|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
User talk:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Editing Principles - some things that i considered for the ArbCom case, but on seeing how it developed into person-problems rather than content and editing issues, didn't put in after all.
LoS: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/LoS
Playground: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Temporary User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Sandbox
Inhofe list: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/Inhofe
William list: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/William
Created articles: Sami Solanki, Jan Esper
Linux Weight: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/LinuxWeight
CCD: User:KimDabelsteinPetersen/CCD
Fossil treelines, et al
This is really a "thank you" for challenging my thinking, and catching a dumb error, over at the HS page. What a pleasure, particularly compared to interacting with the Wikilawyer at the Other Page... Once again, welcome back, and stay sharp! Cheers -- Pete Tillman
Danish and Danes
Hello again, I just wanted to say that I appreciate the respectful way in which you showed me I was being a jackass. I do now realize that I shouldn't edit as if things are still the way they were 100 years ago in France. Feel free to change any edits that I have made that you feel where inappropriate, I only intended to work on that topic for that afternoon, and I am not territorial about edits I have made.
On a mildly-related note, while we were talking about page titles I realized that Danes and Danish people had a split history due to a cut-and-paste page move. This has now been fixed, but I am not sure which of the titles is more appropriate. If "Dane" is more appropriate, I would think it would be at Dane (people). Since you claim denne bruger har dansk som modersmål, I thought you might have an informed opinion. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 00:52, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
(",)
- Thank you for you contributions to Talk:Regional effects of global warming. Please see wp:Tea.
- Thank you regarding Talk:Global warming (see related Talk:Climate change) too. 99.119.131.192 (talk) 00:55, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
If still of interest
It appears Talk:Regional effects of global warming is awaiting your continued involvement. 99.181.147.154 (talk) 22:34, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Can I move it?
Kim so far you and I are the only ones to comment under "specific ideas" section on List of sci opposing blah blah blah. May I have your permission to move that subthread to a thread all of its own? (or if you beat me to it and want to please do) NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 11:25, 25 August 2012 (UTC)