118.175.184.102 (talk) →Re: 203.81.67.254 unblock request: applying First World standards to an ox-cart economy |
find another place to vent |
||
Line 334: | Line 334: | ||
I've been patient with him. I find him full of bad faith. This sing-song of "let's discuss" and then he goes ahead and makes a bold move without sources that OHP is a subfield of i/o psychology. I think he should be barred from Wikipedia for his double-talk.[[User:Iss246|Iss246]] ([[User talk:Iss246|talk]]) 04:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC) |
I've been patient with him. I find him full of bad faith. This sing-song of "let's discuss" and then he goes ahead and makes a bold move without sources that OHP is a subfield of i/o psychology. I think he should be barred from Wikipedia for his double-talk.[[User:Iss246|Iss246]] ([[User talk:Iss246|talk]]) 04:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Re: 203.81.67.254 unblock request == |
|||
Re: "If someone happens to use this IP, they can provide a *real* unblock request." That [[WP:AGF|WAS]] a real unblock request. How can anyone make an unblock request from that IP when the IP talk page access is blocked?[[Special:Contributions/118.175.184.102|118.175.184.102]] ([[User talk:118.175.184.102|talk]]) 13:22, 28 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:{{tps}} The IP talk page access is not blocked. It seems that the anon user who has used an open proxy that connects to various 203.81.67.x IP addresses, and is now using another proxy connecting to 118.175.184.102, has formed this mistaken impression for the following reason. He/she tried to edit an IP talk page via the proxy which had connected to that IP address. However, the proxy had changed which exit IP address it was using, with the result that he/she was trying to edit the talk page of a different IP address than the one he/she was editing from. Since the IP address currently in use was blocked, it failed to edit the talk page ''of a different IP address''. Presumably, the person knows too little about how anonymizing proxies work to realise that was what was happening, and thought that the talk page access was blocked. [[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]] ([[User talk:JamesBWatson|talk]]) 19:23, 30 May 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::No, the talk page is blocked, it cannot be edited. The block seems to have knocked out half the providers in the province. Apparently that's how [[Internet_in_Burma|how proxies work here]]. And I don't exactly "use" a proxy, I pay 500 kyats per hour and try to be discreet. (Note the "severe prision terms" in the linked article, also the requirement that internet cafes provide a video camera and four security guards to monitor usage.) The error message I believe said "open proxy error" and the block was by User:zzuuzz . So far I have wasted about 1000 kyats trying to explain to Wikipedia that the person who added some slang insult to two indie band articles back in May has probably moved on ages ago, and probably only had a 28 day visa to begin with, but if you guys want to block an economically depressed [[Internal conflict in Burma|rebel region]] for 6 months, based on two edits two days apart, go ahead and knock your socks off. I am so done here. [[Special:Contributions/118.175.184.102|118.175.184.102]] ([[User talk:118.175.184.102|talk]]) 03:50, 2 June 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::IP address, I have also explained to you ([[User talk:203.81.67.254|here]]) how these IP addresses are not just available from within Burma, but available for use by anyone in the world - including the vandal who used it before, all the other vandals and banned users we have trouble with, and even me. This is made worse by the fact it's listed on sites used by vandals listing IP addresses to use to evade blocks. However I recognise the type of proxies used in the region, and that you may be suffering from what we term 'collateral damage'. I accept it's a possibility that you may be genuinely affected as a non-open-proxy-using user. I am willing to offer [[WP:IPBE|IP block exemption]] on your registered account, if I can be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that you are genuinely resident in the affected geographical region. My email is available, when you're signed into your account, at [[Special:EmailUser/Zzuuzz]]. -- [[user:zzuuzz|zzuuzz]] <sup>[[user_talk:zzuuzz|(talk)]]</sup> 10:49, 2 June 2013 (UTC) |
|||
