Content deleted Content added
Juan.h.gonzalez.1 (talk | contribs) →July 2022: Reply Tag: Reply |
→July 2022: Reply Tag: Reply |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I added reliable sources, but you erased them because you thought they were spam. There are many companies selling CBG strains, but I cannot cite them because their sources are commercial. I understand the conflit in this, so then I added a research article, and you erased it too. Is it really a matter of the lack or sources? What kind of sources do you like? [[User:Juan.h.gonzalez.1|Juan.h.gonzalez.1]] ([[User talk:Juan.h.gonzalez.1#top|talk]]) 13:47, 6 July 2022 (UTC) |
:I added reliable sources, but you erased them because you thought they were spam. There are many companies selling CBG strains, but I cannot cite them because their sources are commercial. I understand the conflit in this, so then I added a research article, and you erased it too. Is it really a matter of the lack or sources? What kind of sources do you like? [[User:Juan.h.gonzalez.1|Juan.h.gonzalez.1]] ([[User talk:Juan.h.gonzalez.1#top|talk]]) 13:47, 6 July 2022 (UTC) |
||
::[https://hrcak.srce.hr/242229 This] is lab research with substantial conjecture published in a low-quality journal. We need [[WP:SCIRS]] review articles in reputable journals for the encyclopedia. Also government science positions, like the US FDA provides for CBD [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabidiol#United_States here] are good examples of how CBG will be studied and authorized. [[User:Zefr|Zefr]] ([[User talk:Zefr|talk]]) 13:55, 6 July 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:55, 6 July 2022
July 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cannabigerol, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. WP:SCIRS sources are needed - yours were inadequate. Also, maintain WP:NPOV in your writing - saying something is "promising" is promotional. Zefr (talk) 13:33, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- I added reliable sources, but you erased them because you thought they were spam. There are many companies selling CBG strains, but I cannot cite them because their sources are commercial. I understand the conflit in this, so then I added a research article, and you erased it too. Is it really a matter of the lack or sources? What kind of sources do you like? Juan.h.gonzalez.1 (talk) 13:47, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
- This is lab research with substantial conjecture published in a low-quality journal. We need WP:SCIRS review articles in reputable journals for the encyclopedia. Also government science positions, like the US FDA provides for CBD here are good examples of how CBG will be studied and authorized. Zefr (talk) 13:55, 6 July 2022 (UTC)