Aman.kumar.goel (talk | contribs) →RfC notice: DS alert. Tags: contentious topics alert Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
This is a neutral notice sent to all non-bot/non-blocked registered users who edited [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics]] in the past year that there is a new request for comment at {{section link|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics|RfC: Where should so-called voiceless approximants be covered?}}. [[User:Nardog|Nardog]] ([[User talk:Nardog|talk]]) 10:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC) |
This is a neutral notice sent to all non-bot/non-blocked registered users who edited [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics]] in the past year that there is a new request for comment at {{section link|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics|RfC: Where should so-called voiceless approximants be covered?}}. [[User:Nardog|Nardog]] ([[User talk:Nardog|talk]]) 10:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC) |
||
== DS Alert == |
|||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
|||
You have shown interest in [[India]], [[Pakistan]], and [[Afghanistan]]. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. |
|||
For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
|||
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
|||
'''[[User:Aman.kumar.goel|Aman Kumar Goel]]''' <sup>(''[[User talk:Aman.kumar.goel|Talk]]'')</sup> 05:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC) |
|||
==Respect consensus== |
|||
You have been regressively attempting to establish Dhaka prevalence without gaining any consensus.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bakarkhani&diff=1049268601&oldid=1049202848][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bakarkhani&diff=1048792606&oldid=1048713864] You must give up edit warring over the undue quotations. |
|||
Your edit summaries are also misleading. I see a total of 4 mentions of "quotefarming" in 4 different messages, written at [[Talk:Bakarkhani]] as opposition to this [[WP:DE]]. The message I made at 03:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC) is also clear enough about your nationalizing of Bakarkhani. Your own [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bakarkhani&diff=1049268601&oldid=1049202848 reverts] now removing details about the strong presence of this cuisine elsewhere make it even more apparent. |
|||
I have already described the issues enough times and I won't do it all the time. |
|||
Even if you think you can dictate after all that, still, [[WP:CONSENSUS]] matters most which you don't have. |
|||
Try an RfC or any other methods at [[WP:DR]], but don't edit war now. '''[[User:Aman.kumar.goel|Aman Kumar Goel]]''' <sup>(''[[User talk:Aman.kumar.goel|Talk]]'')</sup> 05:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:16, 11 October 2021
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
A plate of Shorshe Ilish for you
A piece of Shorshe Ilish for you | ||
Here is a piece of Shorshe Ilish for you. Shorshe Ilish, a Bengali dish made of Hilsa fish and it is mostly popular in Eastern India and Bangladesh. Thank you. Titodutta (talk) 04:42, 28 May 2021 (UTC) |
- Titodutta, thanks, one of my favorites. :) Sorry for the late response, have been a little busy with RL. How is everything? Hope you're doing well. --Zayeem (talk) 02:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
RfC notice
This is a neutral notice sent to all non-bot/non-blocked registered users who edited Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics in the past year that there is a new request for comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics § RfC: Where should so-called voiceless approximants be covered?. Nardog (talk) 10:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
DS Alert
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 05:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Respect consensus
You have been regressively attempting to establish Dhaka prevalence without gaining any consensus.[1][2] You must give up edit warring over the undue quotations.
Your edit summaries are also misleading. I see a total of 4 mentions of "quotefarming" in 4 different messages, written at Talk:Bakarkhani as opposition to this WP:DE. The message I made at 03:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC) is also clear enough about your nationalizing of Bakarkhani. Your own reverts now removing details about the strong presence of this cuisine elsewhere make it even more apparent.
I have already described the issues enough times and I won't do it all the time.
Even if you think you can dictate after all that, still, WP:CONSENSUS matters most which you don't have.
Try an RfC or any other methods at WP:DR, but don't edit war now. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 05:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)