::::118.175.184.102 is a proxy, but not an open proxy, so there should be no problem with continuing to edit from that IP address, whether via an account or anonymously. [[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]] ([[User talk:JamesBWatson|talk]]) 13:08, 2 June 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::::Unless the government cuts the power in that part of town or the internet goes down, which it does on a daily basis, in which case the only other providers in the region are on the IP you don't like. You are applying First World standards to a place where they haul things around by ox cart, and you are also coincidentally taking the sides in a political dispute. See [http://www.lonelyplanet.com/myanmar-burma/travel-tips-and-articles/76954] and maybe this one [http://www.businessinsider.com/burma-bans-skype-2011-3], although it's clearly ridiculous since there isn't really any connection fast enough for voice, not even SkyNet, plus if you want to call abroad, you can get a 28-day non-renewable SIM card for around $25. No, you just make the barrier higher, probably impossibly high, for any future participation in WP for, or on behalf of this region.[[Special:Contributions/118.175.184.102|118.175.184.102]] ([[User talk:118.175.184.102|talk]]) 06:34, 4 June 2013 (UTC) |
|||
:::HA HA HA HA |
|||
:::<nowiki>*wipes tears from eyes*</nowiki> |
|||
:::<nowiki>*wipes spit from screen</nowiki> |
|||
:::So you want me to edit under an account in order to edit under an IP? I guess you didn't read the part about the "severe prison terms". Thanks but no thanks, I'm not willing to go to jail, such as it is in these parts, in order to edit Wikipedia, which I'm just guessing they don't have in jail anyhow. I have another idea. If you want to prevent vandalism, why don't you block all the registered users, because you know, registered users can be vandals. Not to mention socks. Block them all, and let Jimbo sort them out. |
|||
:::[[Special:Contributions/118.175.184.102|118.175.184.102]] ([[User talk:118.175.184.102|talk]]) 05:53, 4 June 2013 (UTC) |
|||
== Hydronymy == |
== Hydronymy == |
Revision as of 11:35, 4 June 2013
Kuru's Talk Page | ||
|
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Keep up the great work! Tiggerjay (talk) 22:13, 7 December 2012 (UTC) |
HBC AIV helperbot7 incorrectly removing entries from Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Hi, I noticed you have just blocked someone so am hoping to catch you online. Please could you take a look into this, the bot is continually archiving a block request for User:220.244.57.53 claiming they have been blocked. Last version including the request: [1] Thanks, Halsteadk (talk) 18:00, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- Apparently Halsteadk has a new definition of both "current" and vandalism. The IP has been rightfully removed from the AIV reports (✉→BWilkins←✎) 20:05, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Some Pizza for you
Pizza! | |
Thanks for keeping an eye on John Schnatter's page. I went to warn the guy who vandalized it earlier today, and saw that you had already done it. Good job. Pizzamancer (talk) 11:08, 11 December 2012 (UTC) |
AIV thanks
Thank you very much for the rapid response at AIV. I really felt that that had gone far enough. Cheers DBaK (talk) 12:58, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Koleimports
OK, not a problem. Daniel Case (talk) 04:52, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
LakevilleFD
Not a problem either. Daniel Case (talk) 17:33, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Hello Kuru
Wikipedia page on MBA doesn't make the point the linked blog post was making. Are you for real? Should bloggers go to uni, get phd, publish one research article and then link it to wikipedia to make their point? anyway the blog post was more useful page on web than this one with too many stars (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kuru). If the blogs linked are commercial sites, then your action is reasonable. Which is not the case right now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandeep2k12 (talk • contribs) 12:51, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- We have a fairly explicit policy on reliable sources. In no reading would a low-quality, anonymous, two-week-old blog be considered reliable by our standards. Why would we bother with sourcing at all if anyone could source to their own personal opinion? Kuru (talk) 13:10, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Unblock request for 68.46.61.211
Jc37, could you provide some context for the block at User talk:68.46.61.211. I can't see any deleted edits or edit filter entries, so I assume something was oversighted that lead to a six month block on the IP? Could you share your recollections on what occurred? Kuru (talk) 14:30, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- Not seeing much in the way of constructive edits. Mostly just looks like unexplained removal (or replacement) of chunks of text.
- You may wish to ask what they intend to do once unblocked.
