Yearwaves3 (talk | contribs) |
Yearwaves3 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
sorry, but, you better do not edit this page. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Science_and_technology_in_Korea&diff=165268123&oldid=165267210] |
sorry, but, you better do not edit this page. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Science_and_technology_in_Korea&diff=165268123&oldid=165267210] |
||
you think Rome territory is alaska? [[User:Yearwaves3|Yearwaves3]] 21:39, 17 October 2007 (UTC) |
you think Rome territory is alaska? [[User:Yearwaves3|Yearwaves3]] 21:39, 17 October 2007 (UTC) |
||
{{{icon|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:{{{1}}}]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> |
Revision as of 21:39, 17 October 2007
Arbitration
You're one of the parties for this arbitration case that I'm filing. The link to the arbitration is at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Current_requests. (Wikimachine 03:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC))
provocative
Is there a reason as to why I should not use the above word? was my understanding of the word, not correct? or are the Japanese govt and people not provoked by Korea's actions?
one last point, with no offence intended, as someone Korean, are you sure it would not be better for someone unbiased, to make such calls? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sennen goroshi (talk • contribs) 20:03, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Umm, did you actually revert an admin's rv? (Wikimachine 15:34, 3 September 2007 (UTC))
- I'm sure it would excite you if I did, but to tell the truth, I don't base my edits on the person who makes them. However, I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but in this case, no I didn't revert an admin's rv, I reverted someone else, and I was reverted by an admin...but anyway, thanks for caring.Sennen goroshi 14:07, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- I think he was talking to me; I believe I did revert one. Admins are editors just like anyone else, and can make mistakes, too. --Cheers, Komdori 14:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
- either way, I am trying hard to think of a nice and wikipedia suitable way of saying he his a stick in his ass. I can't think of a suitable way as yet.Sennen goroshi 14:20, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks..
..for the reformatting on my talk page. I was just too lazy to do it myself, so thanks. As for that star I have no idea what it is about, so I just decided to ignore it. Phonemonkey 19:41, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
Liancourt Rocks
Hi, I thought I was explaining the reasons. The article cited does not say that South Korea subsidizes the livelihoods in order to justify their claim. It's common for countries to build housing and infrastructure, even provide living subsidies through tax credits and such, in outlying areas, so the previous wording sounded very biased to me. But whatever you or I think, the accusatory tone was not founded in the cited source, so should be out, don't you agree? —Preceding unsigned comment added by NIYet (talk • contribs) 20:14, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
- It might be better to talk about this on the talk page for the article; certainly it's not an uncontroversial change, so it would be better to avoid edit warring. If you like, add a fact tag, I recall seeing something specific about habitation claims. There is a marked difference between attracting residents to an undisputed and habitable outlying area and paying someone to live on disputed uninhabitable rocks to satisfy some UN requirements. --Cheers, Komdori 20:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
Hi, I made an edit a couple of weeks ago giving reference to the alternative names in the lead. The lead at that stage read (I copied and pasted but there were also wikilinks):
- The Sea of Japan (occasionally referred to as the East Sea) is a marginal sea of the western Pacific Ocean, bordered by Japan, Korea and Russia. Like the Mediterranean Sea, it has almost no tides due to its nearly complete enclosure.
With hindsight, I propose that it should instead have read:
- The Sea of Japan (sometimes referred to as the East Sea) is a marginal sea of the western Pacific Ocean, bordered by Japan, Korea and Russia. Like the Mediterranean Sea, it has almost no tides due to its nearly complete enclosure.
There appears to be consensus for this here, insofar as no editor has explained reservations with Kusunose's proposal, which I had assumed statistically would have happened if there were an objection, based on number of edits to the page and specifically in relation to the matter, and the amount of time that has elapsed since the proposal.
I haven't reverted your edit because I believe discussion should always come before editing, but would like to hear your view on the matter. BeL1EveR 23:30, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
report
Don't worry, even after my self revert, I was watching the watchlist for familiar immediate-report made by you or your friend. And I already left a comment there too. Good friend100 21:45, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Need Citation
need publicity source. [1] do you count number of each country's war? please prove it. Yearwaves3 21:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what your point is, could you please explain? --Cheers, Komdori 21:04, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- "numerous" and "several" mean. did you count how many number of each country's war? please prove it by publicity and trustworthy source.Yearwaves3 21:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, what is your point? Numerous and several both mean just that--more than one. Are you suggesting Goguryeo had only one conflict ever? --Cheers, Komdori 21:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- your edit mean goguryoe was much more war with silla and baekjae than china. we need citation. Yearwaves3 21:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but you have misunderstood the words. I suggest take a look at some of the many excellent online English dictionaries, such as Microsoft's. --Cheers, Komdori 21:20, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- don't you know "numerous" and "several" mean? your edit mean goguryoe was much more war with silla and baekjae than china. we need citation. cleary you don't know about goguryoe history. you better do not edit goguryeo. you change with out "fact". don't do that. Yearwaves3 21:31, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- your edit mean goguryoe was much more war with silla and baekjae than china. we need citation. Yearwaves3 21:15, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, what is your point? Numerous and several both mean just that--more than one. Are you suggesting Goguryeo had only one conflict ever? --Cheers, Komdori 21:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- "numerous" and "several" mean. did you count how many number of each country's war? please prove it by publicity and trustworthy source.Yearwaves3 21:07, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Rome is not alaska.
sorry, but, you better do not edit this page. [2] you think Rome territory is alaska? Yearwaves3 21:39, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors.