Renamed user U1krw4txwPvuEp3lqV382vOcqa7 (talk | contribs) →December 2019: ds alert ipa Tag: contentious topics alert |
I am penalized under which rule ? What is my mistake ? Trying to check in detail the article two times ? |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> --''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .5em LightSkyBlue;">[[User:DBigXray|Happy Holidays! ᗙ D<span style="color:#DA500B">Big</span>]][[User talk:DBigXray|X<span style="color:#10AD00">ray</span>ᗙ]]</span>'' 08:36, 26 December 2019 (UTC) |
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> --''<span style="text-shadow:0px 0px .5em LightSkyBlue;">[[User:DBigXray|Happy Holidays! ᗙ D<span style="color:#DA500B">Big</span>]][[User talk:DBigXray|X<span style="color:#10AD00">ray</span>ᗙ]]</span>'' 08:36, 26 December 2019 (UTC) |
||
The other user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vanamonde93 who posted on my talk page is writing that one has to follow [[The three-revert rule]]. I edited only twice and that too only to better the article. So, which rule applies - the one citied by User:Vanamonde93 or any other rule. And I posted on your wall, but you never answered any of my queries like giving a few source links which you claim as poor sourcing. I rechecked all links again and corrected the hearsay, non-neutrality and other errors in the article. Still, why action on me ? What is my fault ? [[User:Kmoksha|Kmoksha]] ([[User talk:Kmoksha#top|talk]]) 09:38, 26 December 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 09:38, 26 December 2019
Welcome!
Hello, Kmoksha, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Economic Dave (talk) 20:28, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Vanamonde (Talk) 08:33, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Template:Z33 --Happy Holidays! ᗙ DBigXrayᗙ 08:36, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
The other user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Vanamonde93 who posted on my talk page is writing that one has to follow The three-revert rule. I edited only twice and that too only to better the article. So, which rule applies - the one citied by User:Vanamonde93 or any other rule. And I posted on your wall, but you never answered any of my queries like giving a few source links which you claim as poor sourcing. I rechecked all links again and corrected the hearsay, non-neutrality and other errors in the article. Still, why action on me ? What is my fault ? Kmoksha (talk) 09:38, 26 December 2019 (UTC)