Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 8 discussion(s) to User talk:Kennyalley/Archive 1) (bot |
+ANI notice |
||
Line 31:
'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''—especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Oshwah|<b><span style="color:#C00000">~Oshwah~</span></b>]]<sup><small><b>[[User_talk:Oshwah|<span style="color:blue">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Oshwah|<span style="color:green">(contribs)</span>]]</b></small></sup> 05:48, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
== ANI notice ==
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> The discussion regarding edits that you're involved with can be found by clicking [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Kennyalley spamming Wikidata|here]]. [[User:Oshwah|<b><span style="color:#C00000">~Oshwah~</span></b>]]<sup><small><b>[[User_talk:Oshwah|<span style="color:blue">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Oshwah|<span style="color:green">(contribs)</span>]]</b></small></sup> 05:53, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
|
Revision as of 05:54, 29 December 2018
Don't be immature
You have been told before (above) that you shouldn't add wikidata boxes to articles so please stop. IWI (chat) 23:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Kennyalley spamming wikidata. IWI (chat) 00:28, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your addition of Wikidata infoboxes, as they may be inaccurate. IWI (chat) 12:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- please stop reverting infoboxes with accurate information in them, and edit wikidata to improve information accuracy. Kennyalley (talk) 17:13, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Johnbod: Stop your edit warring. Consensus has dictated that we don't use Wikidata infoboxes anymore. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. IWI (chat) 17:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- [citation needed], the link, you directed me to read, does not demonstrate a consensus. your strongly held POV about infoboxes, tends to lead you to make false statements, so you will need to demonstrate a quote and citation. Kennyalley (talk) 20:00, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- @Johnbod: Stop your edit warring. Consensus has dictated that we don't use Wikidata infoboxes anymore. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. IWI (chat) 17:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
That wasn’t me who directed you there for one thing. Just use a normal infobox and stop this. It’s so time consuming. IWI (chat) 13:40, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
- you made yet another false statement, about that discussion. your whiney appeal to admins could not find a consensus for what you are doing. stop making false statements; stop leaving messages on this talk page. Kennyalley (talk) 20:08, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
This message was not left by me so no, I did not make a false statement. That is the second time you have accused me of being deliberately deceptive falsely. Please read our personal attacks policy. IWI (chat) 00:15, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 28 December 2018 (UTC)
December 2018
Your recent editing history at Anna Anni shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:48, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion regarding edits that you're involved with can be found by clicking here. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:53, 29 December 2018 (UTC)