- But regardless, you are welcome to unblock at your discretion. - jc37 23:21, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
- I have unblocked. There are certainly problems with the editing, but not the extreme sort of vandalism that would justify a six month block without any warning whatever. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:04, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
184.146.113.29 attempting to game the system
Thanks for that - it seems that some people don't realise that we don't necessarily play by "the rules" round here with vandals who don't play by the rules either. Cheers Tonywalton Talk 01:57, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
- Si. I can see the logic if it was marginal "confused" type vandalism, but trolling with language that indicates they're familiar with the routine is blockable on sight to me. Kuru (talk) 02:04, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
- Exactly. This was no way "I think I was doing good things" stuff, and the "no prior warnings" attempted unblock was IMV further evidence. As I said, thanks. Tonywalton Talk 02:13, 25 December 2012 (UTC)
You blocked 86.42.8.86; he's evading
Using another IP, 88.151.81.197. See the relevant AN/I thread if needed. Perhaps a rangeblock is in order? Salvidrim! 22:26, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Blocked him; please let me know if he shows up again. I don't have enough data to triangulate a rangeblock yet. Kuru (talk) 22:36, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Kuru, rangeblock doesnt appear to work, he has evaded them in the past. Here is an outline (not complete), of what we are dealing with. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Murry1975/IP.86. I will watchlist your talkpage in case you reply (I would be interested in your opinion), or you can drop a comment on my page. Thanks. Murry1975 (talk) 13:00, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Murry1975/IP.86 doesn't seem to exist? Salvidrim! 13:07, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Here Sorry about the missing period. And second attempt!Murry1975 (talk) 13:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Jeeeeeez. I didn't know the history was that extensive. Thanks for the hard work! Salvidrim! 13:57, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, that does not look promising. I'm traveling right now, but I'll look at it in more detail when I get back. Summary pages like that help tremendously, thanks! Kuru-public (talk) 14:58, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- He does have a good knowledge of football, but his co-operation on the project and his fleeting comments, some of which are unexcusiable, matched with his poor understanding of guidelines isnt helpful. I have not gone through every IP I have noted of his, I will when I get more time, but other editors have help compose the list, which we taught might be helpful at some stage if things kept going in the wrong direction. Murry1975 (talk) 17:41, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, that does not look promising. I'm traveling right now, but I'll look at it in more detail when I get back. Summary pages like that help tremendously, thanks! Kuru-public (talk) 14:58, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Jeeeeeez. I didn't know the history was that extensive. Thanks for the hard work! Salvidrim! 13:57, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Here Sorry about the missing period. And second attempt!Murry1975 (talk) 13:47, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Murry1975/IP.86 doesn't seem to exist? Salvidrim! 13:07, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
- Hi Kuru, rangeblock doesnt appear to work, he has evaded them in the past. Here is an outline (not complete), of what we are dealing with. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Murry1975/IP.86. I will watchlist your talkpage in case you reply (I would be interested in your opinion), or you can drop a comment on my page. Thanks. Murry1975 (talk) 13:00, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Blocked user back yet again
Hello the twice blocked user 86.42.8.86, is not back again and has once again undone the edits done to revert their vandalism. I have provided links to them constantly showing them why what they're doing is wrong, yet this has been ignored. I have written on their talk pageto try and sort this out, but this was ignored. I have noticed that many others members have come up against this person and their various IPs always starting with 86. In fact there is a page dedicated to the vandalism done by the person under several slightly different IPs spanning well over a year. I cannot recall exactly where I saw this I am affraid.
I am contacting you because I was instructed to here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Special:Contributions.2F92.40.254.14.2C_Special:Contributions.2F86.42.8.86:_Edit_warring.3F
Hopefully we can get this issue resolved once and for all. This person shows no interest in contributing and has no respect for the rules or what is best. They have been blocked numerous times and have had several long term members try to stop them only for this person to verbally attack them and continuasly vandalise the same pages over and over again.
I wish I could show you the long page of vandalism done by this person stemming well over a year. Another member said with regards to it that "if it was any of us registered users doing this we would have been banned long ago". This person has been doing this since 2011 and continues to ignore authority and members showing them what they're doing wrong. If this isn't a case for a range block then I don't know what is. I will look the page in question and if I find it I will send it to you.
- it actually was very easy to find via history, huzzah! Here is the link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Murry1975/IP.86.
