Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) |
Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
Hi, I see you closed the above deletion discussion as no consensus. While there was not a lot of debate the only people that actually posted were for delete - so why the no consensus? [[User:Noq|noq]] ([[User talk:Noq|talk]]) 00:36, 12 June 2010 (UTC) |
Hi, I see you closed the above deletion discussion as no consensus. While there was not a lot of debate the only people that actually posted were for delete - so why the no consensus? [[User:Noq|noq]] ([[User talk:Noq|talk]]) 00:36, 12 June 2010 (UTC) |
||
{{tps}} My guess is that while the only !voter bolded "weak delete", the text of the comment showed that she really wasn't sure and one !vote is hardly a consensus. I'll let "king of" elaborate further. One thing is certain. That article is in serious need of a visit from the "source fairy". --[[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 01:04, 12 June 2010 (UTC) |
:{{tps}} My guess is that while the only !voter bolded "weak delete", the text of the comment showed that she really wasn't sure and one !vote is hardly a consensus. I'll let "king of" elaborate further. One thing is certain. That article is in serious need of a visit from the "source fairy". --[[User:Ron Ritzman|Ron Ritzman]] ([[User talk:Ron Ritzman|talk]]) 01:04, 12 June 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:04, 12 June 2010
Old talk is at /Archive.
Please note that I will usually reply to messages on this page, unless you ask me to respond elsewhere.
Please use the link provided in the blue box above which says "Please leave a new message."
This way, you will be able to give your comment a subject/headline.
If an admin action made by me is more than a year old, you may reverse or modify it without consulting me first. However, I would appreciate being notified after the fact.
Deletion review for Mikie Da Poet
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Mikie Da Poet. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Politowski55 (talk) 05:36, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010
- Photography: Making money with free photos
- News and notes: Wikimedians at Maker Faire, brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Zoo
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Velayudham (reply)
Yes, I did before but later the film had progressed significantly so I decided that it can be kept. The AFD tag was removed so I also thought the decision was to keep it. Is there any way you could bring it back? Eelam StyleZ (talk) 13:11, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
FYI
At Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Chicago skyline at sunrise, you expressed an opinion on the current nomination at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Chicago skyline image replacement--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:43, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
Deleted
Finally Death and Adjustment Hypotheses article at wiki got deleted. I am not surprised, but the reason for the deletion as it was deleted previously seemed less useful as things evolve, change. Anyway, Just wanted to let you know as I informed you while I created it.Shoovrow (talk) 17:04, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/85/Smiley.svg/100px-Smiley.svg.png)
King of Hearts - Thank for your participation and support in my RfA.
I can honestly say that your comments and your trust in me are greatly appreciated.
Please let me know if you ever have any suggestions for me as an editor, or comments based on my admin actions.
Thank you! 7 22:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
(Untitled)
Hi, I still believe an article of mine was wrongfully deleted. I followed all of the steps and I wanted to let you know that I am open to answering any questions you may have. The page that was deleted was titled "Mikie Da Poet". As seen here, I have created a new userspace and added facts and supporting references to back up all the information that was considered false at one time. Here's the link to it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Politowski55/Mikie_Da_Poet Politowski55 (talk) 05:43, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, you still have not provided sources establishing enough notability. Facebook is not considered a reliable source. iTunes and Yahoo! Music are mere listings, which constitute trivial coverage. Fox News is a reliable source, but do you have more sources to show this isn't just a special interest story? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:33, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010
- From the team: Changes to the Signpost
- News and notes: "Pending changes" trial, Chief hires, British Museum prizes, Interwiki debate, and more
- Free Travel-Shirts: "Free Travel-Shirts" signed by Jimmy Wales and others purchasable
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Comedy
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Happy Birthday King of Hearts
Deletion review for Paint Crew
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Paint Crew. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Stifle (talk) 12:54, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi, I see you closed the above deletion discussion as no consensus. While there was not a lot of debate the only people that actually posted were for delete - so why the no consensus? noq (talk) 00:36, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) My guess is that while the only !voter bolded "weak delete", the text of the comment showed that she really wasn't sure and one !vote is hardly a consensus. I'll let "king of" elaborate further. One thing is certain. That article is in serious need of a visit from the "source fairy". --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:04, 12 June 2010 (UTC)