Orangemarlin (talk | contribs) →For your consideration...: My thoughts. |
Random user 39849958 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
:: Clearly I do care. I did come here and talk to you, did I not? I would appreciate some constructive criticism from you - an Admin - rather than personal attacks I've come to expect from editors like the ones commenting above. Again, I found your comments on the AN/I particularly offensive and I am asking you to either redact or explain your rationale to me, giving me specific examples of ways I may have offended you. Thanks! -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">[[User:Levine2112|Levine2112]]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">[[User talk:Levine2112|discuss]]</font></sup> 01:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC) |
:: Clearly I do care. I did come here and talk to you, did I not? I would appreciate some constructive criticism from you - an Admin - rather than personal attacks I've come to expect from editors like the ones commenting above. Again, I found your comments on the AN/I particularly offensive and I am asking you to either redact or explain your rationale to me, giving me specific examples of ways I may have offended you. Thanks! -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">[[User:Levine2112|Levine2112]]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">[[User talk:Levine2112|discuss]]</font></sup> 01:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::At least I'm honest with myself. I don't say "Gee, should I assume good faith or not." When I don't have AGF, I just state it clearly. [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 02:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC) |
:::At least I'm honest with myself. I don't say "Gee, should I assume good faith or not." When I don't have AGF, I just state it clearly. [[User:Orangemarlin|<font color="orange">'''Orange'''</font><font color="teal">'''Marlin'''</font>]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Orangemarlin|Talk•]] [[Special:Contributions/Orangemarlin|Contributions]]</sup></small> 02:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
:::: And I am honest with myself. And I always try my best to assume good faith in others. Everyone please consider this from [[WP:AGF]]'s nutshell: ''If criticism is needed, discuss editors' actions, but '''it is not ever necessary nor productive to accuse others of harmful motives'''.'' -- <b><font color="996600" face="times new roman,times,serif">[[User:Levine2112|Levine2112]]</font></b> <sup><font color="#774400" size="1" style="padding:1px;border:1px #996600 dotted;background-color:#FFFF99">[[User talk:Levine2112|discuss]]</font></sup> 03:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC) |
|||
== Essittam == |
== Essittam == |
Revision as of 03:04, 18 December 2007
I am here for some very limited purposes, because some people have asked me to help in some specific cases. I am prepared to do this. I am not intending to be here much, at present. I have not yet decided whether to start using this account actively again. No, I don't want to talk about any of the foregoing, thanks, the people concerned know who they are and how to get hold of me. This is about some ongoing unresolved issues being discussed on one or more mailing lists, when that debate comes to fruition I will take a view. Guy (Help!) 12:45, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
- Please see User:JzG/Harassment links.
Were this admin to act in a foolish, trollish, or dickish way, he is open to being slapped with a large trout. |
- Bored? Looking for something to do? Try User:Eagle 101/problem BLPs.
- See my winter cycling tips - feel free to suggest more!
- My take on the Durova incident.
Images in policy pages
I noticed you restored an image I had removed from Wikipedia:No legal threats. Maybe it's just me, but I find gratuitous (esp. humorous) images in policy pages awkward and inappropriate. Here's another example. At any rate, I won't remove those images if others think they serve a good purpose, I just don't see that positive purpose or how they add anything useful to those pages. But that's not the reason why I removed that image. If the images were merely decorative and didn't harm the appearance of the page, I wouldn't mind either way. But actually, I think that since people are most commonly being pointed to those pages in case of violations/warnings, those images are really inappropriate and detrimental to the appearance and purpose of the pages in that they create a somewhat "childish" atmosphere. Policies are not fun and games, certainly not for those looking them up for a specific purpose. I dorftrottel I talk I 10:23, December 13, 2007
- It's a long-standing in-joke based on a user who threatened to sue all and sundry "in a court of law in Trenton, New Jersey". Guy (Help!) 17:05, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi there. I see you deleted this article on November 15, any chance I can get a copy of what was there in my userspace? I'm looking at Self-locking device now and wondering whether it was relevant/useful. --You can reply here -- maelgwn - talk 06:30, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
- Someone made a redirect, I restored this history under it, you'll see there's nothing relevant there. Guy (Help!) 08:44, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
Twinkle didn't finish this AfD for you, so I did. Hope you don't mind. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 22:13, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
Please see the investigation that's been done here and provide any additional information you can. Thanks. - Jehochman Talk 03:21, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi. :) An editor on this article has requested that the protection be lifted from Race and intelligence. Since you last changed the protection level, I'm checking to see if you're in touch with the disputants or have any objection to its being lifted before it expires in February. Cheers. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:46, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- No objection, if the parties think they can proceed without warring. Guy (Help!) 18:59, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- I'll keep an eye on 'em. :) --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:20, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
For your consideration...
I found the comments you made here to be highly inflammatory, lacking in any sort of civility or assumption of good faith, and completely untrue. I am sorry that you have this impression of me, but if you read my response to your comment, I hope you understand that this impression is completely false. -- Levine2112 discuss 21:21, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- You have worn out any presumption of good faith. You attack every article with a passion that only the Creationists around here match. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 21:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, OrangeMarlin. I understand that I can't expect any good faith from you, but please know that despite your lack of good faith in me, I will still assume good faith in you. How about you, Guy? -- Levine2112 discuss 21:40, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- As with OrangeMarlin, I still will assume good faith with your Shot info, despite your inability to do so with me. -- Levine2112 discuss 22:57, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Currently, I am working hard to achieve a consensus at Quackwatch. I have suggested several compromises and agreed to other's suggestions. So, I hope you understand that I am unclear what you mean when you say I have an "inability to accept a consensus nor achieve a compromise position suggests otherwise". -- Levine2112 discuss 01:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- Levine, my opinion of you is low and dropping, and you're not doing anything to fix that, nor do you appear to care. Guy (Help!) 23:16, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Clearly I do care. I did come here and talk to you, did I not? I would appreciate some constructive criticism from you - an Admin - rather than personal attacks I've come to expect from editors like the ones commenting above. Again, I found your comments on the AN/I particularly offensive and I am asking you to either redact or explain your rationale to me, giving me specific examples of ways I may have offended you. Thanks! -- Levine2112 discuss 01:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- At least I'm honest with myself. I don't say "Gee, should I assume good faith or not." When I don't have AGF, I just state it clearly. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 02:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- And I am honest with myself. And I always try my best to assume good faith in others. Everyone please consider this from WP:AGF's nutshell: If criticism is needed, discuss editors' actions, but it is not ever necessary nor productive to accuse others of harmful motives. -- Levine2112 discuss 03:04, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- At least I'm honest with myself. I don't say "Gee, should I assume good faith or not." When I don't have AGF, I just state it clearly. OrangeMarlin Talk• Contributions 02:12, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
- Clearly I do care. I did come here and talk to you, did I not? I would appreciate some constructive criticism from you - an Admin - rather than personal attacks I've come to expect from editors like the ones commenting above. Again, I found your comments on the AN/I particularly offensive and I am asking you to either redact or explain your rationale to me, giving me specific examples of ways I may have offended you. Thanks! -- Levine2112 discuss 01:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Essittam
It's Ekajati's on her hosting machine. DYK that the same hosting machine dug up by CU was blocked by Dmc ten months ago...I presume your comment about Mattisse is a joke.Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:33, 18 December 2007 (UTC)