All the best Pippin0490 (talk • contribs) 22:10, 28 December 2012
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
HAPPY NEW YEAR 2013!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Jeb2003 (talk) 16:05, 31 December 2012 (UTC) |
Re: Cisneros
Yeah, it's strange – that article contradicted itself multiple times. First it said Cisneros was the first, but elsewhere it said that Alfonso J. Cervantes was. I tried to fix the discrepancy by changing all the descriptions of Cisneros from "first" to "second." Delaywaves • talk 16:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 12:51, 7 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Abhidevananda (talk) 12:51, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
Set Unblock Lucasmoura
Please to Unblock User:Lucasmoura. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 177.64.149.42 (talk) 06:21, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Help with disruptive editor
Hello. I saw that you have had a history with Film Fan, and have blocked him twice for edit warring. In the past he has caused disruption at Taare Zameen Par regarding the article's title and lead section. He was met with opposition then and gave up after unanimous opposition in a requested move, but now has returned and appears to be trying to start an edit war. If you've dealt with Film Fan or seen any conversations with him, you'll know that trying to reason with him is pointless. I was wondering what you thought I should do regarding this matter? Can I report him for disruptive editing, especially due to his numerous blocks in such a short period of time for this same matter? Thanks. Ωphois 01:58, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- This seems to be a different discussion than the move request, but it is a continuation of the edit war from September. I've protected the article for a short period to encourage the discussion on the talk page of the article and left a message there. If The same reversion occurs, please let me know, but do not engage in a tit-for-tat revert process with him... Sorry. I know this can be frustrating. Kuru (talk) 02:22, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- The discussion so far has nearly everyone opposing him, but he immediately reverted back to his version after the block ended. Ωphois 20:02, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- I restored to the original version until consensus could be reached, but he again reverted to his version. He's not a new editor who doesn't know better. He knows what he's doing and has been blocked numerous times for such actions. From his recent comments on the discussion, it sounds like he has no intention of stopping even if consensus is against him. I don't want to start an edit war, but after dealing with his disruptions for six months, I don't know what to do. Ωphois 15:36, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
- The discussion so far has nearly everyone opposing him, but he immediately reverted back to his version after the block ended. Ωphois 20:02, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
He's back, straight out of his block, and back into contentious editing, as his history shows. Edit history. He's upsetting the cart over at Ansel Adams and David Gilmour, as well as numerous other pages. Chaheel Riens (talk) 06:43, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
- And again last night on the same page. Is there really nothing that can be done about this disruption? - SchroCat (talk) 05:19, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Backend as a service discussion
Hi again Kuru, Just wanted to touch base with you again about the issue of including company names on the Backend as a service article. I'm also reaching out again today to another editor, User:Ceyockey, who had previously expressed a view similar to yours at WP:Companies. I'd really like to get all of us talking over at Talk:Backend as a service in an effort to find a consensus on how to do this right. Thanks! ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 18:53, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hey Kuru, There's been some additional discussion over at Talk:Backend as a service about how to decide which company names we might include in the article. Would you mind taking a look and seeing if you have any thoughts? Thanks! ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 15:34, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
As you recently edited that article, I would like to run this by you. What do you think is going on with that new user JRussell? Looks to me like a single-purpose account with an ax to grind. ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 16:13, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
- There's a tremendous number of people with axes to grind against the DRT. I'm not sure how most of that is notable in the grand scheme of things, at least in the context of the shrine itself. Maybe some could be offloaded to Daughters of the Republic of Texas, with a summary at this article of "about every three days, there's a honkin' public spat over the administration of the Alamo"? Kuru (talk) 19:19, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, a spinoff article might work, or at the very least might isolate it away from the shrine article, as the average reader probably doesn't care about the behind-the-scenes catfights. I'll see what I can do. Although if that SPA reverts me again, I might ask you for help. :) ←Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? carrots→ 21:29, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Should you change the visibility of revisions edited by Ps75 on the page Dominique Strauss-Kahn as content and edit summary hidden because RD2 (Gross insulting, degrading, and/or offensive material)? Eyesnore 22:08, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
- Aye. Will do. Kuru (talk) 22:12, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
Judson High School editing
I see you undid some edits i made to Judson High School. I went there and am trying to improve the sight. We have more alumni than just atletes. MD's, PhD's, politicians and even a 9/11 victim. How can it be decided who goes there? Is there someone in charge of this page. Thanks.
