Lowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs) m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Kautilya3/Archives/Archive 15) (bot |
Erik-the-red (talk | contribs) →WP:ARE: new section |
||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. <!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> — <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:transparent;;">[[User:MarkH21|MarkH<sub><small>21</small></sub>]]<sup>[[User talk:MarkH21|<span style="background-color:navy; color:white;">talk</span>]]</sup></span> 15:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC) |
[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. <!--Template:Discussion notice--><!--Template:ANI-notice--> — <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;font-size:100%;color:black;background-color:transparent;;">[[User:MarkH21|MarkH<sub><small>21</small></sub>]]<sup>[[User talk:MarkH21|<span style="background-color:navy; color:white;">talk</span>]]</sup></span> 15:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC) |
||
== WP:ARE == |
|||
There is now a [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&diff=968677156&oldid=968672732 discussion] concerning you at [[WP:ARE]]. Please make your comments there. [[User:Erik-the-red|Erik-the-red]] ([[User talk:Erik-the-red|talk]]) 20:42, 20 July 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:42, 20 July 2020
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
Pangong Tso
Your recent editing history at Pangong Tso shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
as you have already CONTINUOUSLunduly reverted the content repeatedly as well as submitted sanction requests for contributing editors without yourself writing and contributing positively to wikipedia. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.210.144.148 (talk • contribs)
- Hey pal, please raise whatever issues you have at Talk:Pangong Tso. Continued harassment will get you blocked again. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 22:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
- I've semi-protected your page for a bit. Hope that's ok. --regentspark (comment) 23:26, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
Your recent editing history at Dhola Post shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Erik-the-red (talk) 20:01, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lauren Boebert on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:30, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
"Urdudaan" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Urdudaan. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 18#Urdudaan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Toddy1 (talk) 05:14, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
FYI
Category:Invasions of India. Not sure what it means but if you could take a look? --RegentsPark (comment) 19:03, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah, watch-listed it. It seems reasonable so far. It will be interesting to consider if the Nepalese invasion of Kumaon and Garhwal counts as an "invasion of India" :-) -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:15, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
- Also Category:Invasions by India. Not clear to me if the Maratha conquest of North West India or Bengal qualifies as an invasion by or of India (India vs. India?). Not clear as well which India is being talked about (e.g., the India of Annexation of Hyderabad and the "India" of the Mughal Safavid wars are different entities). Sigh. Partition does cause a lot of confusion!--RegentsPark (comment) 22:38, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Thank you Kautilya3 for protecting some of the important India related articles from vandalism.❯❯❯Praveg A=9.8 05:15, 19 July 2020 (UTC) |
- Thank you Pravega. Good to make your acquaintance! Please feel free to call on me if you need help anywhere. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 19:36, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited India-China Border Roads, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Nemo and Milam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
ANI Notice
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — MarkH21talk 15:27, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
WP:ARE
There is now a discussion concerning you at WP:ARE. Please make your comments there. Erik-the-red (talk) 20:42, 20 July 2020 (UTC)