Huzaifa Sattar (talk | contribs) Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
== jammu and Kashmir == |
== jammu and Kashmir == |
||
Hi do you think jammu and kashmir is situated in india? Plz think again. You are providing wrong information to others. If we can edit this page independently so, it doesn't mean that you can write on the page what you want. Search before writing please thanks [[User:Huzaifa Sattar|Huzaifa Sattar]] ([[User talk:Huzaifa Sattar|talk]]) 12:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC) |
|||
*Yesterday I reported this {{u|Huzaifa Sattar}} for his continuous disruptive editing on [[Jammu and Kashmir]] but admin didn't block him calling it as "content dispute" and he said "there are some sources which says [[Jammu and Kashmir]] is part of [[Pakistan]] so try dispute resolution". Just because that admin was not knowing depth of this issue this user is still unblocked. --[[User:Human3015|'''<span style="color:Saffron ;">Human</span><span style="color:Red ;">3015</span>''']][[User talk:Human3015|<span style="color:#FA0"> <small>knock knock</small></span>]] • 12:46, 23 July 2015 (UTC) |
*Yesterday I reported this {{u|Huzaifa Sattar}} for his continuous disruptive editing on [[Jammu and Kashmir]] but admin didn't block him calling it as "content dispute" and he said "there are some sources which says [[Jammu and Kashmir]] is part of [[Pakistan]] so try dispute resolution". Just because that admin was not knowing depth of this issue this user is still unblocked. --[[User:Human3015|'''<span style="color:Saffron ;">Human</span><span style="color:Red ;">3015</span>''']][[User talk:Human3015|<span style="color:#FA0"> <small>knock knock</small></span>]] • 12:46, 23 July 2015 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 22:01, 28 July 2015
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
FYI
[1]. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 04:35, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
need support
please do delete the speedy contest deletion message from the article and help to make the article in an elegant manner https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sridhar_babu_addanki swaroop 07:12, 4 July 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sakthi swaroop (talk • contribs)
Nellie Massacre
If your wondering, this discussion ended a long time ago. I forgot to reply to his last statement though. Nonetheless, the user was a sock himself so it truly did end. AcidSnow (talk) 20:02, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
One Last Comment
Hi, it will be better if you make one last comment regarding Kashmir conflict DRN. Probably thread is going to be closed as "failed", User talk:Steven Zhang#Kashmir Conflict. --Human3015 knock knock • 12:15, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
India as a Secular State
Hi Kautilya, you wrote on the Jawaharlal Nehru talk page that you have a physical copy of the book India as a Secular State. This being the case, why don't you consider contributing to the Synopsis section of India as a Secular State? I have so far given the synopsis for the first two parts out of the 7 parts in this book. Please consider giving the synopsis for some of the remaining parts. Soham321 (talk) 03:18, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- You don't have the book yourself? I have a copy borrowed from the library, and have looked at certain portions that were cited here. I haven't read the whole book, or even a substantial portion of it. It is very difficult to write a good synopsis of a deep, scholarly work like this without spending a significant amount of time. A much better strategy is to look through the book reviews, which generally contain a good summary of the contents. The Galanter and Flint reviews would be the first things to look at, because Smith gave them a rejoinder. If you don't have access to JSTOR, I can send you copies of the reviews. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 10:49, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
- I do have a physical copy of the book, otherwise i would not have been able to give the synopsis of the first three (out of seven) sections of the book. I prefer not to rely on reading reviews of the book to give the synopsis of the book. Smith's rejoinder would invariably contain additional material (that is not present in the book) since he was responding to criticism of the book. Soham321 (talk) 16:02, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions notification - India, Pakistan, and Afganistan
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 07:13, 19 July 2015 (UTC)Template:Z33
Mythology Wars
This is an interesting article that places Malhotra c.s. in a context: McComas Taylor (2011), Myhtology Wars: The Indian Diapsora, 'Wendy's Children" and the Struggle for the Hindu Past, Asian Studies Review, June 2011, Vol. 35. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:34, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, I remember reading this last summer when the Doniger book came into news. Prior to that, I didn't know much about RM other than the fact that he was funding Hinduism research. But, yes, attacking Doniger was probably his first project. He then moved on to grander things... - Kautilya3 (talk) 20:10, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
jammu and Kashmir
Hi do you think jammu and kashmir is situated in india? Plz think again. You are providing wrong information to others. If we can edit this page independently so, it doesn't mean that you can write on the page what you want. Search before writing please thanks Huzaifa Sattar (talk) 12:33, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
- Yesterday I reported this Huzaifa Sattar for his continuous disruptive editing on Jammu and Kashmir but admin didn't block him calling it as "content dispute" and he said "there are some sources which says Jammu and Kashmir is part of Pakistan so try dispute resolution". Just because that admin was not knowing depth of this issue this user is still unblocked. --Human3015 knock knock • 12:46, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:United States
The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
Regards form Abv
Hi Kautilya3, Thank you very much for your kind inspiration.
How do i go ahead from here.
Ok understood by using your links in the original message,
Thanks Again
Regards Abbas Banu Vohra Abbasbanuvohra (talk) 07:21, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Abbasbanuvohra:, welcome again to Wikipedia. Indeed, the welcome message on your talk page gives introductory information. If you have any specific questions, please feel free to ask me or Human3015, who has given your welcome message. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 15:37, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
You may want to...
