Welcome to my talk page!
This Kudpung has been here since 2006 and is not connected with users with similar names.
|
User:Kudpung has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | ||
For moving the workshop on sticky prods along, and taking the time to update so many editors, and working to encourage moderate and organized discussion. Maurreen (talk) 21:19, 7 March 2010 (UTC) |
The Original Barnstar | ||
For major housekeeping and recruitment of participants at the sticky prod workshop. Maurreen (talk) 07:48, 4 April 2010 (UTC) |
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | |
For offering your time and effort on an article you were previously unrelated with, and doing this exemplarily Chipmunkdavis (talk) 12:09, 10 August 2010 (UTC) |
The Socratic Barnstar | ||
For elucidating your arguments so clearly, to the point where even your formatting helped to convey your point across Chipmunkdavis (talk) 12:09, 10 August 2010 (UTC) |
The Guidance Barnstar | ||
for actually being helpful to a new user Aisha9152 (talk) 20:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC) |
Note
Please do not edit archives as you did here. If you have new information, create a new entry on the correct board. I have reverted the change. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- Don't you agree that some action needs to be taken beyond my innocent lapse in knowing that archives should not of course be edited? Fact is, as I was linked directly to it, and as it had never been closed, I actually failed to notice that it was an archived page until it was too late. Perhaps you could do something about it, as it was just allowed to lapse last time. --Kudpung (talk) 11:20, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- First, as per the notice when you edit my talkpage, do not use talkback templates there. Second, the reason it got archived is because none of the dozens of admins who monitor ANI felt it required actions. Third, I will not unilaterally impose something based on the results of #2. If you feel action needs to be taken because additional problems have resurfaced, make a new report at ANI - reference the original, and provide complete diff's of the newer problems. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:28, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
Hello. Thank you for your message relating to my article placed on Wikipedia. I am still trying to get to grips with the whole system and how to correctly use the site. I will endeavour to reference any further article I add so that the inclusions I make are considered legitimate. Thank you again for your message and I will probably be in touch when I encounter another problem. Thanks again (Rain391 (talk) 14:26, 31 October 2010 (UTC)) l
- Don't worry. It hasn't been listed for deletion, but you quickly need to ais is to take a look at other articles about small places such as for example Sherrard's Green, open them in editing mode and see how they have been put together (don't change anything in there though!). --Kudpung (talk) 15:04, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Could you take a look at this so you can get an idea what is going on. I have added your talkpage to my watchlist. Might I suggest you add the Groves article to yours because the propagandizing and editorializing are nowhere near done yet. I am so tired of being outnumbered and marginalized. To have a disinterested editor with at least an open mind monitoring the page's editing would be in keeping with Wikipedia's mission to be an encyclopaedia, not a site where propagandists can work unchecked by manipulating and bullying the system. You have that discretion under WP:IAR. Just compare my edits with those of the editor who immediately gutted them. Thanks. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 14:37, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- Hi. I've just left a new comment there already. I have on my watchlist every single page I have ever visited or edited in this encyclopedia, but I think it's now over to you guys. I don't see my rôle as a teacher invigilating an exam, and I think the WP:EAR department has done what it can. If there are serious breaches in content or behaviour policy, as a very last resort the editors concerned will have to make a list of diffs and a perfectly documented rationale and take it to the appropriate dispute resolution board. I hope you'll be able to resolve your differences and collaborate together without such drastic recourse. Avoidance of heated language goes a huge way in getting things sorted out.--Kudpung (talk) 14:54, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
: Hi. I am assuming you may be asleep as according to this page it is 1:56 AM right now where you live. I won't expect a response then until your convenience. I just wanted to let you know I responded to the other editor and would like to get back to editing the Groves page, but am afraid to do so now for fear of violating WP:3RR. I know there are exceptions to 3RR (like WP:IAR, et al) but I can't and won't risk being blocked, so when do you think I can start re-editing/fixing the Groves page? Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 19:02, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
- I received a response from the editor with whom I have been in this dispute who states that the Emma Groves article is subject to (see "Community restrictions").
"All articles related to The Troubles, defined as: any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland falls under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per day). When in doubt, assume it is related. Clear vandalism, or edits by anonymous IP editors, may be reverted without penalty Editors who violate this 1RR restriction may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense. If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the guidelines laid out in the above link. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it on this talk page first."
- I received a response from the editor with whom I have been in this dispute who states that the Emma Groves article is subject to (see "Community restrictions").
- I see I was right all along to contact you. Can you tell me how to proceed under WP:1RR when you have the chance. I have never been in this situation. I don't know if his/her action is in response to my messages to you, which he/she probably has read. Thanks. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 19:56, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
ANI Notice regarding User:Kudpung99
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — SpikeToronto 17:51, 31 October 2010 (UTC)