Kolya Butternut (talk | contribs) |
→Notice - Discretionary Sanctions related to gender: new section Tag: contentious topics alert |
||
Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
::Do you not know how to add the source you found? If that's the problem, I'll do it for you. Otherwise, please add it now! --[[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 12:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC) |
::Do you not know how to add the source you found? If that's the problem, I'll do it for you. Otherwise, please add it now! --[[User:SergeWoodzing|SergeWoodzing]] ([[User talk:SergeWoodzing|talk]]) 12:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC) |
||
:::As I said, I disagree with you that a source is appropriate. [[User:Kolya Butternut|Kolya Butternut]] ([[User talk:Kolya Butternut#top|talk]]) 13:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC) |
:::As I said, I disagree with you that a source is appropriate. [[User:Kolya Butternut|Kolya Butternut]] ([[User talk:Kolya Butternut#top|talk]]) 13:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC) |
||
== Notice - Discretionary Sanctions related to gender == |
|||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
|||
You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. |
|||
For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
|||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
|||
Please see the Arcom decision at the following link for relevant principles and standards of behavior. |
|||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate#Final_decision |
|||
[[User:SPECIFICO |<b style="color: #0011FF;"> SPECIFICO</b>]][[User_talk:SPECIFICO | ''talk'']] 17:20, 31 August 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:20, 31 August 2020
|
|||||
A belated welcome!
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Kolya Butternut. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Editor's index to Wikipedia
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.
Again, welcome! Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 13:26, 2 November 2016 (UTC)
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction
The following sanction now applies to you:
You have been topic-banned from any pages or discussions related to 2020 United States presidential election, candidates, issues and events, broadly construed for a period of six months
You have been sanctioned for refusal to listen and accept feedback/consensus, and for escalatory and copious rhetoric, which has disrupted editing and admining in this topic area; example, discussions here, here, here, here and here.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Abecedare (talk) 22:02, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
This edit seems unwise to me. I would like to avoid seeing more editors banned or blocked out of editing in the topic area concerned, so I would suggest trying a less WP:BAIT-ey approach in future. Regards. Newimpartial (talk) 13:59, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
- Apparently it was unwise, but it was a literal question, referencing my previous use of the term, meant to be blunt not baity. Kolya Butternut (talk) 15:44, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
Ansari
Please use the article talk page and dispute resolution channels and do not keep inserting UNDUE negative content in the lead. You risk sanctions. SPECIFICO talk 02:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- SPECIFICO, it is you who is edit warring and now misrepresenting events. You reverted longstanding text,[1] and I restored it. At that point you should have taken it to the talk page but instead reverted it again.[2] This follows your edit in April where you removed text with false information in your edit summary, and you had never edited this article before until that time when I was editing it. Do not come back to my talk page about this; continue this discussion at the article talk page. Kolya Butternut (talk) 03:14, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- I have been editing that article since January 2018, when the woman first promoted this dubious, trivial internet controversy. So I have been editing that page for roughly a year and a half before your first edit there. Facts matter.
- BLP is a cardinal policy on this site. It is also important not to make false statements about other editors, such as your apparent insinuation that I followed you to that page with some sort of bad edit. Please review WP:ASPERSIONS and WP:BLP. SPECIFICO talk 10:50, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
- You haven't been editing that page since January 2018; you edited it for a month at that time and then you came back this April and made an improper reversion of my edit at the time we were having a dispute. I apologize for misremembering that you had never edited it.
- You came to my talk page with false accusations of edit warring which you have not apologized for. I asked you to stay off my talk page and yet you responded and with more threats and superficially civil incivility. As I see no evidence of this behavior changing I am asking you to stay off my whole talk page for good. Kolya Butternut (talk) 13:12, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
Drag king image
I was very disappointed to see that you had added a photo again where I had advised you how important it is to add a source and a name to the caption, but that you did not do anyway. Don't really know how you can feel it's constructive to challenge me like that. It's not. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 22:04, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- SergeWoodzing, you asked me to add a source and a caption,[3] without providing any policy justification, and I saw no need for it. Per WP:PRESERVE, if you think my edit could be improved please improve it yourself, but do not keep removing edits which improve the encyclopedia without citing any policy reason to do so; I feel it is disruptive. I have repeatedly explained to you that drag kings are not necessarily professionals -- that anyone can go to a party and choose to be a drag king for the night. Perhaps the lead sentence of Drag King should be changed to be like Drag queen, which states:
A drag queen is a person, usually male, who uses drag clothing and makeup to imitate and often exaggerate female gender signifiers and gender roles for entertainment purposes.
Drag king even states that theterm drag king is sometimes used in a broader sense, to include female-bodied people who dress in traditionally masculine clothing for other reasons.
- Even though you have provided no justification for requiring the lead image to depict a notable professional drag king, I have provided you with a source.[4] If you continue reverting edits with no policy justification I will have to go to the edit warring noticeboard. Kolya Butternut (talk) 23:01, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Do you not know how to add the source you found? If that's the problem, I'll do it for you. Otherwise, please add it now! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- As I said, I disagree with you that a source is appropriate. Kolya Butternut (talk) 13:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
- Do you not know how to add the source you found? If that's the problem, I'll do it for you. Otherwise, please add it now! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 12:55, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Please see the Arcom decision at the following link for relevant principles and standards of behavior. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GamerGate#Final_decision SPECIFICO talk 17:20, 31 August 2020 (UTC)