Winged Blades of Godric (talk | contribs) m Please check the discussion at Talk:Ramgarhia#appalled (TW) |
JosephusOfJerusalem (talk | contribs) →Your final warning: new section |
||
Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
==Discussion at [[Talk:Ramgarhia#appalled]]== |
==Discussion at [[Talk:Ramgarhia#appalled]]== |
||
[[File:Farm-Fresh eye.png|15px|link=|alt=]] You are invited to join the discussion at [[Talk:Ramgarhia#appalled]].  You may be interested. [[User:Winged Blades of Godric|<span style= "color:green">''Winged Blades''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Winged Blades of Godric|<span style= "color:green">Godric</span>]]</sup> 07:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC){{Z48}}<!-- [[Template:Please see]] --> |
[[File:Farm-Fresh eye.png|15px|link=|alt=]] You are invited to join the discussion at [[Talk:Ramgarhia#appalled]].  You may be interested. [[User:Winged Blades of Godric|<span style= "color:green">''Winged Blades''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Winged Blades of Godric|<span style= "color:green">Godric</span>]]</sup> 07:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC){{Z48}}<!-- [[Template:Please see]] --> |
||
== Your final warning == |
|||
You appear to be repeatedly [[Help:Reverting|reverting or undoing]] other editors' contributions at [[:Kashmiris]]. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "[[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]" and is usually seen as obstructing the [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|normal editing process]], as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] on the [[:Talk:Lashkar-e-Taiba|talk page]]. |
|||
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> [[User:JosephusOfJerusalem|JosephusOfJerusalem]] ([[User talk:JosephusOfJerusalem|talk]]) 15:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:01, 10 January 2018
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
Please comment on Talk:Israel
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Israel. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018! | |
Hello Kautilya3, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2018. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
- Thank you MBlaze Lightning. Wish you a great bunch of holidays in turn. Happy editing! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:20, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
You reverted my recent edit with the comment "we need to WP:STICKTOSOURCE; there is no evidence that Nehru ever thought of Hyderabad as an independent state". But this is utterly absurd! When the British withdrew from India in 1947, all their subsidiary alliances were abandoned. The princely states had never been part of British India, so they could not be handed over to the two new Dominions created from the British possessions. Pursuant to the Indian Independence Act 1947 they became completely independent, unless and until they acceded to one of the new Dominions, which most of them speedily did, although the process was slow in the case of the Princely States of Pakistan. A series of wars was fought between India and Pakistan precisely because Kashmir was left as an independent state. The Nizam of Hyderabad fought hard to retain his independence. Do you really not grasp any of this? Moonraker (talk) 05:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Moonraker (talk) 05:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- I am afraid this is a WP:FORUMy discussion. Please follow the Wikipedia policies on reliable sourcing. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:14, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- I am glad you do not dispute the historic facts I have mentioned above. If you have concerns about sourcing, it would be better for you to add a {{cn}} template, rather than removing information from am article because you have a POV objection to it. Moonraker (talk) 06:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC) Moonraker (talk) 06:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- The very fact that you call the above post "historical facts" is troublesome, because it is full of your personal interpretations. I do not care to "dispute them" because that is precisely what a WP:FORUMy discussion is. If you want to engage in such debates, please find Reddit or some such debating forum, not Wikipedia. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- You seem unable to comprehend that you have modified a direct quote (of Noorani's analysis of Nehru's views) with your own WP:OR is quite astonishing, given your experience. If you persist with this practice, I am afraid you will end up at WP:ARE. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:07, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- I am glad you do not dispute the historic facts I have mentioned above. If you have concerns about sourcing, it would be better for you to add a {{cn}} template, rather than removing information from am article because you have a POV objection to it. Moonraker (talk) 06:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC) Moonraker (talk) 06:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Canada
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Canada. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:United States recognition of Jerusalem
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States recognition of Jerusalem. Legobot (talk) 04:45, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump–Russia dossier
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump–Russia dossier. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Russian presidential election, 2018
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Russian presidential election, 2018. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Warning
Hello, I'm Josephus. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit:[1] to Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus seemed less than neutral. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. JosephusOfJerusalem (talk) 09:37, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
A detailed warning
I see that you have removed content cited to RS with a tendentious edit summary. Very interestingly the sequence of events I see on the page is that Anmolbhat has added a wall of clobbered Hindu POV text (copyright too I suspect) [2] which you conveniently are not worried about. Then comes along NadirAli who has added properly cited information [3] which happens to be too neutral for Hindu POV. You first try to soften the wording from ″false propaganda″ to ″exaggerated″ [4]. When NadirAli then tells you to WP:STICKTOSOURCE [5] you then remove the entire text he added,[6] although you had no issue with that text's presence earlier. All this is a display of tendentious editing and if you do not cease this disruptive behaviour you will soon find yourself in an AE or ANI thread justifying why Wikipedia should still allow such editing. JosephusOfJerusalem (talk) 09:38, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- I have no idea what you are warning me about. I have deleted UNDUE content and explained why I did so on the talk page. All further discussion takes place there. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
- Oh you know perfectly well what you have done under the guise of WP:UNDUE. The content discussions can go on but the behavioural warning goes here. Any further display of tendentiousness will have severe consequences according to Wikipedia policies. JosephusOfJerusalem (talk) 10:41, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Ramgarhia#appalled
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Ramgarhia#appalled. You may be interested. Winged BladesGodric 07:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Template:Z48
Your final warning
You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Kashmiris. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. JosephusOfJerusalem (talk) 15:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)