...see Mubarak Ali Gandhi before it goes as {{db-hoax}}
. —SpacemanSpiff 18:54, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Too late, too late! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:02, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Saraswati river
Why are you reverting my edits? I am still in process of writing in full accordance with Wikipedia policies. I am extremely well aware of WP policies and you seem to be acting against them. Please refrain from doing so and give others a chance to present their facts.User:Magicalsaumy (talk) 18:59, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Magalsaumy: The sources should be provided whenever edits are made. You are saying the connection with Haraxvaiti may have been speculative, but who is saying that? There is no point adding such a judgement without an authentic source. - Kautilya3 (talk) 19:02, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- The etymology "she with many lakes" is already present in the Article before my edits. I have provided a source that in Avestan "Vairi" means pond or lake. It logically follows from here that connection with Haraxvaiti may have been speculative. I have not used unencylopedic language that it IS necessarily speculative or it is false. Please note that I have been an editor to WP since the very beginning and mentioning such logic with references is a standard practice done everywhere in WP articles. Nowhere in Wikipedia is each and every sentence and phrase sourced with citation. A WP article is not an academic journal article. We are all human beings and we all use our brain and mind. I am a Student of Historical Linguistics myself and I know very well how false etymologies are used to drive leftist or rightist political ideologies and purported histories. Cygnus_hansa (talk) 19:45, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry this issue is extremely contentious, and everything does need a reliable source. You cannot label scholars' conclusions as "speculations" without other reliable sources saying so, and you have to attribute them with inline attributions. I am surprised that you don't know this since you appear to be an experienced editor. - Kautilya3 (talk) 19:48, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- "It logically follows" - this sounds as WP:OR. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:57, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Well, what can I say? Several articles in Wikipedia have gone bad over the years because of Leftist self-proclaimed keepers of history, who will not allow any WP facts that they don't like under one excuse or another. Wikipedias neutral point of view is reinterpreted with a leftist bias. Many Historians are often leftists themselves because they are bitter about the fact that in the modern Capitalist world, they dont have any value. Cygnus_hansa (talk) 20:05, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- It doesn't bother me to be called a "leftist" or a "rightist" (and I have been called both). But you should note that you should not cast aspersions on other editors. When an admin analyses your editing behaviour, it would count as another negative mark against you. All the best!- Kautilya3 (talk) 10:12, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- Well, what can I say? Several articles in Wikipedia have gone bad over the years because of Leftist self-proclaimed keepers of history, who will not allow any WP facts that they don't like under one excuse or another. Wikipedias neutral point of view is reinterpreted with a leftist bias. Many Historians are often leftists themselves because they are bitter about the fact that in the modern Capitalist world, they dont have any value. Cygnus_hansa (talk) 20:05, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- "It logically follows" - this sounds as WP:OR. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:57, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry this issue is extremely contentious, and everything does need a reliable source. You cannot label scholars' conclusions as "speculations" without other reliable sources saying so, and you have to attribute them with inline attributions. I am surprised that you don't know this since you appear to be an experienced editor. - Kautilya3 (talk) 19:48, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
- The etymology "she with many lakes" is already present in the Article before my edits. I have provided a source that in Avestan "Vairi" means pond or lake. It logically follows from here that connection with Haraxvaiti may have been speculative. I have not used unencylopedic language that it IS necessarily speculative or it is false. Please note that I have been an editor to WP since the very beginning and mentioning such logic with references is a standard practice done everywhere in WP articles. Nowhere in Wikipedia is each and every sentence and phrase sourced with citation. A WP article is not an academic journal article. We are all human beings and we all use our brain and mind. I am a Student of Historical Linguistics myself and I know very well how false etymologies are used to drive leftist or rightist political ideologies and purported histories. Cygnus_hansa (talk) 19:45, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
Last week we were Hindutvas; now we're back at the anti-Hindutva forces again! Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 11:36, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Archives
Hi Kautilya3. Are your archives still functioning? I could try to update/change the bot you're using, if you like. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:30, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- No, I can't get them to work. I just archived a bunch of stuff. Your help in fixing the magic incantations would be great! Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 18:48, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
- I couldn't load your page yesterday when I first came by, so I'm an interested party and fixed it. The problem was you had "Use talk:" instead of "User talk:", at least that's what it looked like. If you have a 31 day old thread left, you can wait for it to archive and check. —SpacemanSpiff 19:22, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
Freedom of religion in India
Your edit here "but the perpetrators have not been prosecuted and remain at large" is not helpful. You say "This is not contentious, there is a link to the main article in the body." but you do not indicate what you consider to be the 'main article' or where the link can be found.
A better course would be to add a reference to the source immediately after the contentious phrase, making sure of course that the source does support the phrase. Apuldram (talk) 10:15, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- @Apuldram: The lead is an overview of the article. We only add citations for contentious issues. If you disagree then please free to add a citation. You can find plenty in the 1984 anti-Sikh riots page. In either case, I don't see the need to remove the content. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 11:14, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you. That's great now. Apuldram (talk) 14:46, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
- Kaytilya, if you are interested then review article Hindu Marriage Act, one user is keep on adding essay like blog writing on that article. He reverted me after one month. Its long term edit war. Moreover, if you see his edit summaries, he himself accepts that he is writing some content from blogs. Thank you. --Human3015Send WikiLove 14:59, 28 July 2015 (UTC)