satbiii@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Satbiii (talk • contribs) 23:59, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
RfA: thank you for your support
Kuru, thank you for your support during my RfA, and then sticking with it despite your misgivings. I hope that I was not a complete disappointment as a candidate. Regards, Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:36, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
- Not at all. RFA is a mess; yesterday's no-big-deal is today's joyous crucifixion. I'm impressed by your professionalism and hope you will stick around, wounds and all. Kuru (talk) 01:32, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not going anywhere, Kuru. My principal goal in editing Wikipedia is to improve certain categories of articles. Beyond that, I believed that I could offer the project a little something extra as administrator (and I still do), but I don't crave or need the job. I was just volunteering to lend a hand where I believe another good volunteer could be used. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 14:47, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Cleo Rocos and 190.46.98.195
Just a quick heads-up that they are back again - and their rather pointed edit summaries still continue. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 04:06, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the earlier block. Unfortunately it seems like he's IP hopping to edit war further. Thanks - SchroCat (talk) 16:18, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I know you have already received a host of these, but thank you for your work on the UTSA page. Your quick reversion of vandalism was much appreciated! Ðrdak (T) 07:54, 17 February 2013 (UTC) |
New to this...
Hi Kuru - thanks for helping me learn how to contribute effectively. I presume the block http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_ERP_software_packages&diff=next&oldid=540602961 is because the product added (iBE.net) is not backed up with its own page and reliable sources. Is this correct ? Richard.minney (talk) 14:13, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
IP86
He is back 86.44.248.184. Your call bud. I wont be on for long today. 15:02, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
Adding a section with reference on Exercise induced nausea
I would like to add some steps to prevent exercise induced nausea which I found on an external link. I have posted this on the talk page. Could you plz have a look? Traintogain (talk) 07:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)
User:Whltran
Hi, Kuru. You recently blocked Whltran (talk · contribs). It seems that s/he continues editing as 220.236.25.97 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). Beagel (talk) 14:07, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Immediately after his block expires, he continues his warring on Red Tour. — Statυs (talk, contribs) 21:47, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
Confused????
Look at the following.
"User talk: 92.18.59.23 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Foreign exchange market, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Kuru (talk) 13:35, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
This is the message I received while I was offline. As you can see I have an account that I work with. I have only made 2 minor edits. This says I have been spamming but I have never even visited the Foreign Exchange Market Page. The edits I made were fixing a mis-spelled name on The Chorus(soundtrack) so the link was fixed and Capitalization of the Turbo generator caption on the page Electricity generation.
Please respond ASAP as to why I received this message. DSM BrAIInZz
Confused????
Look at the following.
"User talk: 92.18.59.23 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Foreign exchange market, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Kuru (talk) 13:35, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
This is the message I received while I was offline. As you can see I have an account that I work with. I have only made 2 minor edits. This says I have been spamming but I have never even visited the Foreign Exchange Market Page. The edits I made were fixing a mis-spelled name on The Chorus(soundtrack) so the link was fixed and Capitalization of the Turbo generator caption on the page Electricity generation.
Please respond ASAP as to why I received this message. DSM BrAIInZz — Preceding unsigned comment added by DSM BrAIInZz (talk • contribs) 13:54, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
- You're receiving the message because you're using an IP address that was previously used by a spammer. It is not targeted to you, and you should not be able to see it when you are logged in. Perfectly safe to ignore. Kuru (talk) 21:30, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello Sir! I just want your intervention at Mukti Bahini. I added 'facts and figures' from neutral, Pakistani, and Bangladeshi sources, but two editors collaborated and reverted my edits. I did clean-ups and fixes in the Artcle too but they were reverted too, but they were reverted too with the reason of "junk". I had started the discussion at talk about the references for figures of killed Biharis, but the two editors combined reverted everything. They say that the references that I have provided them are not accessible to them(And This is not a reason of removing them). Instead of discussion at talk, where I had started discussion, they reverted my edits. An editor requested another on his talk, and then they both collaborated. They also made comments against my approved rollback request here. About the references for Bihari killings, they say that they are not accessible. I am new to Wikipedia relatively, and thus I came to you for Administrator intervention as I don't have any collaborator. I request to you to go through the Article's history and the Talk's history, I did not engage in edit war but they tried their best. Now you are only my hope. I have requested some other Administrators too! Pleae Sir! HELP! Faizan (talk) 14:15, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Some Ramen for you: kicking 108.25.119.171 to the curb
