (talk) 12:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Eddie Kaye Thomas in AP III.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Eddie Kaye Thomas in AP III.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:38, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Chris "Oz" Ostreicher AP II.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Chris "Oz" Ostreicher AP II.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jim Levenstein in AP III.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:Jim Levenstein in AP III.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:47, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
I've nominated this article for deletion, and since you've been involved in it, I figured you may have an opinion. You can chime in here. --UsaSatsui (talk) 17:55, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
hi
Hi Legaleagle,
Is there anyway to stop the vandalism of the Khalistan page, as you may be aware the Khalistan terrorist groups are banned in the UK and Europe, but for some reason this information is always edited out.
By mistake I think I undid a revision you made, my apologies. I would appreciate any help. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.59.130 (talk) 11:45, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
RTI act and copyright
Hi legal,
could you take a look at the RTI act and see what that means for the copyright status of government issued/released material. For example, what is the license for PIB or DRDO released information? Thanks. T/@Sniperz11editssign 22:50, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hi sniper, as per section 9 of RTI
- Without prejudice to the provisions of section 8, a Central Public Information Officer or a State Public Information Officer, as the case may be, may reject a request for information where such a request for providing access would involve an infringement of copyright subsisting in a person other than the State.
- Thus if we construe the section backwards we find that any document provided by government where the copyright is held by govt, will come under public domain license if not provided otherwise, because the RTI petitioner has the right to publish the report at any forum. However this does not mean that the document has no copyright protection, as pictures which feature in websites where the copyright status is protected then even if the same picture comes under RTI, the stricter license would apply. Thus we have to chk the license in case to case basis. LegalEagle (talk) 12:08, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Possibly unfree Image:Sharma rakesh.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sharma rakesh.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 15:25, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
RAW page - classified info release
Hi Legal,
Thanks for rving the edits. Is there any way we can remove those edits from the history? I suspect that its just an editor with a very active imagination, but better not to take that chance. I'll be watching his edits very carefully from now on. Next thing is to get the images also deleted. Could u add a CSD tag on them if possible. I'm seeing if theres any way to take this forward. Could u email me if possible, so that I can give u the details.
Thanks. Sniperz11@CS 11:57, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Ek1.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Ek1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by an adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 14:03, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sant-Jarnail-Singh-Bhindranwale in the golden temple.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Sant-Jarnail-Singh-Bhindranwale in the golden temple.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
hi
hey, found you editing NUJS page and so dropped on to your userpage. Found that you are doing law. Was quiet happy to see that because in the small time that I have been on wikipedia, I didnt find many with the background in law. Also saw the templates you created. Was wondering what the relating to SCICase was for. Anyways, I have been working on a page for Law Commission of India. Thought would drop a message for you if you could help in any way. Looking forward to hearing back from you. Cheers. Tarun2k (talk) 15:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
- sure, the place may not be organised, but it atleast deserves a page on wikipedia for all the work they have done on law reform. Presently and running busy with some work but plan to come up with the full page soon. Hope you would have liked the contents till now. And I would be more than happy if you could contribute your part.
- As for the template, it looks nice but I was wondering if the holding part in the infobox could be changed to accommodate more than one major outlines of the decisions, all in bullet form. At present I dont think it can accommodate more than one distinct outcome of the case. Hope you would look into that too. In any case, its so nice to see that someone has been working on Indian law related segments, which I have found to be a neglected area mostly. Tarun2k (talk) 09:44, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Raw's direct recruitment
Hi Legal Eagle ,
Was a fascinating read going through your article . ANy idea if Raw recruits directly from amongst cicilians . or can a person apply to Raw . do write back if you know . My mail is falshirmjager@yahoo.com
Much Obliged
Your e-mail
Could you enable your e-mail so I can send you an e-mail? Carcharoth (talk) 16:10, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- My email is already enabled, thanks LegalEagle (talk) 01:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Proxy block
Without any knowledge of what IP you are using, I cannot remove the block. I have blocked several ranges of IPs because they belong to hosting companies, and I have not done any new blocks recently. This is obviously a result of whatever method you are connecting to the internet in order to edit Wikipedia. Please edit from a normal Internet connection, or undo what you just recently changed, and you should not have issues.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Also, it appears you have edited again after the e-mail was sent.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:58, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for quick reply, I changed my server setting and used a dummy filter to edit wiki, but this is a temporary measure only. I would try to access wiki in normal way soon, I hope there would be no problem. LegalEagle (talk) 01:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Page moved
