→United Daughters of the Confederacy: Replying to Lieutcoluseng (reply-link) |
Cold Fusion 2019 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
That said, I would like to understand your point of view as I might be persuaded otherwise. Thank you. __[[User:Lieutcoluseng|Lieutcoluseng]] ([[User talk:Lieutcoluseng|talk]]) 11:47, 12 March 2019 (UTC) |
That said, I would like to understand your point of view as I might be persuaded otherwise. Thank you. __[[User:Lieutcoluseng|Lieutcoluseng]] ([[User talk:Lieutcoluseng|talk]]) 11:47, 12 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
:{{tpw}} But if you go to arbcom, you'd have to explain describing significant POV content changes as "Copyedit (minor)" in your edit summaries. [[User:Levivich|Leviv]] <span style="display:inline-block;transform:rotate(45deg);position:relative;bottom:-.57em;">[[User talk:Levivich|ich]]</span> 14:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC) |
:{{tpw}} But if you go to arbcom, you'd have to explain describing significant POV content changes as "Copyedit (minor)" in your edit summaries. [[User:Levivich|Leviv]] <span style="display:inline-block;transform:rotate(45deg);position:relative;bottom:-.57em;">[[User talk:Levivich|ich]]</span> 14:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC) |
||
==Cold fusion deletion== |
|||
Hi, |
|||
Last year you got Abd Lomax banned and all his cold fusion research deleted on Wikiversity. Lomax has now filed a lawsuit against you and eight other John Does for his ban [https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/27215121/Lomax_v_WikiMedia_Foundation,_Inc_et_al]. You had no reason to delete his cold fusion research project. Abd at the time was being funded by a cold fusion research institute who invested a lot of money into his Wikiversity project and you had it deleted because of your pseudo-skeptic viewpoint. Could you put the project back? I am not Lomax but I support his cold fusion research. He has been targeted by pseudo-skeptics. [[User:Cold Fusion 2019|Cold Fusion 2019]] ([[User talk:Cold Fusion 2019|talk]]) 18:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:48, 14 March 2019
DRN
Hi there. Apologies if I've misunderstood the process, but could you help me understand how this edit happened the day after dnbnumber dot com was added to the blacklist? Thanks! —johndburger 20:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
- No idea, that should not be possible. please report it at fhe blacklist page in the troubleshooting section. i am on a mobile device in a hotel in Bengaluru so can't easily do it myself. Guy (Help!) 07:57, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
This is not a trout
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9b/Cyprinus_carpio.jpeg/200px-Cyprinus_carpio.jpeg)
I'm sorry to hear that your wifi is carp. Is there something fishy going on? –dlthewave ☎ 17:20, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Ha! I cannot type for tooffe. Guy (Help!) 18:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
- Carpe diem! Leviv ich 00:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Anybody familiar?
FYI. Leviv ich 00:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- Hmmm, not a familiar choice of subjects. I have added PC protection to Greta Thunberg based on BLP issues with those edits. Guy (Help!) 04:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
United Daughters of the Confederacy
Dear JgZ,
Do you "own" the United Daughters of the Confederacy Wikipedia page?
The reason I ask is because its my understanding that Wikipedia is a platform anyone can edit; yet, it appears that, based on your recent reversions, if the edits do not agree with the exact subject heading or sentance paraphrasing that you ideologically subscribe to, edits are reverted (with intimidation, I might add). I cannot help but question your motives as they very well could be biased, since by your own admission (from your own Wikipedia profile) you state the following: "This user is one of the 532 left-wing thought police who aggressively force their biased perspective on the rest of the world."
Having read the Wikipedia "non-bias" neutrality rules, I can't help but think arbitration dispute might be in order.
That said, I would like to understand your point of view as I might be persuaded otherwise. Thank you. __Lieutcoluseng (talk) 11:47, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) But if you go to arbcom, you'd have to explain describing significant POV content changes as "Copyedit (minor)" in your edit summaries. Leviv ich 14:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
Cold fusion deletion
Hi,
Last year you got Abd Lomax banned and all his cold fusion research deleted on Wikiversity. Lomax has now filed a lawsuit against you and eight other John Does for his ban [1]. You had no reason to delete his cold fusion research project. Abd at the time was being funded by a cold fusion research institute who invested a lot of money into his Wikiversity project and you had it deleted because of your pseudo-skeptic viewpoint. Could you put the project back? I am not Lomax but I support his cold fusion research. He has been targeted by pseudo-skeptics. Cold Fusion 2019 (talk) 18:48, 14 March 2019 (UTC)