Ramen! | |
Thanks for intervening and handling the above IP's abuses. Thanks. Cheers. --Rangeblock victim (talk) 15:39, 31 March 2013 (UTC) |
List of private security companies
surely a listing on the the private security industry regulatory authority of south africa would allow a security company to be listed under south africa?? you have accepted an ADT listing under south africa with a link to an american companies website... please explain how i go forward i have also included two links referencing stratagem risk international as authorities... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.236.87.201 (talk) 19:01, 4 April 2013 (UTC) http://www.psira.co.za Registration Inquiry S/P Security Service Provider Details
Psira Number : 1921275 Name : STRATAGEM RISK PROTECTION INTERNATIONAL CC Trading As : Registration Status : Registered Registration Date : 2010-04-13 Registration Number : CK2008/228416/23 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 105.236.87.201 (talk) 19:05, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you
Thanks for this. I'm among the long list of edtiors he's harassed over the past 24 hours or so. Here's the updated list of his socks & blocks over the past day (that we know of): 99.104.185.17 (primary account), 200.233.70.48, 64.75.159.129, 196.12.59.12, 202.88.225.150, 46.209.250.1. Have a nice week. --76.189.111.2 (talk) 07:00, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Online Counseling
Hello,
Can you please look into the article online counseling. A user by the name of novaseminary keeps blanking an entire section. Then he keeps giving me 3rr warnings. I have asked to work with him to improve the article to which he does not respond. His edit history is mostly section / part section deletion on pov issues. If Im incorrect, I am willing to correct my actions. I am only looking for another point of view. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.84.241.55 (talk) 01:07, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Removal of archived talk posts
Please allow the removal of the post I removed earlier today. The post is not of critical importance and for matters of personal identity I would prefer this post result to remain hidden from search engines. RTACC (talk) 05:19, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Please see admin Boing's talk page regarding IP 109, who's on yet another proxy server. Thanks. 76.189.111.2 (talk) 19:28, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- Looks like Mr. Kite has blocked already. I did double-check and there are proxies on 80 and 8080. Thanks for the note. Kuru (talk) 20:09, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Joseph Goebbels would be proud of you!
Your threats and menaces are very, very disgusting. I understand now why so many valuable users had abandon editing WP, as people like you would blocked them with non-sense arguments, as in my case (it seems that the moral of my case is: if your page is vandalized, just bear it without making anything, or we will block you, as administrators will also do nothing against the vandal). Dont answer me, as I dont want to talk a single word more with totalitarian people like you. Bye forever.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 15:34, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not sure that I've made any threat and/or "menaces". We're quite adept at dealing with petty vandalism, and supporting good editors in the process. If you're still confused by Amorymeltzer's deletion of your vitriolic threat and Bbb23's block for the same, then I have no doubt you'll repeat the behavior, and we'll certainly be exchanging words again. Kuru (talk) 23:41, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Indian website accepted by Wikipedia
Hi Kuru,
Hope you are well. I just wanted to confirm if the Wikipedia accepts Self drive cars website www.zoomcar.in.
We have a client who offers self drive cars and he wants a pages in Wikipedia, and when the client researched on it most of the Indian car rental services company pages are not listed in Wikipedia. Can you please explain me why?
And if I want to create a page for my client, what are the protocols I need to follow.
Do let me know if you have any suggestions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mfardeen (talk • contribs) 12:20, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi. User:Kuru/Cougarspride has been indefinitely fully protected since December 2007. Could you please unprotect this page? --MZMcBride (talk) 21:11, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
- Yikes, that's ancient. Probably just needs to be deleted. Did you need to edit it, or can I just nuke it? Kuru (talk) 00:56, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
User:Mschwerin
Hi,
I'm currently trying to register a unified login for my german wikipedia user (mschwerin). This fails because there is a conflict with the english wikipedia user (also User:mschwerin). As this user was blocked by you (or so I understand) I'm asking your help/ advice.