For some reason, you have had your user pages at User:Legaleagle when that account had absolutely no edits, yet you continued to edit through this account (Legaleagle86). I have moved the pages back because this should have never happened. If you want this page to be renamed, you will have to request that your username be changed. I have protected these pages from moving until this issue is resolved.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 17:57, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Ah. Good catch. I hadn't noticed that. Legaleagle, I'll leave Ryulong to sort this out, if that's OK with you. Carcharoth (talk) 18:13, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Discussion on Dynamics of Wikipedia growth
Just dropped in to say Hi after meeting you at the discussion. Hope to keep in touch. And surely let me know things about Wikipedia that you know but I don't. Diptanshu.D (talk) 10:02, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Removing Data from R&AW
Its great to see someone is actually following when things are edited in the R&AW page. But when you remove something, please make sure you substitue with the correct information is it is wrong. Internet is free for everyone.. The information i have mentioned there had come in the news paper. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.12.16.156 (talk) 11:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, i do not doubt that the news on honey trap is correct. but the manner, i mean a disjointed line, in which the information was given in the article is not in tune with the rest of the article. so i would suggest to reformat the line and add it in its relevant place. also add citations if possible, happy editing LegalEagle (talk) 13:37, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Response
I suppose it's okay now.....I am sorry for citing no reference; I had read it in a few books but I have managed to unearth a link.... User:Steed Asprey - 171 7:52, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
- Please dont think that internet sites are only proper citation, you may also refer to well known books. LegalEagle (talk) 14:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem
Thanks for your uploads. You've indicated that the following images are being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why they meet Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page an image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --02:23, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
re: category for Indian law firms
Hi, I have created the List of Law Firms in India and am looking forward to creating an article on each one of these in times to come. I remember our discussion once wherein you told me about some Indian legal templates you made. Since I am not that well-versed in wiki style, I was wondering if you could come up with some similar thing which could bind and link all the law firms, something like a category list. Looking forward to hearing back from you on that. Tarun2k (talk) 07:35, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
Image source problem with Image:Armyinbluestar.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Armyinbluestar.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 12:08, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Siachen-inf06-1024.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Siachen-inf06-1024.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 00:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Could you also look at his edits on the scurrilous Gandhi Behind the Mask of Divinity and Soft Target (book) and other such Canadian Khalistani Bete-Noir related topics?Citedfrequently (talk) 07:02, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- Previously I had discussed with roadahead on soft target and as far as i remember the article was quite stable, I havent read gandhi behind mask so i would not be in a position to comment on the book. LegalEagle (talk) 05:58, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
Re: Operation Blue Star
As much as I'm interested in foreign affairs, I really don't know anything about this particular one or the criticism of it. I'd have a lot of reading and catching up to do just to gain a basic understanding on the topic at hand, and so I don't think my "ruling" on the matter would matter much. Are there any admins that deal more with Indian affairs? I usually stick with National Football League matters. Pats1 T/C 14:53, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. Wish you had some opinion on the issue. LegalEagle (talk) 15:00, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Legaleagle, I have noticed that you had a big discussion about one valid topic in Operation Bluestar and you had asked several editors to participate in the discussion. Kindly invite me about any Sikhism related or similar discussion in the future. --Singh6 (talk) 06:26, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Sikh Extremism
Hi LegalEagle, I wandered if you could look at this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Princhest
Its seems apparent that Singh6 is inviting users to have it deleted. This raises serious questions about the singular honest/democratic value of the keep/delete votes, (it seems as Wikipedia could do with some improvement) I also notice many ghost anon IP's have asked it to be deleted, whereas admins like yourself have asked it to be kept; I added some links of the manipulation/intimidation/ not just of journalists and politicians but also to free speech itself as seen in Behzti which by coincidence is also been nominated for deletion by Singh6 and Sikh-'history' ??
The two above individuals Zafarnamah and Beetle CT have had edit warnings not to mention, where did these Ghost users come from all of a sudden ? [[1]] [[2]] [[3]] [[4]] ! Its worth pointing now that Singh6 and others want the Behzti article to be deleted as well now !! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Behzti&diff=prev&oldid=250889802 I think most fair minded people will go along with Flewis, DJ Clayworth, KnowledgeHegemony and LegalEagle. Thanks. Satanoid (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added at 18:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC).
- Hi first i am not an admin and some canvassing is allowed under wiki guidelines. I will look into the matter of deletion of behzati. LegalEagle (talk) 02:31, 15 November 2008 (UTC)