General note: Adding original research, including unpublished syntheses of sources on The Kyiv Independent. Tag: Twinkle |
→March 2022: Important notice Tag: contentious topics alert |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] [[Help:Getting started|Welcome to Wikipedia]]. We appreciate [[Special:Contributions/JustTheT|your contributions]], but in one of your recent edits to [[:The Kyiv Independent]], it appears that you have added [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]], which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses [[Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position|combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say]]. Please be prepared to cite a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the [[Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1|tutorial on citing sources]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-nor1 --> [[User:RenatUK|<span style="background-color:#FF7400; color:#FFFFFF;">Renat</span>]] 03:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC) |
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] [[Help:Getting started|Welcome to Wikipedia]]. We appreciate [[Special:Contributions/JustTheT|your contributions]], but in one of your recent edits to [[:The Kyiv Independent]], it appears that you have added [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]], which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses [[Wikipedia:No original research#Synthesis of published material that advances a position|combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say]]. Please be prepared to cite a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the [[Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1|tutorial on citing sources]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-nor1 --> [[User:RenatUK|<span style="background-color:#FF7400; color:#FFFFFF;">Renat</span>]] 03:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC) |
||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
|||
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. |
|||
For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
|||
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert -->--[[User:RenatUK|<span style="background-color:#FF7400; color:#FFFFFF;">Renat</span>]] 03:42, 22 March 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:42, 22 March 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. KidAd • SPEAK 03:40, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
New here
I got your message about what appears as an improper edit could you please point me to which edit this is in reference to? I will gladly apply the citations needed to provide evidence of any edit and assumed I had so it was simply an oversight. Thanks and sorry for trouble. JustTheT (talk) 06:56, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
October 2021
Hello, I'm Neveselbert. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Edward Heath, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 14:56, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Robert Kagan, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Uranium Site (talk) 17:11, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
The source was plainly cited but to make matters even clearer I repeated the additional context and added an additional source. Really am confused why you claimed the source used for the rest of the statement was somehow not “reliable” for the additional content as they were found in the same article. JustTheT (talk) 08:45, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Important Notice
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the September 11 attacks. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 18:49, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
We’re the edits I made not in line with Wikipedia policy?
It’s entirely possible they were not but they were accurate and I provided sourcing and will certainly make the requested changes to make them compliant. JustTheT (talk) 06:57, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
March 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to The Kyiv Independent, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Renat 03:36, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
--Renat 03:42, 22 March 2022 (UTC)