Thanks, Maximilian — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.91.135.48 (talk) 09:47, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
- Not sure how to help; it's blocking your ability to use the unified log in tool altogether? I can unblock that account for a short time and then re-block it when you're done if that helps. Kuru (talk) 11:37, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
User:Davidlee804
You deleted an unblock request from his talk page in which he made uncivil remarks toward other editors and the project. I restored his comments, because they aren't hurting anyone but him, and because no-one is likely to unblock. No objection to denying the request. If he persists in incivility, he could be blocked from editing his talk page. Regards, Edison (talk) 00:33, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, that's an overly passive response to a vandalism only account. If no one is likely to unblock, then removing the trolling and removing his ability to waste the time of valuable editors is an appropriate response. In the future, it may be move helpful to actually address the unblock request if you feel the need to revert my resolution, instead of leaving it for another to resolve. Kuru (talk) 01:43, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
ZRegarding hte external link
I don't want any link juice for my website. I just want to add my erp software to the ERP software list. Please let me know how can i add my software. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polymermold (talk • contribs) 13:49, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
- The criteria for inclusion on that page is either a notable product or a notable company. In this case, creating an article for the software that is reliably sourced and meets our inclusion criteria is a good first step. Kuru (talk) 23:16, 14 May 2013 (UTC)
The edits of Mrm7171
Thank you DVdm. I would like to discuss edits with Mrm7171 but it is strange that he/she declines to discuss.Iss246 (talk) 15:02, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
- Quite indeed. You did your utter best trying to discuss, but this seems not to work. A different approach is clearly called for here. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 15:49, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Mrm7171
I have a complaint about Mrm7171. He plays a double game. I try to discuss edits with him on his talk page. Then he goes ahead and makes edits without discussing them. And finally writes:
(diff | hist) . . m Occupational health psychology; 02:54 . . (+57) . . Mrm7171 (talk | contribs) (Just made a couple of very minor additions. Did not delete or undo anyone elses edits. Please discuss with me on my talk page to come to consensus.Thanks)
(diff | hist) . . m Occupational health psychology; 02:51 . . (+9) . . Mrm7171 (talk | contribs) (One word added. No deletion of any other editors work made out of respect. We need to discuss. Please use my talk page. Please don't just remove. Thanks)
(diff | hist) . . m Occupational health psychology; 02:50 . . (+25) . . Mrm7171 (talk | contribs) (Please discuss on my talk page iss246 rather than undo my minor edit or engage in edit war. Please don't iss246. It's better to discuss than you delete. thanks)
Meanwhile, he includes text that occupational health psychology is a subfield of i/o psychology when I have labored on his talk page to explain that OHP is not a subfield of i/o psychology just as i/o psychology is not a subfield of social psychology and psychometrics or that health psychology is not a subfield of clinical psychology. I view what he has done as bad faith. This includes his groveling, with purposeful bad grammar, about how he has been picked on on May 26, 2013:
[[Category:{{unblock| Thats cool. I'm still very unclear abvout talk page and feel administrator may have acted a liottle demeaning. Not sure if new users have difficulty that experienced users should act sartcastically or bullying toieard new experienced userts like myself? I gfeel pretty bullied. Sorry but just a new inexperioenced user. ]]
[[Category:[[Category:{{unblock| Thats okay will cop it. and wait fdor the 48 hourts. Feel pretty bullied and didn't need sarcasm or demeaning me by experienced wikipedia user. Could hjabe treated he with more respect. I'm just not sure how it all works yet. Wonderion g why kuru was so demeaning, demoralising of new user inexperien ced like myself. Didnbt need to be put down or fdinger in my chest so much kuyru, just a new user. inexperienced could have been a little more cool about it all though kuriu, instead of tryting tgo put me down so basdly and disreszpect me so badly.....]]
I've been patient with him. I find him full of bad faith. This sing-song of "let's discuss" and then he goes ahead and makes a bold move without sources that OHP is a subfield of i/o psychology. I think he should be barred from Wikipedia for his double-talk.Iss246 (talk) 04:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Hydronymy
Hallo, I am interested in hydronymy as it looks the language of prehistoric Europe is reflected therein. I left a message on the wikiproject rivers talkpage, just looking for editors with similar interests to exchange information. I have discovered the so called old european hydronymy is not limited to Europe but has many correspondences in Iran, India and furhter away so I think this disproves the current scholarly etymological interpretations. Presently I am trying to research Bengal and Burma. Thanks for reading.Aldrasto11 (talk) 11:22, 3 June 2013 (UTC)