m Signing comment by Barcaxx1980 - "→Map: " |
→Syrian civil war sanctions notice: new section |
||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
The same map Sopher99 is using admits that FSA has only two villages west of Homs "Al-zara" and "Al-Husn". So please stop deleting the villages and try to add villages instead. The map should grow and more information should be added not deleted. |
The same map Sopher99 is using admits that FSA has only two villages west of Homs "Al-zara" and "Al-Husn". So please stop deleting the villages and try to add villages instead. The map should grow and more information should be added not deleted. |
||
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/foreign-affairs-defense/syrias-second-front/map-syrias-shifting-battle-lines/ <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Barcaxx1980|Barcaxx1980]] ([[User talk:Barcaxx1980|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barcaxx1980|contribs]]) 00:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/foreign-affairs-defense/syrias-second-front/map-syrias-shifting-battle-lines/ <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Barcaxx1980|Barcaxx1980]] ([[User talk:Barcaxx1980|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Barcaxx1980|contribs]]) 00:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
== Syrian civil war sanctions notice == |
|||
{{Ivmbox |
|||
| As a result of a [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive253#Request to amend sanctions on Syrian civil war articles|community decision]], broad [[Wikipedia:General sanctions|editing restrictions]] apply to all pages broadly related to the [[Syrian Civil War]]. These sanctions are described at [[Talk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions]] and a brief summary is included below: |
|||
*Sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the [[Wikipedia:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]], satisfy any [[:Category:Wikipedia conduct policies|standard of behavior]], or follow any [[Wikipedia:List of policies|normal editorial process]]. |
|||
*If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic or article ban. |
|||
*A [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#Other revert rules|one revert per twenty-four hours restriction]] applies to articles broadly related to the Syrian Civil War, with the wording listed [[Talk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions#1RR|here]]. |
|||
*Please familiarise yourself with the full decision at [[Talk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions]] before making any further edits to pages related to the Syrian Civil War. |
|||
*Sanctions imposed may be appealed to the imposing administrator or at the [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard|appropriate administrators' noticeboard]]. |
|||
Sanctions may only be imposed after the user is notified sanctions are in effect. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.<p> |
|||
This notice is effective only if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged at [[Talk:Syrian civil war/General sanctions#Log of notifications]]. |
|||
| Ambox warning blue.svg |
|||
| icon size = 50px}}--[[User:Bbb23|Bbb23]] ([[User talk:Bbb23|talk]]) 21:51, 21 February 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:51, 21 February 2014
Reliable sources
SANA not a reliable source, and we do not use it for changes on map. Hanibal911 (talk) 20:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps not you personally but other users definitely do when they want to confirm opposition gains (not losses). Same way as SOHR is routinely used to confirm regime gains.
- You should know as well as I do that if SANA confirms battles against Islamic Front in Adra, that means Islamic Front at least has a presence in Adra, they have no incentive to lie about that. Hell even SyrianPerspective shows Adra as rebel held. Why would you revert it? Kami888 (talk) 20:51, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- Let us not repeat the actions other users and will only use reliable sources. But SANA and SOHR are not reliable sources if their data not confirms reliable source . Also more reliable source confirm what Adra now under army control.The Independent 21:28, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Hanibal911 (talk)
Map
Hey Kami I understand your reasoning but no source says ISIS took them, and the arab chroinicle maps didn't show ISIS took them. Please self-revert. Sopher99 (talk) 21:27, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- There's no source that says rebels took it from ISIS either. Lack of reliable sources means we don't add the dot at all, rather than making wild guesses as to who might be in control of it.
- For example, I supported your edit putting towns north of Deir Ez Zor as lime because you had a source which said ISIS withdrew from Deir Ez Zor province under rebel pressure. Some other users bitterly oppose that edit regardless. Nonetheless, if you can get a reliable source which says that these towns should be lime I'll take it. Kami888 (talk) 00:10, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
The PBS map was published 6 days ago, so later than your sources. If you call that outdated, how do you call Sopher previous unsourced edits based on a AUGUST 2013 BBC map?. I have repeated it several times, remove his unsourced edits and the problem is over, but he refuse all the time. By reverting my unsourced edits and maintaining his unsourced edits you are reacting differently to the same behaviour. Dont get this as a personal attack, but as fact report. Regards,--HCPUNXKID 11:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks Kami
The same map Sopher99 is using admits that FSA has only two villages west of Homs "Al-zara" and "Al-Husn". So please stop deleting the villages and try to add villages instead. The map should grow and more information should be added not deleted. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/foreign-affairs-defense/syrias-second-front/map-syrias-shifting-battle-lines/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Barcaxx1980 (talk • contribs) 00:38, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Syrian civil war sanctions notice
As a result of a community decision, broad editing restrictions apply to all pages broadly related to the Syrian Civil War. These sanctions are described at Talk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions and a brief summary is included below:
- Sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process.
- If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic or article ban.
- A one revert per twenty-four hours restriction applies to articles broadly related to the Syrian Civil War, with the wording listed here.
- Please familiarise yourself with the full decision at Talk:Syrian Civil War/General sanctions before making any further edits to pages related to the Syrian Civil War.
- Sanctions imposed may be appealed to the imposing administrator or at the appropriate administrators' noticeboard.
This notice is effective only if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged at Talk:Syrian civil war/General sanctions#Log of notifications.